Cargando…

Developing a framework to incorporate real-world evidence in cancer drug funding decisions: the Canadian Real-world Evidence for Value of Cancer Drugs (CanREValue) collaboration

BACKGROUND: Oncology therapy is becoming increasingly more expensive and challenging the affordability and sustainability of drug programmes around the world. When new drugs are evaluated, health technology assessment organisations rely on clinical trials to inform funding decisions. However, clinic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chan, Kelvin, Nam, Seungree, Evans, Bill, de Oliveira, Claire, Chambers, Alexandra, Gavura, Scott, Hoch, Jeffrey, Mercer, Rebecca E, Dai, Wei Fang, Beca, Jaclyn, Tadrous, Mina, Isaranuwatchai, Wanrudee
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6955501/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31915169
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032884
_version_ 1783486943111151616
author Chan, Kelvin
Nam, Seungree
Evans, Bill
de Oliveira, Claire
Chambers, Alexandra
Gavura, Scott
Hoch, Jeffrey
Mercer, Rebecca E
Dai, Wei Fang
Beca, Jaclyn
Tadrous, Mina
Isaranuwatchai, Wanrudee
author_facet Chan, Kelvin
Nam, Seungree
Evans, Bill
de Oliveira, Claire
Chambers, Alexandra
Gavura, Scott
Hoch, Jeffrey
Mercer, Rebecca E
Dai, Wei Fang
Beca, Jaclyn
Tadrous, Mina
Isaranuwatchai, Wanrudee
author_sort Chan, Kelvin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Oncology therapy is becoming increasingly more expensive and challenging the affordability and sustainability of drug programmes around the world. When new drugs are evaluated, health technology assessment organisations rely on clinical trials to inform funding decisions. However, clinical trials are not able to assess overall survival and generalises evidence in a real-world setting. As a result, policy makers have little information on whether drug funding decisions based on clinical trials ultimately yield the outcomes and value for money that might be expected. OBJECTIVE: The Canadian Real-world Evidence for Value of Cancer Drugs (CanREValue) collaboration, consisting of researchers, recommendation-makers, decision makers, payers, patients and caregivers, are developing and testing a framework for Canadian provinces to generate and use real-world evidence (RWE) for cancer drug funding in a consistent and integrated manner. STRATEGY: The CanREValue collaboration has established five formal working groups (WGs) to focus on specific processes in the generation and use of RWE for cancer drug funding decisions in Canada. The different RWE WGs are: (1) Planning and Drug Selection; (2) Methods; (3) Data; (4) Reassessment and Uptake; (5) Engagement. These WGs are acting collaboratively to develop a framework for RWE evaluation, validate the framework through the multiprovince RWE projects and help to integrate the final RWE framework into the Canadian healthcare system. OUTCOMES: The framework will enable the reassessment of cancer drugs, refinement of funding recommendations and use of novel funding mechanisms by decision-makers/payers across Canada to ensure the healthcare system is providing clinical benefits and value for money.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6955501
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69555012020-01-27 Developing a framework to incorporate real-world evidence in cancer drug funding decisions: the Canadian Real-world Evidence for Value of Cancer Drugs (CanREValue) collaboration Chan, Kelvin Nam, Seungree Evans, Bill de Oliveira, Claire Chambers, Alexandra Gavura, Scott Hoch, Jeffrey Mercer, Rebecca E Dai, Wei Fang Beca, Jaclyn Tadrous, Mina Isaranuwatchai, Wanrudee BMJ Open Health Economics BACKGROUND: Oncology therapy is becoming increasingly more expensive and challenging the affordability and sustainability of drug programmes around the world. When new drugs are evaluated, health technology assessment organisations rely on clinical trials to inform funding decisions. However, clinical trials are not able to assess overall survival and generalises evidence in a real-world setting. As a result, policy makers have little information on whether drug funding decisions based on clinical trials ultimately yield the outcomes and value for money that might be expected. OBJECTIVE: The Canadian Real-world Evidence for Value of Cancer Drugs (CanREValue) collaboration, consisting of researchers, recommendation-makers, decision makers, payers, patients and caregivers, are developing and testing a framework for Canadian provinces to generate and use real-world evidence (RWE) for cancer drug funding in a consistent and integrated manner. STRATEGY: The CanREValue collaboration has established five formal working groups (WGs) to focus on specific processes in the generation and use of RWE for cancer drug funding decisions in Canada. The different RWE WGs are: (1) Planning and Drug Selection; (2) Methods; (3) Data; (4) Reassessment and Uptake; (5) Engagement. These WGs are acting collaboratively to develop a framework for RWE evaluation, validate the framework through the multiprovince RWE projects and help to integrate the final RWE framework into the Canadian healthcare system. OUTCOMES: The framework will enable the reassessment of cancer drugs, refinement of funding recommendations and use of novel funding mechanisms by decision-makers/payers across Canada to ensure the healthcare system is providing clinical benefits and value for money. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-01-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6955501/ /pubmed/31915169 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032884 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Health Economics
Chan, Kelvin
Nam, Seungree
Evans, Bill
de Oliveira, Claire
Chambers, Alexandra
Gavura, Scott
Hoch, Jeffrey
Mercer, Rebecca E
Dai, Wei Fang
Beca, Jaclyn
Tadrous, Mina
Isaranuwatchai, Wanrudee
Developing a framework to incorporate real-world evidence in cancer drug funding decisions: the Canadian Real-world Evidence for Value of Cancer Drugs (CanREValue) collaboration
title Developing a framework to incorporate real-world evidence in cancer drug funding decisions: the Canadian Real-world Evidence for Value of Cancer Drugs (CanREValue) collaboration
title_full Developing a framework to incorporate real-world evidence in cancer drug funding decisions: the Canadian Real-world Evidence for Value of Cancer Drugs (CanREValue) collaboration
title_fullStr Developing a framework to incorporate real-world evidence in cancer drug funding decisions: the Canadian Real-world Evidence for Value of Cancer Drugs (CanREValue) collaboration
title_full_unstemmed Developing a framework to incorporate real-world evidence in cancer drug funding decisions: the Canadian Real-world Evidence for Value of Cancer Drugs (CanREValue) collaboration
title_short Developing a framework to incorporate real-world evidence in cancer drug funding decisions: the Canadian Real-world Evidence for Value of Cancer Drugs (CanREValue) collaboration
title_sort developing a framework to incorporate real-world evidence in cancer drug funding decisions: the canadian real-world evidence for value of cancer drugs (canrevalue) collaboration
topic Health Economics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6955501/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31915169
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032884
work_keys_str_mv AT chankelvin developingaframeworktoincorporaterealworldevidenceincancerdrugfundingdecisionsthecanadianrealworldevidenceforvalueofcancerdrugscanrevaluecollaboration
AT namseungree developingaframeworktoincorporaterealworldevidenceincancerdrugfundingdecisionsthecanadianrealworldevidenceforvalueofcancerdrugscanrevaluecollaboration
AT evansbill developingaframeworktoincorporaterealworldevidenceincancerdrugfundingdecisionsthecanadianrealworldevidenceforvalueofcancerdrugscanrevaluecollaboration
AT deoliveiraclaire developingaframeworktoincorporaterealworldevidenceincancerdrugfundingdecisionsthecanadianrealworldevidenceforvalueofcancerdrugscanrevaluecollaboration
AT chambersalexandra developingaframeworktoincorporaterealworldevidenceincancerdrugfundingdecisionsthecanadianrealworldevidenceforvalueofcancerdrugscanrevaluecollaboration
AT gavurascott developingaframeworktoincorporaterealworldevidenceincancerdrugfundingdecisionsthecanadianrealworldevidenceforvalueofcancerdrugscanrevaluecollaboration
AT hochjeffrey developingaframeworktoincorporaterealworldevidenceincancerdrugfundingdecisionsthecanadianrealworldevidenceforvalueofcancerdrugscanrevaluecollaboration
AT mercerrebeccae developingaframeworktoincorporaterealworldevidenceincancerdrugfundingdecisionsthecanadianrealworldevidenceforvalueofcancerdrugscanrevaluecollaboration
AT daiweifang developingaframeworktoincorporaterealworldevidenceincancerdrugfundingdecisionsthecanadianrealworldevidenceforvalueofcancerdrugscanrevaluecollaboration
AT becajaclyn developingaframeworktoincorporaterealworldevidenceincancerdrugfundingdecisionsthecanadianrealworldevidenceforvalueofcancerdrugscanrevaluecollaboration
AT tadrousmina developingaframeworktoincorporaterealworldevidenceincancerdrugfundingdecisionsthecanadianrealworldevidenceforvalueofcancerdrugscanrevaluecollaboration
AT isaranuwatchaiwanrudee developingaframeworktoincorporaterealworldevidenceincancerdrugfundingdecisionsthecanadianrealworldevidenceforvalueofcancerdrugscanrevaluecollaboration