Cargando…

Efficacy of four vaginal progesterones for luteal phase support in frozen‐thawed embryo transfer cycles: A randomized clinical trial

PURPOSE: To investigate the efficacy of four vaginal progesterones, Lutinus, Utrogestan, Luteum, and Crinone, as luteal phase support (LPS) in frozen‐thawed embryo transfer (Frozen‐ET) cycles. METHODS: Patients undergoing autologous Frozen‐ET of one cleavage‐stage embryo or one blastocyst. Two hundr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shiba, Reiko, Kinutani, Masayuki, Okano, Shinichiro, Kawano, Reo, Kikkawa, Yuko
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6955584/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31956284
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rmb2.12300
_version_ 1783486962564333568
author Shiba, Reiko
Kinutani, Masayuki
Okano, Shinichiro
Kawano, Reo
Kikkawa, Yuko
author_facet Shiba, Reiko
Kinutani, Masayuki
Okano, Shinichiro
Kawano, Reo
Kikkawa, Yuko
author_sort Shiba, Reiko
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To investigate the efficacy of four vaginal progesterones, Lutinus, Utrogestan, Luteum, and Crinone, as luteal phase support (LPS) in frozen‐thawed embryo transfer (Frozen‐ET) cycles. METHODS: Patients undergoing autologous Frozen‐ET of one cleavage‐stage embryo or one blastocyst. Two hundred fifty‐nine Frozen‐ET cycles were randomized to four groups for LPS: Lutinus, Utrogestan, Luteum, and Crinone. The clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), fetal heartbeat rate (FHR), and miscarriage rate (MR) were analyzed using the Mann‐Whitney or Kruskal‐Wallis test and Fisher exact test. RESULTS: Two hundred thirty‐five Frozen‐ET cycles were analyzed: 63 cycles in the Lutinus group, 60 in the Utrogestan group, 56 in the Luteum group, and 56 in the Crinone group. No significant differences were observed between the four groups in CPR (Lutinus, Utrogestan, Luteum, and Crinone: 34.9%, 33.3%, 37.5%, and 35.7%, respectively; P = .976), FHR (26.9%, 31.6%, 30.3%, and 25.0%, respectively; P = .857), and MR (31.8%, 10.0%, 19.0%, and 30.0%, respectively; P = .306). Multivariate logistic regression analysis also revealed that there were no statistically significant differences between the four groups with regard to CPR, FHR, and MR. CONCLUSION: There was no clinically significant difference in pregnancy outcomes between the four vaginal progesterone groups for LPS in Frozen‐ET cycles.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6955584
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69555842020-01-17 Efficacy of four vaginal progesterones for luteal phase support in frozen‐thawed embryo transfer cycles: A randomized clinical trial Shiba, Reiko Kinutani, Masayuki Okano, Shinichiro Kawano, Reo Kikkawa, Yuko Reprod Med Biol Original Articles PURPOSE: To investigate the efficacy of four vaginal progesterones, Lutinus, Utrogestan, Luteum, and Crinone, as luteal phase support (LPS) in frozen‐thawed embryo transfer (Frozen‐ET) cycles. METHODS: Patients undergoing autologous Frozen‐ET of one cleavage‐stage embryo or one blastocyst. Two hundred fifty‐nine Frozen‐ET cycles were randomized to four groups for LPS: Lutinus, Utrogestan, Luteum, and Crinone. The clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), fetal heartbeat rate (FHR), and miscarriage rate (MR) were analyzed using the Mann‐Whitney or Kruskal‐Wallis test and Fisher exact test. RESULTS: Two hundred thirty‐five Frozen‐ET cycles were analyzed: 63 cycles in the Lutinus group, 60 in the Utrogestan group, 56 in the Luteum group, and 56 in the Crinone group. No significant differences were observed between the four groups in CPR (Lutinus, Utrogestan, Luteum, and Crinone: 34.9%, 33.3%, 37.5%, and 35.7%, respectively; P = .976), FHR (26.9%, 31.6%, 30.3%, and 25.0%, respectively; P = .857), and MR (31.8%, 10.0%, 19.0%, and 30.0%, respectively; P = .306). Multivariate logistic regression analysis also revealed that there were no statistically significant differences between the four groups with regard to CPR, FHR, and MR. CONCLUSION: There was no clinically significant difference in pregnancy outcomes between the four vaginal progesterone groups for LPS in Frozen‐ET cycles. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-09-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6955584/ /pubmed/31956284 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rmb2.12300 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Reproductive Medicine and Biology published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japan Society for Reproductive Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Shiba, Reiko
Kinutani, Masayuki
Okano, Shinichiro
Kawano, Reo
Kikkawa, Yuko
Efficacy of four vaginal progesterones for luteal phase support in frozen‐thawed embryo transfer cycles: A randomized clinical trial
title Efficacy of four vaginal progesterones for luteal phase support in frozen‐thawed embryo transfer cycles: A randomized clinical trial
title_full Efficacy of four vaginal progesterones for luteal phase support in frozen‐thawed embryo transfer cycles: A randomized clinical trial
title_fullStr Efficacy of four vaginal progesterones for luteal phase support in frozen‐thawed embryo transfer cycles: A randomized clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of four vaginal progesterones for luteal phase support in frozen‐thawed embryo transfer cycles: A randomized clinical trial
title_short Efficacy of four vaginal progesterones for luteal phase support in frozen‐thawed embryo transfer cycles: A randomized clinical trial
title_sort efficacy of four vaginal progesterones for luteal phase support in frozen‐thawed embryo transfer cycles: a randomized clinical trial
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6955584/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31956284
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rmb2.12300
work_keys_str_mv AT shibareiko efficacyoffourvaginalprogesteronesforlutealphasesupportinfrozenthawedembryotransfercyclesarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT kinutanimasayuki efficacyoffourvaginalprogesteronesforlutealphasesupportinfrozenthawedembryotransfercyclesarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT okanoshinichiro efficacyoffourvaginalprogesteronesforlutealphasesupportinfrozenthawedembryotransfercyclesarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT kawanoreo efficacyoffourvaginalprogesteronesforlutealphasesupportinfrozenthawedembryotransfercyclesarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT kikkawayuko efficacyoffourvaginalprogesteronesforlutealphasesupportinfrozenthawedembryotransfercyclesarandomizedclinicaltrial