Cargando…

Quantitative CPP Evaluation from Risk Assessment Using Integrated Process Modeling

Risk assessments (RAs) are frequently conducted to assess the potential effect of process parameters (PPs) on product quality attributes (e.g., a critical quality attribute (CQA)). To evaluate the PPs criticality the risk priority number (RPN) for each PP is often calculated. This number is generate...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Borchert, Daniel, Zahel, Thomas, Thomassen, Yvonne E., Herwig, Christoph, Suarez-Zuluaga, Diego A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6955900/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31847142
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering6040114
_version_ 1783487035567243264
author Borchert, Daniel
Zahel, Thomas
Thomassen, Yvonne E.
Herwig, Christoph
Suarez-Zuluaga, Diego A.
author_facet Borchert, Daniel
Zahel, Thomas
Thomassen, Yvonne E.
Herwig, Christoph
Suarez-Zuluaga, Diego A.
author_sort Borchert, Daniel
collection PubMed
description Risk assessments (RAs) are frequently conducted to assess the potential effect of process parameters (PPs) on product quality attributes (e.g., a critical quality attribute (CQA)). To evaluate the PPs criticality the risk priority number (RPN) for each PP is often calculated. This number is generated by the multiplication of three factors: severity, occurrence, and detectability. This mathematical operation may result in some potential errors due to the multiplication of ordinal scaled values and the assumption that the factors contribute equally to the PPs criticality. To avoid these misinterpretations and to assess the out of specification (OOS) probability of the drug substance, we present a novel and straightforward mathematical algorithm. This algorithm quantitatively describes the PPs effect on each CQA assessed within the RA. The transcription of severity and occurrence to model effect sizes and parameters distribution are the key elements of the herein developed approach. This approach can be applied to any conventional RA within the biopharmaceutical industry. We demonstrate that severity and occurrence contribute differently to the PP criticality and compare these results with the RPN number. Detectability is used in a final step to precisely sort the contribution of each factor. To illustrate, we show the misinterpretation risk of the PP critically by using the conventional RPN approach.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6955900
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69559002020-01-23 Quantitative CPP Evaluation from Risk Assessment Using Integrated Process Modeling Borchert, Daniel Zahel, Thomas Thomassen, Yvonne E. Herwig, Christoph Suarez-Zuluaga, Diego A. Bioengineering (Basel) Article Risk assessments (RAs) are frequently conducted to assess the potential effect of process parameters (PPs) on product quality attributes (e.g., a critical quality attribute (CQA)). To evaluate the PPs criticality the risk priority number (RPN) for each PP is often calculated. This number is generated by the multiplication of three factors: severity, occurrence, and detectability. This mathematical operation may result in some potential errors due to the multiplication of ordinal scaled values and the assumption that the factors contribute equally to the PPs criticality. To avoid these misinterpretations and to assess the out of specification (OOS) probability of the drug substance, we present a novel and straightforward mathematical algorithm. This algorithm quantitatively describes the PPs effect on each CQA assessed within the RA. The transcription of severity and occurrence to model effect sizes and parameters distribution are the key elements of the herein developed approach. This approach can be applied to any conventional RA within the biopharmaceutical industry. We demonstrate that severity and occurrence contribute differently to the PP criticality and compare these results with the RPN number. Detectability is used in a final step to precisely sort the contribution of each factor. To illustrate, we show the misinterpretation risk of the PP critically by using the conventional RPN approach. MDPI 2019-12-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6955900/ /pubmed/31847142 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering6040114 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Borchert, Daniel
Zahel, Thomas
Thomassen, Yvonne E.
Herwig, Christoph
Suarez-Zuluaga, Diego A.
Quantitative CPP Evaluation from Risk Assessment Using Integrated Process Modeling
title Quantitative CPP Evaluation from Risk Assessment Using Integrated Process Modeling
title_full Quantitative CPP Evaluation from Risk Assessment Using Integrated Process Modeling
title_fullStr Quantitative CPP Evaluation from Risk Assessment Using Integrated Process Modeling
title_full_unstemmed Quantitative CPP Evaluation from Risk Assessment Using Integrated Process Modeling
title_short Quantitative CPP Evaluation from Risk Assessment Using Integrated Process Modeling
title_sort quantitative cpp evaluation from risk assessment using integrated process modeling
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6955900/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31847142
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering6040114
work_keys_str_mv AT borchertdaniel quantitativecppevaluationfromriskassessmentusingintegratedprocessmodeling
AT zahelthomas quantitativecppevaluationfromriskassessmentusingintegratedprocessmodeling
AT thomassenyvonnee quantitativecppevaluationfromriskassessmentusingintegratedprocessmodeling
AT herwigchristoph quantitativecppevaluationfromriskassessmentusingintegratedprocessmodeling
AT suarezzuluagadiegoa quantitativecppevaluationfromriskassessmentusingintegratedprocessmodeling