Cargando…
Potentially inappropriate prescribing in dementia: a state-of-the-art review since 2007
OBJECTIVES: Dementia frequently occurs alongside comorbidities. Coexisting conditions are often managed with multiple medications, leading to increased risk of potentially inappropriate medication and adverse drug reactions. We aimed to estimate prevalence of, and identify factors reported to be ass...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6955517/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31900263 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029172 |
_version_ | 1783486946920628224 |
---|---|
author | Delgado, Joao Bowman, Kirsty Clare, Linda |
author_facet | Delgado, Joao Bowman, Kirsty Clare, Linda |
author_sort | Delgado, Joao |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Dementia frequently occurs alongside comorbidities. Coexisting conditions are often managed with multiple medications, leading to increased risk of potentially inappropriate medication and adverse drug reactions. We aimed to estimate prevalence of, and identify factors reported to be associated with, potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) for older individuals diagnosed with dementia. DESIGN: We used a state-of-the-art review approach, selecting papers written in English and published from 2007 to January 2018. Publications were retrieved from Scopus and Web of Science databases. Inclusion criteria included a formal diagnosis of dementia, a formal classification of PIP and reported prevalence of PIP as an outcome. Random effects models were used to provide a pooled estimate of prevalence of PIP. The Appraisal tool for Cross-Sectional Studies (AXIS tool) was used to assess bias in the included studies. RESULTS: The bibliographic search yielded 221 citations, with 12 studies meeting the inclusion criteria. The estimates of PIP prevalence for people living with dementia ranged from 14% to 64%. Prevalence was 31% (95% CI 9 to 52) in the community, and 42% (95% CI 30 to 55) in nursing/care homes. PIP included prescribing likely related to dementia (eg, hypnotics and sedative and cholinesterase inhibitors) and prescribing related to treatment of comorbidities (eg, cardiovascular drugs and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medication). Higher levels of comorbidity were associated with increased risk of PIP; however, only one study investigated associations with specific comorbidities of dementia. CONCLUSION: PIP remains a significant issue in healthcare management for people living with dementia. Higher levels of comorbidity are associated with increased prevalence of PIP, but the specific conditions driving this increase remain unknown. Further work is necessary to investigate PIP related to the presence of common comorbidities in patients living with dementia. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6955517 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69555172020-01-27 Potentially inappropriate prescribing in dementia: a state-of-the-art review since 2007 Delgado, Joao Bowman, Kirsty Clare, Linda BMJ Open General practice / Family practice OBJECTIVES: Dementia frequently occurs alongside comorbidities. Coexisting conditions are often managed with multiple medications, leading to increased risk of potentially inappropriate medication and adverse drug reactions. We aimed to estimate prevalence of, and identify factors reported to be associated with, potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) for older individuals diagnosed with dementia. DESIGN: We used a state-of-the-art review approach, selecting papers written in English and published from 2007 to January 2018. Publications were retrieved from Scopus and Web of Science databases. Inclusion criteria included a formal diagnosis of dementia, a formal classification of PIP and reported prevalence of PIP as an outcome. Random effects models were used to provide a pooled estimate of prevalence of PIP. The Appraisal tool for Cross-Sectional Studies (AXIS tool) was used to assess bias in the included studies. RESULTS: The bibliographic search yielded 221 citations, with 12 studies meeting the inclusion criteria. The estimates of PIP prevalence for people living with dementia ranged from 14% to 64%. Prevalence was 31% (95% CI 9 to 52) in the community, and 42% (95% CI 30 to 55) in nursing/care homes. PIP included prescribing likely related to dementia (eg, hypnotics and sedative and cholinesterase inhibitors) and prescribing related to treatment of comorbidities (eg, cardiovascular drugs and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medication). Higher levels of comorbidity were associated with increased risk of PIP; however, only one study investigated associations with specific comorbidities of dementia. CONCLUSION: PIP remains a significant issue in healthcare management for people living with dementia. Higher levels of comorbidity are associated with increased prevalence of PIP, but the specific conditions driving this increase remain unknown. Further work is necessary to investigate PIP related to the presence of common comorbidities in patients living with dementia. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-01-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6955517/ /pubmed/31900263 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029172 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | General practice / Family practice Delgado, Joao Bowman, Kirsty Clare, Linda Potentially inappropriate prescribing in dementia: a state-of-the-art review since 2007 |
title | Potentially inappropriate prescribing in dementia: a state-of-the-art review since 2007 |
title_full | Potentially inappropriate prescribing in dementia: a state-of-the-art review since 2007 |
title_fullStr | Potentially inappropriate prescribing in dementia: a state-of-the-art review since 2007 |
title_full_unstemmed | Potentially inappropriate prescribing in dementia: a state-of-the-art review since 2007 |
title_short | Potentially inappropriate prescribing in dementia: a state-of-the-art review since 2007 |
title_sort | potentially inappropriate prescribing in dementia: a state-of-the-art review since 2007 |
topic | General practice / Family practice |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6955517/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31900263 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029172 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT delgadojoao potentiallyinappropriateprescribingindementiaastateoftheartreviewsince2007 AT bowmankirsty potentiallyinappropriateprescribingindementiaastateoftheartreviewsince2007 AT clarelinda potentiallyinappropriateprescribingindementiaastateoftheartreviewsince2007 |