Cargando…

Trends in mesenchymal stem cell clinical trials 2004‐2018: Is efficacy optimal in a narrow dose range?

The number of clinical trials using mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) has increased since 2008, but this trend slowed in the past several years and dropped precipitously in 2018. Previous reports have analyzed MSC clinical trials by disease, phase, cell source, country of origin, and trial initiation da...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kabat, Maciej, Bobkov, Ivan, Kumar, Suneel, Grumet, Martin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6954709/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31804767
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sctm.19-0202
_version_ 1783486845037838336
author Kabat, Maciej
Bobkov, Ivan
Kumar, Suneel
Grumet, Martin
author_facet Kabat, Maciej
Bobkov, Ivan
Kumar, Suneel
Grumet, Martin
author_sort Kabat, Maciej
collection PubMed
description The number of clinical trials using mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) has increased since 2008, but this trend slowed in the past several years and dropped precipitously in 2018. Previous reports have analyzed MSC clinical trials by disease, phase, cell source, country of origin, and trial initiation date, all of which can be downloaded directly from http://clinicaltrials.gov. We have extended analyses to a larger group of 914 MSC trials reported through 2018. To search for potential factors that may influence the design of new trials, we extracted data on routes of administration and dosing from individual http://clinicaltrials.gov records as this information cannot be downloaded directly from the database. Intravenous (IV) injection is the most common, least invasive and most reproducible method, accounting for 43% of all trials. The median dose for IV delivery is 100 million MSCs/patient/dose. Analysis of all trials using IV injection that reported positive outcomes indicated minimal effective doses (MEDs) ranging from 70 to 190 million MSCs/patient/dose in 14/16 trials with the other two trials administering much higher doses of at least 900 million cells. Dose‐response data showing differential efficacy for improved outcomes were reported in only four trials, which indicated a narrower MED range of 100‐150 million MSCs/patient with lower and higher IV doses being less effective. The results suggest that it may be critical to determine MEDs in early trials before proceeding with large clinical trials.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6954709
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69547092020-01-17 Trends in mesenchymal stem cell clinical trials 2004‐2018: Is efficacy optimal in a narrow dose range? Kabat, Maciej Bobkov, Ivan Kumar, Suneel Grumet, Martin Stem Cells Transl Med Human Clinical Articles The number of clinical trials using mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) has increased since 2008, but this trend slowed in the past several years and dropped precipitously in 2018. Previous reports have analyzed MSC clinical trials by disease, phase, cell source, country of origin, and trial initiation date, all of which can be downloaded directly from http://clinicaltrials.gov. We have extended analyses to a larger group of 914 MSC trials reported through 2018. To search for potential factors that may influence the design of new trials, we extracted data on routes of administration and dosing from individual http://clinicaltrials.gov records as this information cannot be downloaded directly from the database. Intravenous (IV) injection is the most common, least invasive and most reproducible method, accounting for 43% of all trials. The median dose for IV delivery is 100 million MSCs/patient/dose. Analysis of all trials using IV injection that reported positive outcomes indicated minimal effective doses (MEDs) ranging from 70 to 190 million MSCs/patient/dose in 14/16 trials with the other two trials administering much higher doses of at least 900 million cells. Dose‐response data showing differential efficacy for improved outcomes were reported in only four trials, which indicated a narrower MED range of 100‐150 million MSCs/patient with lower and higher IV doses being less effective. The results suggest that it may be critical to determine MEDs in early trials before proceeding with large clinical trials. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2019-12-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6954709/ /pubmed/31804767 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sctm.19-0202 Text en © 2020 The Authors. stem cells translational medicine published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of AlphaMed Press This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Human Clinical Articles
Kabat, Maciej
Bobkov, Ivan
Kumar, Suneel
Grumet, Martin
Trends in mesenchymal stem cell clinical trials 2004‐2018: Is efficacy optimal in a narrow dose range?
title Trends in mesenchymal stem cell clinical trials 2004‐2018: Is efficacy optimal in a narrow dose range?
title_full Trends in mesenchymal stem cell clinical trials 2004‐2018: Is efficacy optimal in a narrow dose range?
title_fullStr Trends in mesenchymal stem cell clinical trials 2004‐2018: Is efficacy optimal in a narrow dose range?
title_full_unstemmed Trends in mesenchymal stem cell clinical trials 2004‐2018: Is efficacy optimal in a narrow dose range?
title_short Trends in mesenchymal stem cell clinical trials 2004‐2018: Is efficacy optimal in a narrow dose range?
title_sort trends in mesenchymal stem cell clinical trials 2004‐2018: is efficacy optimal in a narrow dose range?
topic Human Clinical Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6954709/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31804767
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sctm.19-0202
work_keys_str_mv AT kabatmaciej trendsinmesenchymalstemcellclinicaltrials20042018isefficacyoptimalinanarrowdoserange
AT bobkovivan trendsinmesenchymalstemcellclinicaltrials20042018isefficacyoptimalinanarrowdoserange
AT kumarsuneel trendsinmesenchymalstemcellclinicaltrials20042018isefficacyoptimalinanarrowdoserange
AT grumetmartin trendsinmesenchymalstemcellclinicaltrials20042018isefficacyoptimalinanarrowdoserange