Cargando…

A global optimisation approach to range-restricted survey calibration

Survey calibration methods modify minimally sample weights to satisfy domain-level benchmark constraints (BC), e.g. census totals. This allows exploitation of auxiliary information to improve the representativeness of sample data (addressing coverage limitations, non-response) and the quality of sam...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Espuny-Pujol, Ferran, Morrissey, Karyn, Williamson, Paul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6956878/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31997857
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11222-017-9739-5
_version_ 1783487218647564288
author Espuny-Pujol, Ferran
Morrissey, Karyn
Williamson, Paul
author_facet Espuny-Pujol, Ferran
Morrissey, Karyn
Williamson, Paul
author_sort Espuny-Pujol, Ferran
collection PubMed
description Survey calibration methods modify minimally sample weights to satisfy domain-level benchmark constraints (BC), e.g. census totals. This allows exploitation of auxiliary information to improve the representativeness of sample data (addressing coverage limitations, non-response) and the quality of sample-based estimates of population parameters. Calibration methods may fail with samples presenting small/zero counts for some benchmark groups or when range restrictions (RR), such as positivity, are imposed to avoid unrealistic or extreme weights. User-defined modifications of BC/RR performed after encountering non-convergence allow little control on the solution, and penalisation approaches modelling infeasibility may not guarantee convergence. Paradoxically, this has led to underuse in calibration of highly disaggregated information, when available. We present an always-convergent flexible two-step global optimisation (GO) survey calibration approach. The feasibility of the calibration problem is assessed, and automatically controlled minimum errors in BC or changes in RR are allowed to guarantee convergence in advance, while preserving the good properties of calibration estimators. Modelling alternatives under different scenarios using various error/change and distance measures are formulated and discussed. The GO approach is validated by calibrating the weights of the 2012 Health Survey for England to a fine age–gender–region cross-tabulation (378 counts) from the 2011 Census in England and Wales. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s11222-017-9739-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6956878
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69568782020-01-27 A global optimisation approach to range-restricted survey calibration Espuny-Pujol, Ferran Morrissey, Karyn Williamson, Paul Stat Comput Article Survey calibration methods modify minimally sample weights to satisfy domain-level benchmark constraints (BC), e.g. census totals. This allows exploitation of auxiliary information to improve the representativeness of sample data (addressing coverage limitations, non-response) and the quality of sample-based estimates of population parameters. Calibration methods may fail with samples presenting small/zero counts for some benchmark groups or when range restrictions (RR), such as positivity, are imposed to avoid unrealistic or extreme weights. User-defined modifications of BC/RR performed after encountering non-convergence allow little control on the solution, and penalisation approaches modelling infeasibility may not guarantee convergence. Paradoxically, this has led to underuse in calibration of highly disaggregated information, when available. We present an always-convergent flexible two-step global optimisation (GO) survey calibration approach. The feasibility of the calibration problem is assessed, and automatically controlled minimum errors in BC or changes in RR are allowed to guarantee convergence in advance, while preserving the good properties of calibration estimators. Modelling alternatives under different scenarios using various error/change and distance measures are formulated and discussed. The GO approach is validated by calibrating the weights of the 2012 Health Survey for England to a fine age–gender–region cross-tabulation (378 counts) from the 2011 Census in England and Wales. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s11222-017-9739-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2017-03-21 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6956878/ /pubmed/31997857 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11222-017-9739-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Article
Espuny-Pujol, Ferran
Morrissey, Karyn
Williamson, Paul
A global optimisation approach to range-restricted survey calibration
title A global optimisation approach to range-restricted survey calibration
title_full A global optimisation approach to range-restricted survey calibration
title_fullStr A global optimisation approach to range-restricted survey calibration
title_full_unstemmed A global optimisation approach to range-restricted survey calibration
title_short A global optimisation approach to range-restricted survey calibration
title_sort global optimisation approach to range-restricted survey calibration
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6956878/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31997857
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11222-017-9739-5
work_keys_str_mv AT espunypujolferran aglobaloptimisationapproachtorangerestrictedsurveycalibration
AT morrisseykaryn aglobaloptimisationapproachtorangerestrictedsurveycalibration
AT williamsonpaul aglobaloptimisationapproachtorangerestrictedsurveycalibration
AT espunypujolferran globaloptimisationapproachtorangerestrictedsurveycalibration
AT morrisseykaryn globaloptimisationapproachtorangerestrictedsurveycalibration
AT williamsonpaul globaloptimisationapproachtorangerestrictedsurveycalibration