Cargando…

Review on Immersion Vaccines for Fish: An Update 2019

Immersion vaccines are used for a variety of aquacultured fish to protect against infectious diseases caused by bacteria and viruses. During immersion vaccination the antigens are taken up by the skin, gills or gut and processed by the immune system, where the resulting response may lead to protecti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bøgwald, Jarl, Dalmo, Roy A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6955699/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31795391
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms7120627
_version_ 1783486988259688448
author Bøgwald, Jarl
Dalmo, Roy A.
author_facet Bøgwald, Jarl
Dalmo, Roy A.
author_sort Bøgwald, Jarl
collection PubMed
description Immersion vaccines are used for a variety of aquacultured fish to protect against infectious diseases caused by bacteria and viruses. During immersion vaccination the antigens are taken up by the skin, gills or gut and processed by the immune system, where the resulting response may lead to protection. The lack of classical secondary responses following repeated immersion vaccination may partly be explained by the limited uptake of antigens by immersion compared to injection. Administration of vaccines depends on the size of the fish. In most cases, immersion vaccination is inferior to injection vaccination with regard to achieved protection. However, injection is problematic in small fish, and fry as small as 0.5 gram may be immersion vaccinated when they are considered adaptively immunocompetent. Inactivated vaccines are, in many cases, weakly immunogenic, resulting in low protection after immersion vaccination. Therefore, during recent years, several studies have focused on different ways to augment the efficacy of these vaccines. Examples are booster vaccination, administration of immunostimulants/adjuvants, pretreatment with low frequency ultrasound, use of live attenuated and DNA vaccines, preincubation in hyperosmotic solutions, percutaneous application of a multiple puncture instrument and application of more suitable inactivation chemicals. Electrostatic coating with positively charged chitosan to obtain mucoadhesive vaccines and a more efficient delivery of inactivated vaccines has also been successful.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6955699
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69556992020-01-23 Review on Immersion Vaccines for Fish: An Update 2019 Bøgwald, Jarl Dalmo, Roy A. Microorganisms Review Immersion vaccines are used for a variety of aquacultured fish to protect against infectious diseases caused by bacteria and viruses. During immersion vaccination the antigens are taken up by the skin, gills or gut and processed by the immune system, where the resulting response may lead to protection. The lack of classical secondary responses following repeated immersion vaccination may partly be explained by the limited uptake of antigens by immersion compared to injection. Administration of vaccines depends on the size of the fish. In most cases, immersion vaccination is inferior to injection vaccination with regard to achieved protection. However, injection is problematic in small fish, and fry as small as 0.5 gram may be immersion vaccinated when they are considered adaptively immunocompetent. Inactivated vaccines are, in many cases, weakly immunogenic, resulting in low protection after immersion vaccination. Therefore, during recent years, several studies have focused on different ways to augment the efficacy of these vaccines. Examples are booster vaccination, administration of immunostimulants/adjuvants, pretreatment with low frequency ultrasound, use of live attenuated and DNA vaccines, preincubation in hyperosmotic solutions, percutaneous application of a multiple puncture instrument and application of more suitable inactivation chemicals. Electrostatic coating with positively charged chitosan to obtain mucoadhesive vaccines and a more efficient delivery of inactivated vaccines has also been successful. MDPI 2019-11-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6955699/ /pubmed/31795391 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms7120627 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Bøgwald, Jarl
Dalmo, Roy A.
Review on Immersion Vaccines for Fish: An Update 2019
title Review on Immersion Vaccines for Fish: An Update 2019
title_full Review on Immersion Vaccines for Fish: An Update 2019
title_fullStr Review on Immersion Vaccines for Fish: An Update 2019
title_full_unstemmed Review on Immersion Vaccines for Fish: An Update 2019
title_short Review on Immersion Vaccines for Fish: An Update 2019
title_sort review on immersion vaccines for fish: an update 2019
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6955699/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31795391
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms7120627
work_keys_str_mv AT bøgwaldjarl reviewonimmersionvaccinesforfishanupdate2019
AT dalmoroya reviewonimmersionvaccinesforfishanupdate2019