Cargando…
Establishment of a Screening Method for Epstein-Barr Virus-Associated Gastric Carcinoma by Droplet Digital PCR
Background: Epstein-Barr virus-associated gastric carcinoma (EBVaGC) is classified as one of the molecular subtypes of gastric cancer. We used droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) to enable highly sensitive and quantitative detection of EBV. Methods: EBV-DNA load was calculated based on...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6956032/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31795435 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms7120628 |
_version_ | 1783487066627112960 |
---|---|
author | Shuto, Takuya Nishikawa, Jun Shimokuri, Kanami Yanagi, Ayaka Takagi, Tatsuya Takagi, Fumiya Miura, Osamu Iida, Michihisa Nagano, Hiroaki Takemoto, Yoshihiro Harada, Eijiro Suehiro, Yutaka Yamasaki, Takahiro Okamoto, Takeshi Sakaida, Isao |
author_facet | Shuto, Takuya Nishikawa, Jun Shimokuri, Kanami Yanagi, Ayaka Takagi, Tatsuya Takagi, Fumiya Miura, Osamu Iida, Michihisa Nagano, Hiroaki Takemoto, Yoshihiro Harada, Eijiro Suehiro, Yutaka Yamasaki, Takahiro Okamoto, Takeshi Sakaida, Isao |
author_sort | Shuto, Takuya |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Epstein-Barr virus-associated gastric carcinoma (EBVaGC) is classified as one of the molecular subtypes of gastric cancer. We used droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) to enable highly sensitive and quantitative detection of EBV. Methods: EBV-DNA load was calculated based on the copy number of the BamH1-W fragment of EBV by ddPCR, and the cut-off value of EBV-DNA load was set. We conducted both ddPCR and EBER1 ISH to examine whether their results coincided in 158 gastric cancer specimens of unknown EBV status. We prepared 26 biopsy specimens and 49 serum samples including EBVaGC and assayed them by ddPCR. Results: The median values of EBV-DNA load for EBVaGC and EBV-negative control were 17.0 and 0.00308, respectively. A cut-off value of 0.032 was determined for which the sensitivity was 1. Among the 158 gastric cancer specimens, 14 lesions were judged as EBV-positive by the 0.032 cut-off value determined by ddPCR. The results of ddPCR and EBER1 ISH were in complete agreement. Even when using a biopsy specimen as a sample for ddPCR, the EBV-DNA load of all EBVaGCs was larger than the cut-off value. Conclusions: We established a new method of diagnosing EBVaGC from tissue samples by ddPCR. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6956032 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69560322020-01-23 Establishment of a Screening Method for Epstein-Barr Virus-Associated Gastric Carcinoma by Droplet Digital PCR Shuto, Takuya Nishikawa, Jun Shimokuri, Kanami Yanagi, Ayaka Takagi, Tatsuya Takagi, Fumiya Miura, Osamu Iida, Michihisa Nagano, Hiroaki Takemoto, Yoshihiro Harada, Eijiro Suehiro, Yutaka Yamasaki, Takahiro Okamoto, Takeshi Sakaida, Isao Microorganisms Article Background: Epstein-Barr virus-associated gastric carcinoma (EBVaGC) is classified as one of the molecular subtypes of gastric cancer. We used droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) to enable highly sensitive and quantitative detection of EBV. Methods: EBV-DNA load was calculated based on the copy number of the BamH1-W fragment of EBV by ddPCR, and the cut-off value of EBV-DNA load was set. We conducted both ddPCR and EBER1 ISH to examine whether their results coincided in 158 gastric cancer specimens of unknown EBV status. We prepared 26 biopsy specimens and 49 serum samples including EBVaGC and assayed them by ddPCR. Results: The median values of EBV-DNA load for EBVaGC and EBV-negative control were 17.0 and 0.00308, respectively. A cut-off value of 0.032 was determined for which the sensitivity was 1. Among the 158 gastric cancer specimens, 14 lesions were judged as EBV-positive by the 0.032 cut-off value determined by ddPCR. The results of ddPCR and EBER1 ISH were in complete agreement. Even when using a biopsy specimen as a sample for ddPCR, the EBV-DNA load of all EBVaGCs was larger than the cut-off value. Conclusions: We established a new method of diagnosing EBVaGC from tissue samples by ddPCR. MDPI 2019-11-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6956032/ /pubmed/31795435 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms7120628 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Shuto, Takuya Nishikawa, Jun Shimokuri, Kanami Yanagi, Ayaka Takagi, Tatsuya Takagi, Fumiya Miura, Osamu Iida, Michihisa Nagano, Hiroaki Takemoto, Yoshihiro Harada, Eijiro Suehiro, Yutaka Yamasaki, Takahiro Okamoto, Takeshi Sakaida, Isao Establishment of a Screening Method for Epstein-Barr Virus-Associated Gastric Carcinoma by Droplet Digital PCR |
title | Establishment of a Screening Method for Epstein-Barr Virus-Associated Gastric Carcinoma by Droplet Digital PCR |
title_full | Establishment of a Screening Method for Epstein-Barr Virus-Associated Gastric Carcinoma by Droplet Digital PCR |
title_fullStr | Establishment of a Screening Method for Epstein-Barr Virus-Associated Gastric Carcinoma by Droplet Digital PCR |
title_full_unstemmed | Establishment of a Screening Method for Epstein-Barr Virus-Associated Gastric Carcinoma by Droplet Digital PCR |
title_short | Establishment of a Screening Method for Epstein-Barr Virus-Associated Gastric Carcinoma by Droplet Digital PCR |
title_sort | establishment of a screening method for epstein-barr virus-associated gastric carcinoma by droplet digital pcr |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6956032/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31795435 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms7120628 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shutotakuya establishmentofascreeningmethodforepsteinbarrvirusassociatedgastriccarcinomabydropletdigitalpcr AT nishikawajun establishmentofascreeningmethodforepsteinbarrvirusassociatedgastriccarcinomabydropletdigitalpcr AT shimokurikanami establishmentofascreeningmethodforepsteinbarrvirusassociatedgastriccarcinomabydropletdigitalpcr AT yanagiayaka establishmentofascreeningmethodforepsteinbarrvirusassociatedgastriccarcinomabydropletdigitalpcr AT takagitatsuya establishmentofascreeningmethodforepsteinbarrvirusassociatedgastriccarcinomabydropletdigitalpcr AT takagifumiya establishmentofascreeningmethodforepsteinbarrvirusassociatedgastriccarcinomabydropletdigitalpcr AT miuraosamu establishmentofascreeningmethodforepsteinbarrvirusassociatedgastriccarcinomabydropletdigitalpcr AT iidamichihisa establishmentofascreeningmethodforepsteinbarrvirusassociatedgastriccarcinomabydropletdigitalpcr AT naganohiroaki establishmentofascreeningmethodforepsteinbarrvirusassociatedgastriccarcinomabydropletdigitalpcr AT takemotoyoshihiro establishmentofascreeningmethodforepsteinbarrvirusassociatedgastriccarcinomabydropletdigitalpcr AT haradaeijiro establishmentofascreeningmethodforepsteinbarrvirusassociatedgastriccarcinomabydropletdigitalpcr AT suehiroyutaka establishmentofascreeningmethodforepsteinbarrvirusassociatedgastriccarcinomabydropletdigitalpcr AT yamasakitakahiro establishmentofascreeningmethodforepsteinbarrvirusassociatedgastriccarcinomabydropletdigitalpcr AT okamototakeshi establishmentofascreeningmethodforepsteinbarrvirusassociatedgastriccarcinomabydropletdigitalpcr AT sakaidaisao establishmentofascreeningmethodforepsteinbarrvirusassociatedgastriccarcinomabydropletdigitalpcr |