Cargando…
Developing a framework to incorporate real-world evidence in cancer drug funding decisions: the Canadian Real-world Evidence for Value of Cancer Drugs (CanREValue) collaboration
BACKGROUND: Oncology therapy is becoming increasingly more expensive and challenging the affordability and sustainability of drug programmes around the world. When new drugs are evaluated, health technology assessment organisations rely on clinical trials to inform funding decisions. However, clinic...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6955501/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31915169 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032884 |
_version_ | 1783486943111151616 |
---|---|
author | Chan, Kelvin Nam, Seungree Evans, Bill de Oliveira, Claire Chambers, Alexandra Gavura, Scott Hoch, Jeffrey Mercer, Rebecca E Dai, Wei Fang Beca, Jaclyn Tadrous, Mina Isaranuwatchai, Wanrudee |
author_facet | Chan, Kelvin Nam, Seungree Evans, Bill de Oliveira, Claire Chambers, Alexandra Gavura, Scott Hoch, Jeffrey Mercer, Rebecca E Dai, Wei Fang Beca, Jaclyn Tadrous, Mina Isaranuwatchai, Wanrudee |
author_sort | Chan, Kelvin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Oncology therapy is becoming increasingly more expensive and challenging the affordability and sustainability of drug programmes around the world. When new drugs are evaluated, health technology assessment organisations rely on clinical trials to inform funding decisions. However, clinical trials are not able to assess overall survival and generalises evidence in a real-world setting. As a result, policy makers have little information on whether drug funding decisions based on clinical trials ultimately yield the outcomes and value for money that might be expected. OBJECTIVE: The Canadian Real-world Evidence for Value of Cancer Drugs (CanREValue) collaboration, consisting of researchers, recommendation-makers, decision makers, payers, patients and caregivers, are developing and testing a framework for Canadian provinces to generate and use real-world evidence (RWE) for cancer drug funding in a consistent and integrated manner. STRATEGY: The CanREValue collaboration has established five formal working groups (WGs) to focus on specific processes in the generation and use of RWE for cancer drug funding decisions in Canada. The different RWE WGs are: (1) Planning and Drug Selection; (2) Methods; (3) Data; (4) Reassessment and Uptake; (5) Engagement. These WGs are acting collaboratively to develop a framework for RWE evaluation, validate the framework through the multiprovince RWE projects and help to integrate the final RWE framework into the Canadian healthcare system. OUTCOMES: The framework will enable the reassessment of cancer drugs, refinement of funding recommendations and use of novel funding mechanisms by decision-makers/payers across Canada to ensure the healthcare system is providing clinical benefits and value for money. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6955501 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69555012020-01-27 Developing a framework to incorporate real-world evidence in cancer drug funding decisions: the Canadian Real-world Evidence for Value of Cancer Drugs (CanREValue) collaboration Chan, Kelvin Nam, Seungree Evans, Bill de Oliveira, Claire Chambers, Alexandra Gavura, Scott Hoch, Jeffrey Mercer, Rebecca E Dai, Wei Fang Beca, Jaclyn Tadrous, Mina Isaranuwatchai, Wanrudee BMJ Open Health Economics BACKGROUND: Oncology therapy is becoming increasingly more expensive and challenging the affordability and sustainability of drug programmes around the world. When new drugs are evaluated, health technology assessment organisations rely on clinical trials to inform funding decisions. However, clinical trials are not able to assess overall survival and generalises evidence in a real-world setting. As a result, policy makers have little information on whether drug funding decisions based on clinical trials ultimately yield the outcomes and value for money that might be expected. OBJECTIVE: The Canadian Real-world Evidence for Value of Cancer Drugs (CanREValue) collaboration, consisting of researchers, recommendation-makers, decision makers, payers, patients and caregivers, are developing and testing a framework for Canadian provinces to generate and use real-world evidence (RWE) for cancer drug funding in a consistent and integrated manner. STRATEGY: The CanREValue collaboration has established five formal working groups (WGs) to focus on specific processes in the generation and use of RWE for cancer drug funding decisions in Canada. The different RWE WGs are: (1) Planning and Drug Selection; (2) Methods; (3) Data; (4) Reassessment and Uptake; (5) Engagement. These WGs are acting collaboratively to develop a framework for RWE evaluation, validate the framework through the multiprovince RWE projects and help to integrate the final RWE framework into the Canadian healthcare system. OUTCOMES: The framework will enable the reassessment of cancer drugs, refinement of funding recommendations and use of novel funding mechanisms by decision-makers/payers across Canada to ensure the healthcare system is providing clinical benefits and value for money. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-01-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6955501/ /pubmed/31915169 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032884 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Health Economics Chan, Kelvin Nam, Seungree Evans, Bill de Oliveira, Claire Chambers, Alexandra Gavura, Scott Hoch, Jeffrey Mercer, Rebecca E Dai, Wei Fang Beca, Jaclyn Tadrous, Mina Isaranuwatchai, Wanrudee Developing a framework to incorporate real-world evidence in cancer drug funding decisions: the Canadian Real-world Evidence for Value of Cancer Drugs (CanREValue) collaboration |
title | Developing a framework to incorporate real-world evidence in cancer drug funding decisions: the Canadian Real-world Evidence for Value of Cancer Drugs (CanREValue) collaboration |
title_full | Developing a framework to incorporate real-world evidence in cancer drug funding decisions: the Canadian Real-world Evidence for Value of Cancer Drugs (CanREValue) collaboration |
title_fullStr | Developing a framework to incorporate real-world evidence in cancer drug funding decisions: the Canadian Real-world Evidence for Value of Cancer Drugs (CanREValue) collaboration |
title_full_unstemmed | Developing a framework to incorporate real-world evidence in cancer drug funding decisions: the Canadian Real-world Evidence for Value of Cancer Drugs (CanREValue) collaboration |
title_short | Developing a framework to incorporate real-world evidence in cancer drug funding decisions: the Canadian Real-world Evidence for Value of Cancer Drugs (CanREValue) collaboration |
title_sort | developing a framework to incorporate real-world evidence in cancer drug funding decisions: the canadian real-world evidence for value of cancer drugs (canrevalue) collaboration |
topic | Health Economics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6955501/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31915169 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032884 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chankelvin developingaframeworktoincorporaterealworldevidenceincancerdrugfundingdecisionsthecanadianrealworldevidenceforvalueofcancerdrugscanrevaluecollaboration AT namseungree developingaframeworktoincorporaterealworldevidenceincancerdrugfundingdecisionsthecanadianrealworldevidenceforvalueofcancerdrugscanrevaluecollaboration AT evansbill developingaframeworktoincorporaterealworldevidenceincancerdrugfundingdecisionsthecanadianrealworldevidenceforvalueofcancerdrugscanrevaluecollaboration AT deoliveiraclaire developingaframeworktoincorporaterealworldevidenceincancerdrugfundingdecisionsthecanadianrealworldevidenceforvalueofcancerdrugscanrevaluecollaboration AT chambersalexandra developingaframeworktoincorporaterealworldevidenceincancerdrugfundingdecisionsthecanadianrealworldevidenceforvalueofcancerdrugscanrevaluecollaboration AT gavurascott developingaframeworktoincorporaterealworldevidenceincancerdrugfundingdecisionsthecanadianrealworldevidenceforvalueofcancerdrugscanrevaluecollaboration AT hochjeffrey developingaframeworktoincorporaterealworldevidenceincancerdrugfundingdecisionsthecanadianrealworldevidenceforvalueofcancerdrugscanrevaluecollaboration AT mercerrebeccae developingaframeworktoincorporaterealworldevidenceincancerdrugfundingdecisionsthecanadianrealworldevidenceforvalueofcancerdrugscanrevaluecollaboration AT daiweifang developingaframeworktoincorporaterealworldevidenceincancerdrugfundingdecisionsthecanadianrealworldevidenceforvalueofcancerdrugscanrevaluecollaboration AT becajaclyn developingaframeworktoincorporaterealworldevidenceincancerdrugfundingdecisionsthecanadianrealworldevidenceforvalueofcancerdrugscanrevaluecollaboration AT tadrousmina developingaframeworktoincorporaterealworldevidenceincancerdrugfundingdecisionsthecanadianrealworldevidenceforvalueofcancerdrugscanrevaluecollaboration AT isaranuwatchaiwanrudee developingaframeworktoincorporaterealworldevidenceincancerdrugfundingdecisionsthecanadianrealworldevidenceforvalueofcancerdrugscanrevaluecollaboration |