Cargando…
B!RTH: a mixed-methods survey of audience members’ reflections of a global women’s health arts and science programme in England, Ireland, Scotland and Switzerland
OBJECTIVE: Public engagement and science communication are growing as an important forum in the design and dissemination of research. The B!RTH programme is a partnership that uses theatre in combination with scientific expert panel discussions to raise awareness about the global inequality in women...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6955564/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31892641 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027531 |
_version_ | 1783486957984153600 |
---|---|
author | McCauley, Mary Thomas, Joanne Connor, Cristianne van den Broek, Nynke |
author_facet | McCauley, Mary Thomas, Joanne Connor, Cristianne van den Broek, Nynke |
author_sort | McCauley, Mary |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Public engagement and science communication are growing as an important forum in the design and dissemination of research. The B!RTH programme is a partnership that uses theatre in combination with scientific expert panel discussions to raise awareness about the global inequality in women’s health and access to healthcare. As part of this project, we assessed the views and experiences of audiences participating in B!RTH events. DESIGN: We conducted a multi-site mixed-methods survey using paper-based questionnaires. SETTINGS: Data were collected at four B!RTH theatre and science events: Dublin (Ireland), Edinburgh (Scotland), Geneva (Switzerland) and Liverpool (England) after the performance of four plays and three expert panel discussions. PARTICIPANTS: All audience members. METHODS: Descriptive analysis was conducted for the responses to the closed-ended survey questions, and thematic analysis was used for written free text provided. RESULTS: The estimated response rate was 42%; 363 members of the audiences responded. Most respondents had been emotionally moved by the performances (92.8%) and felt challenged and provoked (80.7%). Many respondents (73.6%) agreed that their eyes had been opened by new ideas. Five themes emerged from the free-text analysis: (1) an expression of thanks and positive feedback on the content and performance of the plays, (2) the benefit of and innovative use of art and science, (3) personal feelings in response to the plays and panel discussions, (4) the need for action and (5) suggestions for use of the plays and panel discussions in schools and universities to ‘bring to life the human story behind the statistics’. CONCLUSIONS: The B!RTH programme highlights how art and science can be used in partnership and is an effective tool to engage the public, to deliver key messages and to raise awareness about inequalities in global maternal and reproductive healthcare issues. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6955564 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69555642020-01-27 B!RTH: a mixed-methods survey of audience members’ reflections of a global women’s health arts and science programme in England, Ireland, Scotland and Switzerland McCauley, Mary Thomas, Joanne Connor, Cristianne van den Broek, Nynke BMJ Open Obstetrics and Gynaecology OBJECTIVE: Public engagement and science communication are growing as an important forum in the design and dissemination of research. The B!RTH programme is a partnership that uses theatre in combination with scientific expert panel discussions to raise awareness about the global inequality in women’s health and access to healthcare. As part of this project, we assessed the views and experiences of audiences participating in B!RTH events. DESIGN: We conducted a multi-site mixed-methods survey using paper-based questionnaires. SETTINGS: Data were collected at four B!RTH theatre and science events: Dublin (Ireland), Edinburgh (Scotland), Geneva (Switzerland) and Liverpool (England) after the performance of four plays and three expert panel discussions. PARTICIPANTS: All audience members. METHODS: Descriptive analysis was conducted for the responses to the closed-ended survey questions, and thematic analysis was used for written free text provided. RESULTS: The estimated response rate was 42%; 363 members of the audiences responded. Most respondents had been emotionally moved by the performances (92.8%) and felt challenged and provoked (80.7%). Many respondents (73.6%) agreed that their eyes had been opened by new ideas. Five themes emerged from the free-text analysis: (1) an expression of thanks and positive feedback on the content and performance of the plays, (2) the benefit of and innovative use of art and science, (3) personal feelings in response to the plays and panel discussions, (4) the need for action and (5) suggestions for use of the plays and panel discussions in schools and universities to ‘bring to life the human story behind the statistics’. CONCLUSIONS: The B!RTH programme highlights how art and science can be used in partnership and is an effective tool to engage the public, to deliver key messages and to raise awareness about inequalities in global maternal and reproductive healthcare issues. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-12-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6955564/ /pubmed/31892641 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027531 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Obstetrics and Gynaecology McCauley, Mary Thomas, Joanne Connor, Cristianne van den Broek, Nynke B!RTH: a mixed-methods survey of audience members’ reflections of a global women’s health arts and science programme in England, Ireland, Scotland and Switzerland |
title | B!RTH: a mixed-methods survey of audience members’ reflections of a global women’s health arts and science programme in England, Ireland, Scotland and Switzerland |
title_full | B!RTH: a mixed-methods survey of audience members’ reflections of a global women’s health arts and science programme in England, Ireland, Scotland and Switzerland |
title_fullStr | B!RTH: a mixed-methods survey of audience members’ reflections of a global women’s health arts and science programme in England, Ireland, Scotland and Switzerland |
title_full_unstemmed | B!RTH: a mixed-methods survey of audience members’ reflections of a global women’s health arts and science programme in England, Ireland, Scotland and Switzerland |
title_short | B!RTH: a mixed-methods survey of audience members’ reflections of a global women’s health arts and science programme in England, Ireland, Scotland and Switzerland |
title_sort | b!rth: a mixed-methods survey of audience members’ reflections of a global women’s health arts and science programme in england, ireland, scotland and switzerland |
topic | Obstetrics and Gynaecology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6955564/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31892641 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027531 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mccauleymary brthamixedmethodssurveyofaudiencemembersreflectionsofaglobalwomenshealthartsandscienceprogrammeinenglandirelandscotlandandswitzerland AT thomasjoanne brthamixedmethodssurveyofaudiencemembersreflectionsofaglobalwomenshealthartsandscienceprogrammeinenglandirelandscotlandandswitzerland AT connorcristianne brthamixedmethodssurveyofaudiencemembersreflectionsofaglobalwomenshealthartsandscienceprogrammeinenglandirelandscotlandandswitzerland AT vandenbroeknynke brthamixedmethodssurveyofaudiencemembersreflectionsofaglobalwomenshealthartsandscienceprogrammeinenglandirelandscotlandandswitzerland |