Cargando…
Gut Anaerobes Capable of Chicken Caecum Colonisation
Chicks in commercial production are highly sensitive to enteric infections and their resistance can be increased by administration of complex adult microbiota. However, it is not known which adult microbiota members are capable of colonising the caecum of newly hatched chicks. In this study, we ther...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6956218/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31766558 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms7120597 |
_version_ | 1783487109968953344 |
---|---|
author | Kubasova, Tereza Kollarcikova, Miloslava Crhanova, Magdalena Karasova, Daniela Cejkova, Darina Sebkova, Alena Matiasovicova, Jitka Faldynova, Marcela Sisak, Frantisek Babak, Vladimir Pokorna, Alexandra Cizek, Alois Rychlik, Ivan |
author_facet | Kubasova, Tereza Kollarcikova, Miloslava Crhanova, Magdalena Karasova, Daniela Cejkova, Darina Sebkova, Alena Matiasovicova, Jitka Faldynova, Marcela Sisak, Frantisek Babak, Vladimir Pokorna, Alexandra Cizek, Alois Rychlik, Ivan |
author_sort | Kubasova, Tereza |
collection | PubMed |
description | Chicks in commercial production are highly sensitive to enteric infections and their resistance can be increased by administration of complex adult microbiota. However, it is not known which adult microbiota members are capable of colonising the caecum of newly hatched chicks. In this study, we therefore orally inoculated chicks with pure cultures of 76 different bacterial isolates originating from chicken caecum on day 1 of life and determined their ability to colonise seven days later. The caecum of newly hatched chickens could be colonised by bacteria belonging to phyla Bacteroidetes, Proteobacteria, Synergistetes, or Verrucomicrobia, and isolates from class Negativicutes (phylum Firmicutes). On the other hand, we did not record colonisation with isolates from phyla Actinobacteria and Firmicutes (except for Negativicutes), including isolates from families Lachnospiraceae, Ruminococcaceae, Erysipelotrichaceae, and Lactobacillaceae. Representatives of genera commonly used in probiotics such as Lactobacillus, Enterococcus, or Bacillus therefore did not colonise the chicken intestinal tract after a single dose administration. Following challenge with Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis, the best protecting isolates increased the chicken’s resistance to S. Enteritidis only tenfold, which, however, means that none of the tested individual bacterial isolates on their own efficiently protected chicks against S. Enteritidis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6956218 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69562182020-01-23 Gut Anaerobes Capable of Chicken Caecum Colonisation Kubasova, Tereza Kollarcikova, Miloslava Crhanova, Magdalena Karasova, Daniela Cejkova, Darina Sebkova, Alena Matiasovicova, Jitka Faldynova, Marcela Sisak, Frantisek Babak, Vladimir Pokorna, Alexandra Cizek, Alois Rychlik, Ivan Microorganisms Article Chicks in commercial production are highly sensitive to enteric infections and their resistance can be increased by administration of complex adult microbiota. However, it is not known which adult microbiota members are capable of colonising the caecum of newly hatched chicks. In this study, we therefore orally inoculated chicks with pure cultures of 76 different bacterial isolates originating from chicken caecum on day 1 of life and determined their ability to colonise seven days later. The caecum of newly hatched chickens could be colonised by bacteria belonging to phyla Bacteroidetes, Proteobacteria, Synergistetes, or Verrucomicrobia, and isolates from class Negativicutes (phylum Firmicutes). On the other hand, we did not record colonisation with isolates from phyla Actinobacteria and Firmicutes (except for Negativicutes), including isolates from families Lachnospiraceae, Ruminococcaceae, Erysipelotrichaceae, and Lactobacillaceae. Representatives of genera commonly used in probiotics such as Lactobacillus, Enterococcus, or Bacillus therefore did not colonise the chicken intestinal tract after a single dose administration. Following challenge with Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis, the best protecting isolates increased the chicken’s resistance to S. Enteritidis only tenfold, which, however, means that none of the tested individual bacterial isolates on their own efficiently protected chicks against S. Enteritidis. MDPI 2019-11-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6956218/ /pubmed/31766558 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms7120597 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Kubasova, Tereza Kollarcikova, Miloslava Crhanova, Magdalena Karasova, Daniela Cejkova, Darina Sebkova, Alena Matiasovicova, Jitka Faldynova, Marcela Sisak, Frantisek Babak, Vladimir Pokorna, Alexandra Cizek, Alois Rychlik, Ivan Gut Anaerobes Capable of Chicken Caecum Colonisation |
title | Gut Anaerobes Capable of Chicken Caecum Colonisation |
title_full | Gut Anaerobes Capable of Chicken Caecum Colonisation |
title_fullStr | Gut Anaerobes Capable of Chicken Caecum Colonisation |
title_full_unstemmed | Gut Anaerobes Capable of Chicken Caecum Colonisation |
title_short | Gut Anaerobes Capable of Chicken Caecum Colonisation |
title_sort | gut anaerobes capable of chicken caecum colonisation |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6956218/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31766558 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms7120597 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kubasovatereza gutanaerobescapableofchickencaecumcolonisation AT kollarcikovamiloslava gutanaerobescapableofchickencaecumcolonisation AT crhanovamagdalena gutanaerobescapableofchickencaecumcolonisation AT karasovadaniela gutanaerobescapableofchickencaecumcolonisation AT cejkovadarina gutanaerobescapableofchickencaecumcolonisation AT sebkovaalena gutanaerobescapableofchickencaecumcolonisation AT matiasovicovajitka gutanaerobescapableofchickencaecumcolonisation AT faldynovamarcela gutanaerobescapableofchickencaecumcolonisation AT sisakfrantisek gutanaerobescapableofchickencaecumcolonisation AT babakvladimir gutanaerobescapableofchickencaecumcolonisation AT pokornaalexandra gutanaerobescapableofchickencaecumcolonisation AT cizekalois gutanaerobescapableofchickencaecumcolonisation AT rychlikivan gutanaerobescapableofchickencaecumcolonisation |