Cargando…

Severe, recurrent in-stent carotid restenosis: endovascular approach, risk factors. Results from a prospective academic registry of 2637 consecutive carotid artery stenting procedures (TARGET-CAS)

INTRODUCTION: Optimal management of severe carotid in-stent restenosis remains unknown. Prevalence and risk factors of first and recurrent carotid in-stent restenosis in the multi-stent approach have not been established yet. AIM: To evaluate the safety of different methods of endovascular treatment...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tekieli, Łukasz, Musiałek, Piotr, Kabłak-Ziembicka, Anna, Trystuła, Mariusz, Przewłocki, Tadeusz, Legutko, Jacek, Dzierwa, Karolina, Maciejewski, Damian, Michalski, Michał, Pieniążek, Piotr
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Termedia Publishing House 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6956450/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31933663
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/aic.2019.90221
_version_ 1783487153567694848
author Tekieli, Łukasz
Musiałek, Piotr
Kabłak-Ziembicka, Anna
Trystuła, Mariusz
Przewłocki, Tadeusz
Legutko, Jacek
Dzierwa, Karolina
Maciejewski, Damian
Michalski, Michał
Pieniążek, Piotr
author_facet Tekieli, Łukasz
Musiałek, Piotr
Kabłak-Ziembicka, Anna
Trystuła, Mariusz
Przewłocki, Tadeusz
Legutko, Jacek
Dzierwa, Karolina
Maciejewski, Damian
Michalski, Michał
Pieniążek, Piotr
author_sort Tekieli, Łukasz
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Optimal management of severe carotid in-stent restenosis remains unknown. Prevalence and risk factors of first and recurrent carotid in-stent restenosis in the multi-stent approach have not been established yet. AIM: To evaluate the safety of different methods of endovascular treatment of carotid in-stent restenosis/recurrent restenosis and to establish its rate and risk factors. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between January 2001 and June 2016, 2637 neuroprotected carotid artery stenting (CAS) procedures were performed in 2443 patients (men: 67.0%; mean age: 67.9 ±8.8 years, symptomatic: 45.5%). Doppler ultrasound (DUS) evaluation was performed at discharge, after 3–6 months, 12 months, and then annually. Peak systolic velocity of 2–3 and > 3.0 m/s as well as end diastolic velocity of 0.5–0.9 and > 0.9 m/s were DUS criteria for 50–69% and ≥ 70% carotid in-stent restenosis (ISR) respectively. For angiographically confirmed ≥ 70% stenosis balloon re-angioplasty was first line treatment. RESULTS: Out of 95 DUS detected > 50% ISR (95/2637; 3.6%), 53 were confirmed in angiography as ≥ 70% (53/2637; 2.0%, one total occlusion). All patients were treated with bare balloon (n = 19), drug-eluting balloon (n = 27) or stent-supported (n = 6) angioplasty. One procedure was complicated with stroke (1.9%). Angiographic diameter stenosis (DS) was reduced from 83 ±8.3% to 13 ±7.6% (p < 0.001). There were 13 cases of ≥ 70% recurrent ISR. Bilateral and high-grade stenosis were independent risk factors of restenosis. Initial Carotid Wallstent implantation was a risk factor of first and recurrent in-stent restenosis. CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular treatment of carotid in-stent restenosis is safe. Bilateral and high-grade carotid artery stenosis may increase the risk of restenosis. Initial Carotid Wallstent implantation may increase the risk of first and recurrent restenosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6956450
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Termedia Publishing House
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69564502020-01-13 Severe, recurrent in-stent carotid restenosis: endovascular approach, risk factors. Results from a prospective academic registry of 2637 consecutive carotid artery stenting procedures (TARGET-CAS) Tekieli, Łukasz Musiałek, Piotr Kabłak-Ziembicka, Anna Trystuła, Mariusz Przewłocki, Tadeusz Legutko, Jacek Dzierwa, Karolina Maciejewski, Damian Michalski, Michał Pieniążek, Piotr Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej Original Paper INTRODUCTION: Optimal management of severe carotid in-stent restenosis remains unknown. Prevalence and risk factors of first and recurrent carotid in-stent restenosis in the multi-stent approach have not been established yet. AIM: To evaluate the safety of different methods of endovascular treatment of carotid in-stent restenosis/recurrent restenosis and to establish its rate and risk factors. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between January 2001 and June 2016, 2637 neuroprotected carotid artery stenting (CAS) procedures were performed in 2443 patients (men: 67.0%; mean age: 67.9 ±8.8 years, symptomatic: 45.5%). Doppler ultrasound (DUS) evaluation was performed at discharge, after 3–6 months, 12 months, and then annually. Peak systolic velocity of 2–3 and > 3.0 m/s as well as end diastolic velocity of 0.5–0.9 and > 0.9 m/s were DUS criteria for 50–69% and ≥ 70% carotid in-stent restenosis (ISR) respectively. For angiographically confirmed ≥ 70% stenosis balloon re-angioplasty was first line treatment. RESULTS: Out of 95 DUS detected > 50% ISR (95/2637; 3.6%), 53 were confirmed in angiography as ≥ 70% (53/2637; 2.0%, one total occlusion). All patients were treated with bare balloon (n = 19), drug-eluting balloon (n = 27) or stent-supported (n = 6) angioplasty. One procedure was complicated with stroke (1.9%). Angiographic diameter stenosis (DS) was reduced from 83 ±8.3% to 13 ±7.6% (p < 0.001). There were 13 cases of ≥ 70% recurrent ISR. Bilateral and high-grade stenosis were independent risk factors of restenosis. Initial Carotid Wallstent implantation was a risk factor of first and recurrent in-stent restenosis. CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular treatment of carotid in-stent restenosis is safe. Bilateral and high-grade carotid artery stenosis may increase the risk of restenosis. Initial Carotid Wallstent implantation may increase the risk of first and recurrent restenosis. Termedia Publishing House 2019-12-08 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6956450/ /pubmed/31933663 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/aic.2019.90221 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Termedia Sp. z o. o. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License, allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Tekieli, Łukasz
Musiałek, Piotr
Kabłak-Ziembicka, Anna
Trystuła, Mariusz
Przewłocki, Tadeusz
Legutko, Jacek
Dzierwa, Karolina
Maciejewski, Damian
Michalski, Michał
Pieniążek, Piotr
Severe, recurrent in-stent carotid restenosis: endovascular approach, risk factors. Results from a prospective academic registry of 2637 consecutive carotid artery stenting procedures (TARGET-CAS)
title Severe, recurrent in-stent carotid restenosis: endovascular approach, risk factors. Results from a prospective academic registry of 2637 consecutive carotid artery stenting procedures (TARGET-CAS)
title_full Severe, recurrent in-stent carotid restenosis: endovascular approach, risk factors. Results from a prospective academic registry of 2637 consecutive carotid artery stenting procedures (TARGET-CAS)
title_fullStr Severe, recurrent in-stent carotid restenosis: endovascular approach, risk factors. Results from a prospective academic registry of 2637 consecutive carotid artery stenting procedures (TARGET-CAS)
title_full_unstemmed Severe, recurrent in-stent carotid restenosis: endovascular approach, risk factors. Results from a prospective academic registry of 2637 consecutive carotid artery stenting procedures (TARGET-CAS)
title_short Severe, recurrent in-stent carotid restenosis: endovascular approach, risk factors. Results from a prospective academic registry of 2637 consecutive carotid artery stenting procedures (TARGET-CAS)
title_sort severe, recurrent in-stent carotid restenosis: endovascular approach, risk factors. results from a prospective academic registry of 2637 consecutive carotid artery stenting procedures (target-cas)
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6956450/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31933663
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/aic.2019.90221
work_keys_str_mv AT tekieliłukasz severerecurrentinstentcarotidrestenosisendovascularapproachriskfactorsresultsfromaprospectiveacademicregistryof2637consecutivecarotidarterystentingprocedurestargetcas
AT musiałekpiotr severerecurrentinstentcarotidrestenosisendovascularapproachriskfactorsresultsfromaprospectiveacademicregistryof2637consecutivecarotidarterystentingprocedurestargetcas
AT kabłakziembickaanna severerecurrentinstentcarotidrestenosisendovascularapproachriskfactorsresultsfromaprospectiveacademicregistryof2637consecutivecarotidarterystentingprocedurestargetcas
AT trystułamariusz severerecurrentinstentcarotidrestenosisendovascularapproachriskfactorsresultsfromaprospectiveacademicregistryof2637consecutivecarotidarterystentingprocedurestargetcas
AT przewłockitadeusz severerecurrentinstentcarotidrestenosisendovascularapproachriskfactorsresultsfromaprospectiveacademicregistryof2637consecutivecarotidarterystentingprocedurestargetcas
AT legutkojacek severerecurrentinstentcarotidrestenosisendovascularapproachriskfactorsresultsfromaprospectiveacademicregistryof2637consecutivecarotidarterystentingprocedurestargetcas
AT dzierwakarolina severerecurrentinstentcarotidrestenosisendovascularapproachriskfactorsresultsfromaprospectiveacademicregistryof2637consecutivecarotidarterystentingprocedurestargetcas
AT maciejewskidamian severerecurrentinstentcarotidrestenosisendovascularapproachriskfactorsresultsfromaprospectiveacademicregistryof2637consecutivecarotidarterystentingprocedurestargetcas
AT michalskimichał severerecurrentinstentcarotidrestenosisendovascularapproachriskfactorsresultsfromaprospectiveacademicregistryof2637consecutivecarotidarterystentingprocedurestargetcas
AT pieniazekpiotr severerecurrentinstentcarotidrestenosisendovascularapproachriskfactorsresultsfromaprospectiveacademicregistryof2637consecutivecarotidarterystentingprocedurestargetcas