Cargando…
Comparison of Aggregated N-of-1 Trials with Parallel and Crossover Randomized Controlled Trials Using Simulation Studies
Background: N-of-1 trials offer an innovative approach to delivering personalized clinical care together with population-level research. While increasingly used, these methods have raised some statistical concerns in the healthcare community. Methods: We discuss concerns of selection bias, carryover...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6955665/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31698799 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare7040137 |
_version_ | 1783486980290510848 |
---|---|
author | Blackston, J. Walker Chapple, Andrew G. McGree, James M. McDonald, Suzanne Nikles, Jane |
author_facet | Blackston, J. Walker Chapple, Andrew G. McGree, James M. McDonald, Suzanne Nikles, Jane |
author_sort | Blackston, J. Walker |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: N-of-1 trials offer an innovative approach to delivering personalized clinical care together with population-level research. While increasingly used, these methods have raised some statistical concerns in the healthcare community. Methods: We discuss concerns of selection bias, carryover effects from treatment, and trial data analysis conceptually, then rigorously evaluate concerns of effect sizes, power and sample size through simulation study. Four variance structures for patient heterogeneity and model error are considered in a series of 5000 simulated trials with 3 cycles, which compare aggregated N-of-1 trials to parallel randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and crossover trials. Results: Aggregated N-of-1 trials outperformed both traditional parallel RCT and crossover designs when these trial designs were simulated in terms of power and required sample size to obtain a given power. N-of-1 designs resulted in a higher type-I error probability than parallel RCT and cross over designs when moderate-to-strong carryover effects were not considered or in the presence of modeled selection bias. However, N-of-1 designs allowed better estimation of patient-level random effects. These results reinforce the need to account for these factors when planning N-of-1 trials. Conclusion: N-of-1 trial designs offer a rigorous method for advancing personalized medicine and healthcare with the potential to minimize costs and resources. Interventions can be tested with adequate power with far fewer patients than traditional RCT and crossover designs. Operating characteristics compare favorably to both traditional RCT and crossover designs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6955665 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69556652020-01-23 Comparison of Aggregated N-of-1 Trials with Parallel and Crossover Randomized Controlled Trials Using Simulation Studies Blackston, J. Walker Chapple, Andrew G. McGree, James M. McDonald, Suzanne Nikles, Jane Healthcare (Basel) Article Background: N-of-1 trials offer an innovative approach to delivering personalized clinical care together with population-level research. While increasingly used, these methods have raised some statistical concerns in the healthcare community. Methods: We discuss concerns of selection bias, carryover effects from treatment, and trial data analysis conceptually, then rigorously evaluate concerns of effect sizes, power and sample size through simulation study. Four variance structures for patient heterogeneity and model error are considered in a series of 5000 simulated trials with 3 cycles, which compare aggregated N-of-1 trials to parallel randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and crossover trials. Results: Aggregated N-of-1 trials outperformed both traditional parallel RCT and crossover designs when these trial designs were simulated in terms of power and required sample size to obtain a given power. N-of-1 designs resulted in a higher type-I error probability than parallel RCT and cross over designs when moderate-to-strong carryover effects were not considered or in the presence of modeled selection bias. However, N-of-1 designs allowed better estimation of patient-level random effects. These results reinforce the need to account for these factors when planning N-of-1 trials. Conclusion: N-of-1 trial designs offer a rigorous method for advancing personalized medicine and healthcare with the potential to minimize costs and resources. Interventions can be tested with adequate power with far fewer patients than traditional RCT and crossover designs. Operating characteristics compare favorably to both traditional RCT and crossover designs. MDPI 2019-11-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6955665/ /pubmed/31698799 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare7040137 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Blackston, J. Walker Chapple, Andrew G. McGree, James M. McDonald, Suzanne Nikles, Jane Comparison of Aggregated N-of-1 Trials with Parallel and Crossover Randomized Controlled Trials Using Simulation Studies |
title | Comparison of Aggregated N-of-1 Trials with Parallel and Crossover Randomized Controlled Trials Using Simulation Studies |
title_full | Comparison of Aggregated N-of-1 Trials with Parallel and Crossover Randomized Controlled Trials Using Simulation Studies |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Aggregated N-of-1 Trials with Parallel and Crossover Randomized Controlled Trials Using Simulation Studies |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Aggregated N-of-1 Trials with Parallel and Crossover Randomized Controlled Trials Using Simulation Studies |
title_short | Comparison of Aggregated N-of-1 Trials with Parallel and Crossover Randomized Controlled Trials Using Simulation Studies |
title_sort | comparison of aggregated n-of-1 trials with parallel and crossover randomized controlled trials using simulation studies |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6955665/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31698799 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare7040137 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT blackstonjwalker comparisonofaggregatednof1trialswithparallelandcrossoverrandomizedcontrolledtrialsusingsimulationstudies AT chappleandrewg comparisonofaggregatednof1trialswithparallelandcrossoverrandomizedcontrolledtrialsusingsimulationstudies AT mcgreejamesm comparisonofaggregatednof1trialswithparallelandcrossoverrandomizedcontrolledtrialsusingsimulationstudies AT mcdonaldsuzanne comparisonofaggregatednof1trialswithparallelandcrossoverrandomizedcontrolledtrialsusingsimulationstudies AT niklesjane comparisonofaggregatednof1trialswithparallelandcrossoverrandomizedcontrolledtrialsusingsimulationstudies |