Cargando…

Brief Education and a Conjoint Valuation Survey May Reduce Decisional Conflict Regarding Lung Cancer Screening

Background. Recent data and policy decisions have led to the availability of lung cancer screening (LCS) for individuals who are at increased risk of developing lung cancer. In establishing implementation policies, the US Preventive Services Task Force recommended and the Centers for Medicare and Me...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Studts, Jamie L., Thurer, Richard J., Brinker, Kory, Lillie, Sarah E., Byrne, Margaret M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6956606/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31976372
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2381468319891452
_version_ 1783487181085474816
author Studts, Jamie L.
Thurer, Richard J.
Brinker, Kory
Lillie, Sarah E.
Byrne, Margaret M.
author_facet Studts, Jamie L.
Thurer, Richard J.
Brinker, Kory
Lillie, Sarah E.
Byrne, Margaret M.
author_sort Studts, Jamie L.
collection PubMed
description Background. Recent data and policy decisions have led to the availability of lung cancer screening (LCS) for individuals who are at increased risk of developing lung cancer. In establishing implementation policies, the US Preventive Services Task Force recommended and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services required that individuals who meet eligibility criteria for LCS receive a patient counseling and shared decision-making consultation prior to LCS. Methods. This study evaluated the potential of a values clarification/preference elicitation exercise and brief educational intervention to reduce decisional conflict regarding LCS. Participants (N = 210) completing a larger online survey responded to a measure of decisional conflict prior to and following administration of a conjoint survey and brief educational narrative about LCS. The conjoint survey included 22 choice sets (two of which were holdout cards), incorporating 5 attributes with 17 levels. Results. Results pertaining to changes in decisional conflict showed that participants reported statistically significantly and clinically meaningful reductions in decisional conflict following administration of the brief educational narrative and conjoint survey across the total score (Δ = 29.30; d = 1.09) and all four decisional conflict subscales: Uncertainty (Δ = 27.75; d = 0.73), Informed (Δ = 35.32; d = 1.11), Values Clarity (Δ = 31.82; d = 0.85), and Support (Δ = 18.78; d = 0.66). Discussion. While the study design precludes differentiating the effects of the brief educational narrative and the conjoint survey, data suggest that these tools offer a reasonable approach to clarifying personal beliefs and perspectives regarding LCS participation. Given the complicated nature of LCS decisions and recent policies advocating informed and shared decision-making approaches, conjoint surveys should be evaluated as one of the tools that could help individuals make choices about LCS participation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6956606
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69566062020-01-23 Brief Education and a Conjoint Valuation Survey May Reduce Decisional Conflict Regarding Lung Cancer Screening Studts, Jamie L. Thurer, Richard J. Brinker, Kory Lillie, Sarah E. Byrne, Margaret M. MDM Policy Pract Original Article Background. Recent data and policy decisions have led to the availability of lung cancer screening (LCS) for individuals who are at increased risk of developing lung cancer. In establishing implementation policies, the US Preventive Services Task Force recommended and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services required that individuals who meet eligibility criteria for LCS receive a patient counseling and shared decision-making consultation prior to LCS. Methods. This study evaluated the potential of a values clarification/preference elicitation exercise and brief educational intervention to reduce decisional conflict regarding LCS. Participants (N = 210) completing a larger online survey responded to a measure of decisional conflict prior to and following administration of a conjoint survey and brief educational narrative about LCS. The conjoint survey included 22 choice sets (two of which were holdout cards), incorporating 5 attributes with 17 levels. Results. Results pertaining to changes in decisional conflict showed that participants reported statistically significantly and clinically meaningful reductions in decisional conflict following administration of the brief educational narrative and conjoint survey across the total score (Δ = 29.30; d = 1.09) and all four decisional conflict subscales: Uncertainty (Δ = 27.75; d = 0.73), Informed (Δ = 35.32; d = 1.11), Values Clarity (Δ = 31.82; d = 0.85), and Support (Δ = 18.78; d = 0.66). Discussion. While the study design precludes differentiating the effects of the brief educational narrative and the conjoint survey, data suggest that these tools offer a reasonable approach to clarifying personal beliefs and perspectives regarding LCS participation. Given the complicated nature of LCS decisions and recent policies advocating informed and shared decision-making approaches, conjoint surveys should be evaluated as one of the tools that could help individuals make choices about LCS participation. SAGE Publications 2020-01-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6956606/ /pubmed/31976372 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2381468319891452 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Article
Studts, Jamie L.
Thurer, Richard J.
Brinker, Kory
Lillie, Sarah E.
Byrne, Margaret M.
Brief Education and a Conjoint Valuation Survey May Reduce Decisional Conflict Regarding Lung Cancer Screening
title Brief Education and a Conjoint Valuation Survey May Reduce Decisional Conflict Regarding Lung Cancer Screening
title_full Brief Education and a Conjoint Valuation Survey May Reduce Decisional Conflict Regarding Lung Cancer Screening
title_fullStr Brief Education and a Conjoint Valuation Survey May Reduce Decisional Conflict Regarding Lung Cancer Screening
title_full_unstemmed Brief Education and a Conjoint Valuation Survey May Reduce Decisional Conflict Regarding Lung Cancer Screening
title_short Brief Education and a Conjoint Valuation Survey May Reduce Decisional Conflict Regarding Lung Cancer Screening
title_sort brief education and a conjoint valuation survey may reduce decisional conflict regarding lung cancer screening
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6956606/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31976372
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2381468319891452
work_keys_str_mv AT studtsjamiel briefeducationandaconjointvaluationsurveymayreducedecisionalconflictregardinglungcancerscreening
AT thurerrichardj briefeducationandaconjointvaluationsurveymayreducedecisionalconflictregardinglungcancerscreening
AT brinkerkory briefeducationandaconjointvaluationsurveymayreducedecisionalconflictregardinglungcancerscreening
AT lilliesarahe briefeducationandaconjointvaluationsurveymayreducedecisionalconflictregardinglungcancerscreening
AT byrnemargaretm briefeducationandaconjointvaluationsurveymayreducedecisionalconflictregardinglungcancerscreening