Cargando…

Lung-protective ventilation worsens ventilator-induced diaphragm atrophy and weakness

BACKGROUND: Lung–protective ventilation (LPV) has been found to minimize the risk of ventilator–induced lung injury (VILI). However, whether LPV is able to diminish ventilator–induced diaphragm dysfunction (VIDD) remains unknown. This study was designed to test the hypothesis that LPV protects the d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhou, Xian-Long, Wei, Xiao-Jun, Li, Shao-Ping, Ma, Hao-Li, Zhao, Yan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6954632/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31924204
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12931-020-1276-7
_version_ 1783486836429029376
author Zhou, Xian-Long
Wei, Xiao-Jun
Li, Shao-Ping
Ma, Hao-Li
Zhao, Yan
author_facet Zhou, Xian-Long
Wei, Xiao-Jun
Li, Shao-Ping
Ma, Hao-Li
Zhao, Yan
author_sort Zhou, Xian-Long
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Lung–protective ventilation (LPV) has been found to minimize the risk of ventilator–induced lung injury (VILI). However, whether LPV is able to diminish ventilator–induced diaphragm dysfunction (VIDD) remains unknown. This study was designed to test the hypothesis that LPV protects the diaphragm against VIDD. METHODS: Adult male Wistar rats received either conventional mechanical (tidal volume [V(T)]: 10 ml/kg, positive end–expiratory pressure [PEEP]: 2 cm H(2)O; CV group) or lung-protective (V(T): 5 ml/kg, PEEP: 10 cm H(2)O; LPV group) ventilation for 12 h. Then, diaphragms and lungs were collected for biochemical and histological analyses. Transcriptome sequencing (RNA–seq) was performed to determine the differentially expressed genes in the diaphragms between groups. RESULTS: Our results suggested that LPV was associated with diminished pulmonary injuries and reduced oxidative stress compared with the effects of the CV strategy in rats. However, animals that received LPV showed increased protein degradation, decreased cross–sectional areas (CSAs) of myofibers, and reduced forces of the diaphragm compared with the same parameters in animals receiving CV (p < 0.05). In addition, the LPV group showed a higher level of oxidative stress in the diaphragm than the CV group (p < 0.05). Moreover, RNA–seq and western blots revealed that the peroxisome proliferator–activated receptor γ coactivator–1alpha (PGC–1α), a powerful reactive oxygen species (ROS) inhibitor, was significantly downregulated in the LPV group compared with its expression in the CV group (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the CV strategy, the LPV strategy did not protect the diaphragm against VIDD in rats. In contrast, the LPV strategy worsened VIDD by inducing oxidative stress together with the downregulation of PGC–1α in the diaphragm. However, further studies are required to determine the roles of PGC–1α in ventilator-induced diaphragmatic oxidative stress.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6954632
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69546322020-01-14 Lung-protective ventilation worsens ventilator-induced diaphragm atrophy and weakness Zhou, Xian-Long Wei, Xiao-Jun Li, Shao-Ping Ma, Hao-Li Zhao, Yan Respir Res Research BACKGROUND: Lung–protective ventilation (LPV) has been found to minimize the risk of ventilator–induced lung injury (VILI). However, whether LPV is able to diminish ventilator–induced diaphragm dysfunction (VIDD) remains unknown. This study was designed to test the hypothesis that LPV protects the diaphragm against VIDD. METHODS: Adult male Wistar rats received either conventional mechanical (tidal volume [V(T)]: 10 ml/kg, positive end–expiratory pressure [PEEP]: 2 cm H(2)O; CV group) or lung-protective (V(T): 5 ml/kg, PEEP: 10 cm H(2)O; LPV group) ventilation for 12 h. Then, diaphragms and lungs were collected for biochemical and histological analyses. Transcriptome sequencing (RNA–seq) was performed to determine the differentially expressed genes in the diaphragms between groups. RESULTS: Our results suggested that LPV was associated with diminished pulmonary injuries and reduced oxidative stress compared with the effects of the CV strategy in rats. However, animals that received LPV showed increased protein degradation, decreased cross–sectional areas (CSAs) of myofibers, and reduced forces of the diaphragm compared with the same parameters in animals receiving CV (p < 0.05). In addition, the LPV group showed a higher level of oxidative stress in the diaphragm than the CV group (p < 0.05). Moreover, RNA–seq and western blots revealed that the peroxisome proliferator–activated receptor γ coactivator–1alpha (PGC–1α), a powerful reactive oxygen species (ROS) inhibitor, was significantly downregulated in the LPV group compared with its expression in the CV group (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the CV strategy, the LPV strategy did not protect the diaphragm against VIDD in rats. In contrast, the LPV strategy worsened VIDD by inducing oxidative stress together with the downregulation of PGC–1α in the diaphragm. However, further studies are required to determine the roles of PGC–1α in ventilator-induced diaphragmatic oxidative stress. BioMed Central 2020-01-10 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC6954632/ /pubmed/31924204 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12931-020-1276-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Zhou, Xian-Long
Wei, Xiao-Jun
Li, Shao-Ping
Ma, Hao-Li
Zhao, Yan
Lung-protective ventilation worsens ventilator-induced diaphragm atrophy and weakness
title Lung-protective ventilation worsens ventilator-induced diaphragm atrophy and weakness
title_full Lung-protective ventilation worsens ventilator-induced diaphragm atrophy and weakness
title_fullStr Lung-protective ventilation worsens ventilator-induced diaphragm atrophy and weakness
title_full_unstemmed Lung-protective ventilation worsens ventilator-induced diaphragm atrophy and weakness
title_short Lung-protective ventilation worsens ventilator-induced diaphragm atrophy and weakness
title_sort lung-protective ventilation worsens ventilator-induced diaphragm atrophy and weakness
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6954632/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31924204
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12931-020-1276-7
work_keys_str_mv AT zhouxianlong lungprotectiveventilationworsensventilatorinduceddiaphragmatrophyandweakness
AT weixiaojun lungprotectiveventilationworsensventilatorinduceddiaphragmatrophyandweakness
AT lishaoping lungprotectiveventilationworsensventilatorinduceddiaphragmatrophyandweakness
AT mahaoli lungprotectiveventilationworsensventilatorinduceddiaphragmatrophyandweakness
AT zhaoyan lungprotectiveventilationworsensventilatorinduceddiaphragmatrophyandweakness