Cargando…
Quantitative CPP Evaluation from Risk Assessment Using Integrated Process Modeling
Risk assessments (RAs) are frequently conducted to assess the potential effect of process parameters (PPs) on product quality attributes (e.g., a critical quality attribute (CQA)). To evaluate the PPs criticality the risk priority number (RPN) for each PP is often calculated. This number is generate...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6955900/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31847142 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering6040114 |
_version_ | 1783487035567243264 |
---|---|
author | Borchert, Daniel Zahel, Thomas Thomassen, Yvonne E. Herwig, Christoph Suarez-Zuluaga, Diego A. |
author_facet | Borchert, Daniel Zahel, Thomas Thomassen, Yvonne E. Herwig, Christoph Suarez-Zuluaga, Diego A. |
author_sort | Borchert, Daniel |
collection | PubMed |
description | Risk assessments (RAs) are frequently conducted to assess the potential effect of process parameters (PPs) on product quality attributes (e.g., a critical quality attribute (CQA)). To evaluate the PPs criticality the risk priority number (RPN) for each PP is often calculated. This number is generated by the multiplication of three factors: severity, occurrence, and detectability. This mathematical operation may result in some potential errors due to the multiplication of ordinal scaled values and the assumption that the factors contribute equally to the PPs criticality. To avoid these misinterpretations and to assess the out of specification (OOS) probability of the drug substance, we present a novel and straightforward mathematical algorithm. This algorithm quantitatively describes the PPs effect on each CQA assessed within the RA. The transcription of severity and occurrence to model effect sizes and parameters distribution are the key elements of the herein developed approach. This approach can be applied to any conventional RA within the biopharmaceutical industry. We demonstrate that severity and occurrence contribute differently to the PP criticality and compare these results with the RPN number. Detectability is used in a final step to precisely sort the contribution of each factor. To illustrate, we show the misinterpretation risk of the PP critically by using the conventional RPN approach. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6955900 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69559002020-01-23 Quantitative CPP Evaluation from Risk Assessment Using Integrated Process Modeling Borchert, Daniel Zahel, Thomas Thomassen, Yvonne E. Herwig, Christoph Suarez-Zuluaga, Diego A. Bioengineering (Basel) Article Risk assessments (RAs) are frequently conducted to assess the potential effect of process parameters (PPs) on product quality attributes (e.g., a critical quality attribute (CQA)). To evaluate the PPs criticality the risk priority number (RPN) for each PP is often calculated. This number is generated by the multiplication of three factors: severity, occurrence, and detectability. This mathematical operation may result in some potential errors due to the multiplication of ordinal scaled values and the assumption that the factors contribute equally to the PPs criticality. To avoid these misinterpretations and to assess the out of specification (OOS) probability of the drug substance, we present a novel and straightforward mathematical algorithm. This algorithm quantitatively describes the PPs effect on each CQA assessed within the RA. The transcription of severity and occurrence to model effect sizes and parameters distribution are the key elements of the herein developed approach. This approach can be applied to any conventional RA within the biopharmaceutical industry. We demonstrate that severity and occurrence contribute differently to the PP criticality and compare these results with the RPN number. Detectability is used in a final step to precisely sort the contribution of each factor. To illustrate, we show the misinterpretation risk of the PP critically by using the conventional RPN approach. MDPI 2019-12-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6955900/ /pubmed/31847142 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering6040114 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Borchert, Daniel Zahel, Thomas Thomassen, Yvonne E. Herwig, Christoph Suarez-Zuluaga, Diego A. Quantitative CPP Evaluation from Risk Assessment Using Integrated Process Modeling |
title | Quantitative CPP Evaluation from Risk Assessment Using Integrated Process Modeling |
title_full | Quantitative CPP Evaluation from Risk Assessment Using Integrated Process Modeling |
title_fullStr | Quantitative CPP Evaluation from Risk Assessment Using Integrated Process Modeling |
title_full_unstemmed | Quantitative CPP Evaluation from Risk Assessment Using Integrated Process Modeling |
title_short | Quantitative CPP Evaluation from Risk Assessment Using Integrated Process Modeling |
title_sort | quantitative cpp evaluation from risk assessment using integrated process modeling |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6955900/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31847142 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering6040114 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT borchertdaniel quantitativecppevaluationfromriskassessmentusingintegratedprocessmodeling AT zahelthomas quantitativecppevaluationfromriskassessmentusingintegratedprocessmodeling AT thomassenyvonnee quantitativecppevaluationfromriskassessmentusingintegratedprocessmodeling AT herwigchristoph quantitativecppevaluationfromriskassessmentusingintegratedprocessmodeling AT suarezzuluagadiegoa quantitativecppevaluationfromriskassessmentusingintegratedprocessmodeling |