Cargando…

A prospective comparative study between concurrent chemoradiation with brachytherapy boost with concurrent chemoradiation alone in locally advanced cancer esophagus

CONTEXT: Carcinoma esophagus is a highly malignant disease with very low cure rate. Concurrent chemoradiation is the standard of care in patients deemed unfit for surgery. Intraluminal brachytherapy (ILRT) is effective for palliation of dysphagia and is also used as a boost to external beam radiothe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Tudu, Rajanigandha
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6956578/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31956613
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/sajc.sajc_63_19
_version_ 1783487175094960128
author Tudu, Rajanigandha
author_facet Tudu, Rajanigandha
author_sort Tudu, Rajanigandha
collection PubMed
description CONTEXT: Carcinoma esophagus is a highly malignant disease with very low cure rate. Concurrent chemoradiation is the standard of care in patients deemed unfit for surgery. Intraluminal brachytherapy (ILRT) is effective for palliation of dysphagia and is also used as a boost to external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) in curative intent. AIMS: The aim of the study was to compare the clinical outcome of definitive concurrent chemoradiation followed by ILRT boost with concurrent chemoradiation alone in locally advanced carcinoma esophagus in terms of tumor response and toxicities. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: A single institutional prospective study was carried out between January 2014 and June 2015. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Fifty-seven patients of locally advanced carcinoma esophagus were allocated to study and control arms. Both groups were treated with definitive concurrent chemoradiation with 44 Gy of EBRT. The chemotherapy consisted of injection cisplatin 70 mg/m(2) intravenous on day 1 with capecitabine 800 mg/m(2) b.i.d. daily from day 1 to 4 orally on days 1 and 22 of EBRT. After 2 weeks, the control group was treated with EBRT boost of 10 Gy in 5 fractions, while the study group received intraluminal high-dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy boost of 10 Gy in 2 fractions. No concurrent chemotherapy was administered during ILRT. The treatment outcome was assessed in terms of tumor response and toxicities using the CTCAE version 4.0 criteria. RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 10 months, the overall response rate was 89.2% in the control group (25/28) and 93.10% in the study group (27/29). Acute hematological and gastrointestinal toxicities were noted. CONCLUSIONS: HDR ILRT in combination with EBRT is effective for treating dysphagia in cancer esophagus with low incidence of severe complications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6956578
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69565782020-01-17 A prospective comparative study between concurrent chemoradiation with brachytherapy boost with concurrent chemoradiation alone in locally advanced cancer esophagus Tudu, Rajanigandha South Asian J Cancer ORIGINAL ARTICLE: GI Cancers CONTEXT: Carcinoma esophagus is a highly malignant disease with very low cure rate. Concurrent chemoradiation is the standard of care in patients deemed unfit for surgery. Intraluminal brachytherapy (ILRT) is effective for palliation of dysphagia and is also used as a boost to external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) in curative intent. AIMS: The aim of the study was to compare the clinical outcome of definitive concurrent chemoradiation followed by ILRT boost with concurrent chemoradiation alone in locally advanced carcinoma esophagus in terms of tumor response and toxicities. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: A single institutional prospective study was carried out between January 2014 and June 2015. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Fifty-seven patients of locally advanced carcinoma esophagus were allocated to study and control arms. Both groups were treated with definitive concurrent chemoradiation with 44 Gy of EBRT. The chemotherapy consisted of injection cisplatin 70 mg/m(2) intravenous on day 1 with capecitabine 800 mg/m(2) b.i.d. daily from day 1 to 4 orally on days 1 and 22 of EBRT. After 2 weeks, the control group was treated with EBRT boost of 10 Gy in 5 fractions, while the study group received intraluminal high-dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy boost of 10 Gy in 2 fractions. No concurrent chemotherapy was administered during ILRT. The treatment outcome was assessed in terms of tumor response and toxicities using the CTCAE version 4.0 criteria. RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 10 months, the overall response rate was 89.2% in the control group (25/28) and 93.10% in the study group (27/29). Acute hematological and gastrointestinal toxicities were noted. CONCLUSIONS: HDR ILRT in combination with EBRT is effective for treating dysphagia in cancer esophagus with low incidence of severe complications. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC6956578/ /pubmed/31956613 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/sajc.sajc_63_19 Text en Copyright: © 2019 The South Asian Journal of Cancer http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle ORIGINAL ARTICLE: GI Cancers
Tudu, Rajanigandha
A prospective comparative study between concurrent chemoradiation with brachytherapy boost with concurrent chemoradiation alone in locally advanced cancer esophagus
title A prospective comparative study between concurrent chemoradiation with brachytherapy boost with concurrent chemoradiation alone in locally advanced cancer esophagus
title_full A prospective comparative study between concurrent chemoradiation with brachytherapy boost with concurrent chemoradiation alone in locally advanced cancer esophagus
title_fullStr A prospective comparative study between concurrent chemoradiation with brachytherapy boost with concurrent chemoradiation alone in locally advanced cancer esophagus
title_full_unstemmed A prospective comparative study between concurrent chemoradiation with brachytherapy boost with concurrent chemoradiation alone in locally advanced cancer esophagus
title_short A prospective comparative study between concurrent chemoradiation with brachytherapy boost with concurrent chemoradiation alone in locally advanced cancer esophagus
title_sort prospective comparative study between concurrent chemoradiation with brachytherapy boost with concurrent chemoradiation alone in locally advanced cancer esophagus
topic ORIGINAL ARTICLE: GI Cancers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6956578/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31956613
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/sajc.sajc_63_19
work_keys_str_mv AT tudurajanigandha aprospectivecomparativestudybetweenconcurrentchemoradiationwithbrachytherapyboostwithconcurrentchemoradiationaloneinlocallyadvancedcanceresophagus
AT tudurajanigandha prospectivecomparativestudybetweenconcurrentchemoradiationwithbrachytherapyboostwithconcurrentchemoradiationaloneinlocallyadvancedcanceresophagus