Cargando…

B!RTH: a mixed-methods survey of audience members’ reflections of a global women’s health arts and science programme in England, Ireland, Scotland and Switzerland

OBJECTIVE: Public engagement and science communication are growing as an important forum in the design and dissemination of research. The B!RTH programme is a partnership that uses theatre in combination with scientific expert panel discussions to raise awareness about the global inequality in women...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McCauley, Mary, Thomas, Joanne, Connor, Cristianne, van den Broek, Nynke
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6955564/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31892641
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027531
_version_ 1783486957984153600
author McCauley, Mary
Thomas, Joanne
Connor, Cristianne
van den Broek, Nynke
author_facet McCauley, Mary
Thomas, Joanne
Connor, Cristianne
van den Broek, Nynke
author_sort McCauley, Mary
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Public engagement and science communication are growing as an important forum in the design and dissemination of research. The B!RTH programme is a partnership that uses theatre in combination with scientific expert panel discussions to raise awareness about the global inequality in women’s health and access to healthcare. As part of this project, we assessed the views and experiences of audiences participating in B!RTH events. DESIGN: We conducted a multi-site mixed-methods survey using paper-based questionnaires. SETTINGS: Data were collected at four B!RTH theatre and science events: Dublin (Ireland), Edinburgh (Scotland), Geneva (Switzerland) and Liverpool (England) after the performance of four plays and three expert panel discussions. PARTICIPANTS: All audience members. METHODS: Descriptive analysis was conducted for the responses to the closed-ended survey questions, and thematic analysis was used for written free text provided. RESULTS: The estimated response rate was 42%; 363 members of the audiences responded. Most respondents had been emotionally moved by the performances (92.8%) and felt challenged and provoked (80.7%). Many respondents (73.6%) agreed that their eyes had been opened by new ideas. Five themes emerged from the free-text analysis: (1) an expression of thanks and positive feedback on the content and performance of the plays, (2) the benefit of and innovative use of art and science, (3) personal feelings in response to the plays and panel discussions, (4) the need for action and (5) suggestions for use of the plays and panel discussions in schools and universities to ‘bring to life the human story behind the statistics’. CONCLUSIONS: The B!RTH programme highlights how art and science can be used in partnership and is an effective tool to engage the public, to deliver key messages and to raise awareness about inequalities in global maternal and reproductive healthcare issues.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6955564
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69555642020-01-27 B!RTH: a mixed-methods survey of audience members’ reflections of a global women’s health arts and science programme in England, Ireland, Scotland and Switzerland McCauley, Mary Thomas, Joanne Connor, Cristianne van den Broek, Nynke BMJ Open Obstetrics and Gynaecology OBJECTIVE: Public engagement and science communication are growing as an important forum in the design and dissemination of research. The B!RTH programme is a partnership that uses theatre in combination with scientific expert panel discussions to raise awareness about the global inequality in women’s health and access to healthcare. As part of this project, we assessed the views and experiences of audiences participating in B!RTH events. DESIGN: We conducted a multi-site mixed-methods survey using paper-based questionnaires. SETTINGS: Data were collected at four B!RTH theatre and science events: Dublin (Ireland), Edinburgh (Scotland), Geneva (Switzerland) and Liverpool (England) after the performance of four plays and three expert panel discussions. PARTICIPANTS: All audience members. METHODS: Descriptive analysis was conducted for the responses to the closed-ended survey questions, and thematic analysis was used for written free text provided. RESULTS: The estimated response rate was 42%; 363 members of the audiences responded. Most respondents had been emotionally moved by the performances (92.8%) and felt challenged and provoked (80.7%). Many respondents (73.6%) agreed that their eyes had been opened by new ideas. Five themes emerged from the free-text analysis: (1) an expression of thanks and positive feedback on the content and performance of the plays, (2) the benefit of and innovative use of art and science, (3) personal feelings in response to the plays and panel discussions, (4) the need for action and (5) suggestions for use of the plays and panel discussions in schools and universities to ‘bring to life the human story behind the statistics’. CONCLUSIONS: The B!RTH programme highlights how art and science can be used in partnership and is an effective tool to engage the public, to deliver key messages and to raise awareness about inequalities in global maternal and reproductive healthcare issues. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-12-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6955564/ /pubmed/31892641 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027531 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Obstetrics and Gynaecology
McCauley, Mary
Thomas, Joanne
Connor, Cristianne
van den Broek, Nynke
B!RTH: a mixed-methods survey of audience members’ reflections of a global women’s health arts and science programme in England, Ireland, Scotland and Switzerland
title B!RTH: a mixed-methods survey of audience members’ reflections of a global women’s health arts and science programme in England, Ireland, Scotland and Switzerland
title_full B!RTH: a mixed-methods survey of audience members’ reflections of a global women’s health arts and science programme in England, Ireland, Scotland and Switzerland
title_fullStr B!RTH: a mixed-methods survey of audience members’ reflections of a global women’s health arts and science programme in England, Ireland, Scotland and Switzerland
title_full_unstemmed B!RTH: a mixed-methods survey of audience members’ reflections of a global women’s health arts and science programme in England, Ireland, Scotland and Switzerland
title_short B!RTH: a mixed-methods survey of audience members’ reflections of a global women’s health arts and science programme in England, Ireland, Scotland and Switzerland
title_sort b!rth: a mixed-methods survey of audience members’ reflections of a global women’s health arts and science programme in england, ireland, scotland and switzerland
topic Obstetrics and Gynaecology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6955564/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31892641
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027531
work_keys_str_mv AT mccauleymary brthamixedmethodssurveyofaudiencemembersreflectionsofaglobalwomenshealthartsandscienceprogrammeinenglandirelandscotlandandswitzerland
AT thomasjoanne brthamixedmethodssurveyofaudiencemembersreflectionsofaglobalwomenshealthartsandscienceprogrammeinenglandirelandscotlandandswitzerland
AT connorcristianne brthamixedmethodssurveyofaudiencemembersreflectionsofaglobalwomenshealthartsandscienceprogrammeinenglandirelandscotlandandswitzerland
AT vandenbroeknynke brthamixedmethodssurveyofaudiencemembersreflectionsofaglobalwomenshealthartsandscienceprogrammeinenglandirelandscotlandandswitzerland