Cargando…

Identifying site- and stimulation-specific TMS-evoked EEG potentials using a quantitative cosine similarity metric

The ability to interpret transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)-evoked electroencephalography (EEG) potentials (TEPs) is limited by artifacts, such as auditory evoked responses produced by discharge of the TMS coil. TEPs generated from direct cortical stimulation should vary in their topographical...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Freedberg, Michael, Reeves, Jack A., Hussain, Sara J., Zaghloul, Kareem A., Wassermann, Eric M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6957143/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31929531
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216185
_version_ 1783487265937293312
author Freedberg, Michael
Reeves, Jack A.
Hussain, Sara J.
Zaghloul, Kareem A.
Wassermann, Eric M.
author_facet Freedberg, Michael
Reeves, Jack A.
Hussain, Sara J.
Zaghloul, Kareem A.
Wassermann, Eric M.
author_sort Freedberg, Michael
collection PubMed
description The ability to interpret transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)-evoked electroencephalography (EEG) potentials (TEPs) is limited by artifacts, such as auditory evoked responses produced by discharge of the TMS coil. TEPs generated from direct cortical stimulation should vary in their topographical activity pattern according to stimulation site and differ from responses to sham stimulation. Responses that do not show these effects are likely to be artifactual. In 20 healthy volunteers, we delivered active and sham TMS to the right prefrontal, left primary motor, and left posterior parietal cortex and compared the waveform similarity of TEPs between stimulation sites and active and sham TMS using a cosine similarity-based analysis method. We identified epochs after the stimulus when the spatial pattern of TMS-evoked activation showed greater than random similarity between stimulation sites and sham vs. active TMS, indicating the presence of a dominant artifact. To do this, we binarized the derivatives of the TEPs recorded from 30 EEG channels and calculated cosine similarity between conditions at each time point with millisecond resolution. Only TEP components occurring before approximately 80 ms differed across stimulation sites and between active and sham, indicating site and condition-specific responses. We therefore conclude that, in the absence of noise masking or other measures to decrease neural artifact, TEP components before about 80 ms can be safely interpreted as stimulation location-specific responses to TMS, but components beyond this latency should be interpreted with caution due to high similarity in their topographical activity pattern.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6957143
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69571432020-01-26 Identifying site- and stimulation-specific TMS-evoked EEG potentials using a quantitative cosine similarity metric Freedberg, Michael Reeves, Jack A. Hussain, Sara J. Zaghloul, Kareem A. Wassermann, Eric M. PLoS One Research Article The ability to interpret transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)-evoked electroencephalography (EEG) potentials (TEPs) is limited by artifacts, such as auditory evoked responses produced by discharge of the TMS coil. TEPs generated from direct cortical stimulation should vary in their topographical activity pattern according to stimulation site and differ from responses to sham stimulation. Responses that do not show these effects are likely to be artifactual. In 20 healthy volunteers, we delivered active and sham TMS to the right prefrontal, left primary motor, and left posterior parietal cortex and compared the waveform similarity of TEPs between stimulation sites and active and sham TMS using a cosine similarity-based analysis method. We identified epochs after the stimulus when the spatial pattern of TMS-evoked activation showed greater than random similarity between stimulation sites and sham vs. active TMS, indicating the presence of a dominant artifact. To do this, we binarized the derivatives of the TEPs recorded from 30 EEG channels and calculated cosine similarity between conditions at each time point with millisecond resolution. Only TEP components occurring before approximately 80 ms differed across stimulation sites and between active and sham, indicating site and condition-specific responses. We therefore conclude that, in the absence of noise masking or other measures to decrease neural artifact, TEP components before about 80 ms can be safely interpreted as stimulation location-specific responses to TMS, but components beyond this latency should be interpreted with caution due to high similarity in their topographical activity pattern. Public Library of Science 2020-01-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6957143/ /pubmed/31929531 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216185 Text en https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) public domain dedication.
spellingShingle Research Article
Freedberg, Michael
Reeves, Jack A.
Hussain, Sara J.
Zaghloul, Kareem A.
Wassermann, Eric M.
Identifying site- and stimulation-specific TMS-evoked EEG potentials using a quantitative cosine similarity metric
title Identifying site- and stimulation-specific TMS-evoked EEG potentials using a quantitative cosine similarity metric
title_full Identifying site- and stimulation-specific TMS-evoked EEG potentials using a quantitative cosine similarity metric
title_fullStr Identifying site- and stimulation-specific TMS-evoked EEG potentials using a quantitative cosine similarity metric
title_full_unstemmed Identifying site- and stimulation-specific TMS-evoked EEG potentials using a quantitative cosine similarity metric
title_short Identifying site- and stimulation-specific TMS-evoked EEG potentials using a quantitative cosine similarity metric
title_sort identifying site- and stimulation-specific tms-evoked eeg potentials using a quantitative cosine similarity metric
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6957143/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31929531
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216185
work_keys_str_mv AT freedbergmichael identifyingsiteandstimulationspecifictmsevokedeegpotentialsusingaquantitativecosinesimilaritymetric
AT reevesjacka identifyingsiteandstimulationspecifictmsevokedeegpotentialsusingaquantitativecosinesimilaritymetric
AT hussainsaraj identifyingsiteandstimulationspecifictmsevokedeegpotentialsusingaquantitativecosinesimilaritymetric
AT zaghloulkareema identifyingsiteandstimulationspecifictmsevokedeegpotentialsusingaquantitativecosinesimilaritymetric
AT wassermannericm identifyingsiteandstimulationspecifictmsevokedeegpotentialsusingaquantitativecosinesimilaritymetric