Cargando…

The MIR 2018 Exam: Psychometric Study and Comparison with the Previous Nine Years

Background and Objectives: The aim of the present research is to study the questions used in the 2018 MIR exam (a test that allows access to specialized medical training in Spain), describe their psychometric properties, and evaluate their quality. Materials and Methods: This analysis is performed w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Baladrón, Jaime, Sánchez Lasheras, Fernando, Romeo Ladrero, José María, Villacampa, Tomás, Curbelo, José, Jiménez Fonseca, Paula, García Guerrero, Alberto
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6956110/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31756983
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina55120751
_version_ 1783487084750700544
author Baladrón, Jaime
Sánchez Lasheras, Fernando
Romeo Ladrero, José María
Villacampa, Tomás
Curbelo, José
Jiménez Fonseca, Paula
García Guerrero, Alberto
author_facet Baladrón, Jaime
Sánchez Lasheras, Fernando
Romeo Ladrero, José María
Villacampa, Tomás
Curbelo, José
Jiménez Fonseca, Paula
García Guerrero, Alberto
author_sort Baladrón, Jaime
collection PubMed
description Background and Objectives: The aim of the present research is to study the questions used in the 2018 MIR exam (a test that allows access to specialized medical training in Spain), describe their psychometric properties, and evaluate their quality. Materials and Methods: This analysis is performed with the help of classical test theory (CTT) and item response theory (IRT). The answers given to the test questions by a total of 3868 physicians are analyzed. Results: According to CTT, the average difficulty index for all of the test questions was 0.629, which falls into the acceptable category. The average difficulty index with correction for random effects was 0.515, which corresponds to a value within the optimal range. The mean discrimination index was 0.277, which is in the good category, while the mean point biserial correlation coefficient, with a value of 0.275 fits in the regular category. The values of difficulty and discrimination calculated according to the model of two parameters of the IRT seem adequate with average values of −0.389 and 0.677. The Cronbach alpha score obtained for the overall test was 0.944. This value is considered as very good. Conclusions: A decrease was observed in the average values of discrimination in the last three calls, which may be related to the greater proportion of Spanish graduates that take the exam in the same year of finalization of their studies in Medicine.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6956110
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69561102020-01-23 The MIR 2018 Exam: Psychometric Study and Comparison with the Previous Nine Years Baladrón, Jaime Sánchez Lasheras, Fernando Romeo Ladrero, José María Villacampa, Tomás Curbelo, José Jiménez Fonseca, Paula García Guerrero, Alberto Medicina (Kaunas) Article Background and Objectives: The aim of the present research is to study the questions used in the 2018 MIR exam (a test that allows access to specialized medical training in Spain), describe their psychometric properties, and evaluate their quality. Materials and Methods: This analysis is performed with the help of classical test theory (CTT) and item response theory (IRT). The answers given to the test questions by a total of 3868 physicians are analyzed. Results: According to CTT, the average difficulty index for all of the test questions was 0.629, which falls into the acceptable category. The average difficulty index with correction for random effects was 0.515, which corresponds to a value within the optimal range. The mean discrimination index was 0.277, which is in the good category, while the mean point biserial correlation coefficient, with a value of 0.275 fits in the regular category. The values of difficulty and discrimination calculated according to the model of two parameters of the IRT seem adequate with average values of −0.389 and 0.677. The Cronbach alpha score obtained for the overall test was 0.944. This value is considered as very good. Conclusions: A decrease was observed in the average values of discrimination in the last three calls, which may be related to the greater proportion of Spanish graduates that take the exam in the same year of finalization of their studies in Medicine. MDPI 2019-11-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6956110/ /pubmed/31756983 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina55120751 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Baladrón, Jaime
Sánchez Lasheras, Fernando
Romeo Ladrero, José María
Villacampa, Tomás
Curbelo, José
Jiménez Fonseca, Paula
García Guerrero, Alberto
The MIR 2018 Exam: Psychometric Study and Comparison with the Previous Nine Years
title The MIR 2018 Exam: Psychometric Study and Comparison with the Previous Nine Years
title_full The MIR 2018 Exam: Psychometric Study and Comparison with the Previous Nine Years
title_fullStr The MIR 2018 Exam: Psychometric Study and Comparison with the Previous Nine Years
title_full_unstemmed The MIR 2018 Exam: Psychometric Study and Comparison with the Previous Nine Years
title_short The MIR 2018 Exam: Psychometric Study and Comparison with the Previous Nine Years
title_sort mir 2018 exam: psychometric study and comparison with the previous nine years
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6956110/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31756983
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina55120751
work_keys_str_mv AT baladronjaime themir2018exampsychometricstudyandcomparisonwiththepreviousnineyears
AT sanchezlasherasfernando themir2018exampsychometricstudyandcomparisonwiththepreviousnineyears
AT romeoladrerojosemaria themir2018exampsychometricstudyandcomparisonwiththepreviousnineyears
AT villacampatomas themir2018exampsychometricstudyandcomparisonwiththepreviousnineyears
AT curbelojose themir2018exampsychometricstudyandcomparisonwiththepreviousnineyears
AT jimenezfonsecapaula themir2018exampsychometricstudyandcomparisonwiththepreviousnineyears
AT garciaguerreroalberto themir2018exampsychometricstudyandcomparisonwiththepreviousnineyears
AT baladronjaime mir2018exampsychometricstudyandcomparisonwiththepreviousnineyears
AT sanchezlasherasfernando mir2018exampsychometricstudyandcomparisonwiththepreviousnineyears
AT romeoladrerojosemaria mir2018exampsychometricstudyandcomparisonwiththepreviousnineyears
AT villacampatomas mir2018exampsychometricstudyandcomparisonwiththepreviousnineyears
AT curbelojose mir2018exampsychometricstudyandcomparisonwiththepreviousnineyears
AT jimenezfonsecapaula mir2018exampsychometricstudyandcomparisonwiththepreviousnineyears
AT garciaguerreroalberto mir2018exampsychometricstudyandcomparisonwiththepreviousnineyears