Cargando…

Compassion in the Clinical Context: Constrained, Distributed, and Adaptive

BACKGROUND: Compassion is intrinsically situated within particular contexts and how these contexts can shape compassion has not been well-described. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study was to describe how individual and contextual challenges can impact compassion within critical care and palliative...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Roze des Ordons, Amanda L., MacIsaac, Lori, Hui, Jacqueline, Everson, Joanna, Ellaway, Rachel H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6957623/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31637638
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-019-05467-9
_version_ 1783487337027600384
author Roze des Ordons, Amanda L.
MacIsaac, Lori
Hui, Jacqueline
Everson, Joanna
Ellaway, Rachel H.
author_facet Roze des Ordons, Amanda L.
MacIsaac, Lori
Hui, Jacqueline
Everson, Joanna
Ellaway, Rachel H.
author_sort Roze des Ordons, Amanda L.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Compassion is intrinsically situated within particular contexts and how these contexts can shape compassion has not been well-described. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study was to describe how individual and contextual challenges can impact compassion within critical care and palliative care settings. DESIGN: This qualitative study adopted phenomenology and autoethnography to inform data collection, and principles of activity theory and realist inquiry for data interpretation. PARTICIPANTS: Five clinicians who work in critical care (n = 3) and palliative care (n = 3) participated in the study. APPROACH: Qualitative data were obtained from ethnographic observations, interviews, and focus groups. Participants observed and recorded field notes (n = 53) on instances of suffering and compassion in their workplace settings. At the end of the study period, they participated in a focus group or individual interview to reflect on their experiences. Data was analyzed using constructivist grounded theory techniques and iteratively synthesized through group discussion and model building. KEY RESULTS: The findings reflected four phenomena associated with compassion in context: individual gaps and lapses in compassion, relational challenges, contextual constraints on compassion, and distributed compassion. Individual gaps and lapses in compassion involved inattention, intention vs. perception, personal capacity, and personal toll. Relational challenges included receptivity, fragmentation, and lack of shared understanding. Contextual constraints consisted of situational pressures, the clinical environment, gaps in education, and organizational culture. The distribution of compassion within teams and how teams adapt their behaviors in response to perceived needs for greater compassion modulated these challenges. CONCLUSIONS: The study illustrates the many ways in which compassion can be shaped by context and highlights the role of teamwork in identifying gaps and lapses in compassion and responding in a way that supports patients, families, and colleagues. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11606-019-05467-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6957623
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69576232020-05-15 Compassion in the Clinical Context: Constrained, Distributed, and Adaptive Roze des Ordons, Amanda L. MacIsaac, Lori Hui, Jacqueline Everson, Joanna Ellaway, Rachel H. J Gen Intern Med Original Research BACKGROUND: Compassion is intrinsically situated within particular contexts and how these contexts can shape compassion has not been well-described. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study was to describe how individual and contextual challenges can impact compassion within critical care and palliative care settings. DESIGN: This qualitative study adopted phenomenology and autoethnography to inform data collection, and principles of activity theory and realist inquiry for data interpretation. PARTICIPANTS: Five clinicians who work in critical care (n = 3) and palliative care (n = 3) participated in the study. APPROACH: Qualitative data were obtained from ethnographic observations, interviews, and focus groups. Participants observed and recorded field notes (n = 53) on instances of suffering and compassion in their workplace settings. At the end of the study period, they participated in a focus group or individual interview to reflect on their experiences. Data was analyzed using constructivist grounded theory techniques and iteratively synthesized through group discussion and model building. KEY RESULTS: The findings reflected four phenomena associated with compassion in context: individual gaps and lapses in compassion, relational challenges, contextual constraints on compassion, and distributed compassion. Individual gaps and lapses in compassion involved inattention, intention vs. perception, personal capacity, and personal toll. Relational challenges included receptivity, fragmentation, and lack of shared understanding. Contextual constraints consisted of situational pressures, the clinical environment, gaps in education, and organizational culture. The distribution of compassion within teams and how teams adapt their behaviors in response to perceived needs for greater compassion modulated these challenges. CONCLUSIONS: The study illustrates the many ways in which compassion can be shaped by context and highlights the role of teamwork in identifying gaps and lapses in compassion and responding in a way that supports patients, families, and colleagues. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11606-019-05467-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2019-10-21 2020-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6957623/ /pubmed/31637638 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-019-05467-9 Text en © Society of General Internal Medicine 2019
spellingShingle Original Research
Roze des Ordons, Amanda L.
MacIsaac, Lori
Hui, Jacqueline
Everson, Joanna
Ellaway, Rachel H.
Compassion in the Clinical Context: Constrained, Distributed, and Adaptive
title Compassion in the Clinical Context: Constrained, Distributed, and Adaptive
title_full Compassion in the Clinical Context: Constrained, Distributed, and Adaptive
title_fullStr Compassion in the Clinical Context: Constrained, Distributed, and Adaptive
title_full_unstemmed Compassion in the Clinical Context: Constrained, Distributed, and Adaptive
title_short Compassion in the Clinical Context: Constrained, Distributed, and Adaptive
title_sort compassion in the clinical context: constrained, distributed, and adaptive
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6957623/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31637638
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-019-05467-9
work_keys_str_mv AT rozedesordonsamandal compassionintheclinicalcontextconstraineddistributedandadaptive
AT macisaaclori compassionintheclinicalcontextconstraineddistributedandadaptive
AT huijacqueline compassionintheclinicalcontextconstraineddistributedandadaptive
AT eversonjoanna compassionintheclinicalcontextconstraineddistributedandadaptive
AT ellawayrachelh compassionintheclinicalcontextconstraineddistributedandadaptive