Cargando…
Delayed Complications Due to Polymer Coating Embolism after Endovascular Treatment
There have recently been reports of patients who developed postprocedural symptoms or alterations due to delayed foreign body embolisms observed in imaging findings. Polymer coating of devices have been described as a possible cause of foreign body embolisms, manifesting in delayed granulomatous res...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Japan Neurosurgical Society
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6957771/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31938675 http://dx.doi.org/10.2176/nmccrj.cr.2018-0319 |
_version_ | 1783487346742657024 |
---|---|
author | Kitamura, Takayuki Oishi, Hidenori Fujii, Takashi Teranishi, Kohsuke Yatomi, Kenji Yamamoto, Munetaka Arai, Hajime |
author_facet | Kitamura, Takayuki Oishi, Hidenori Fujii, Takashi Teranishi, Kohsuke Yatomi, Kenji Yamamoto, Munetaka Arai, Hajime |
author_sort | Kitamura, Takayuki |
collection | PubMed |
description | There have recently been reports of patients who developed postprocedural symptoms or alterations due to delayed foreign body embolisms observed in imaging findings. Polymer coating of devices have been described as a possible cause of foreign body embolisms, manifesting in delayed granulomatous responses and exhibiting characteristic imaging findings. In four of 4,025 patients who underwent coil embolization in our hospital or its affiliated facilities, similar findings were observed. Delayed lesions appeared between 1 month and 1 year after the procedures. There was extensive edema in the perfusion area of the treated vessels. In two cases examined by contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging, multiple solid enhancing lesions within vasogenic edema were observed. Biopsy revealed a membranous foreign body in a blood vessel with surrounding foreign body granuloma formation in 1 case. Because these findings are similar to those of cases reported previously, they were considered as a foreign body embolism due to coating separations from the devices. Polymer coating separation occurs most frequently from guidewires. Especially if a metal introducer is used, the risk of separation increases. Surgeons should carefully follow the manufacturers’ instructions when they use these devices and should acknowledge and report any events that may occur. Although these complications are extremely rare, further studies are warranted of similar cases; and we should prepare and share information on these intravascular devices for wide-scale dissemination in the industry. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6957771 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | The Japan Neurosurgical Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69577712020-01-14 Delayed Complications Due to Polymer Coating Embolism after Endovascular Treatment Kitamura, Takayuki Oishi, Hidenori Fujii, Takashi Teranishi, Kohsuke Yatomi, Kenji Yamamoto, Munetaka Arai, Hajime NMC Case Rep J Case Report There have recently been reports of patients who developed postprocedural symptoms or alterations due to delayed foreign body embolisms observed in imaging findings. Polymer coating of devices have been described as a possible cause of foreign body embolisms, manifesting in delayed granulomatous responses and exhibiting characteristic imaging findings. In four of 4,025 patients who underwent coil embolization in our hospital or its affiliated facilities, similar findings were observed. Delayed lesions appeared between 1 month and 1 year after the procedures. There was extensive edema in the perfusion area of the treated vessels. In two cases examined by contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging, multiple solid enhancing lesions within vasogenic edema were observed. Biopsy revealed a membranous foreign body in a blood vessel with surrounding foreign body granuloma formation in 1 case. Because these findings are similar to those of cases reported previously, they were considered as a foreign body embolism due to coating separations from the devices. Polymer coating separation occurs most frequently from guidewires. Especially if a metal introducer is used, the risk of separation increases. Surgeons should carefully follow the manufacturers’ instructions when they use these devices and should acknowledge and report any events that may occur. Although these complications are extremely rare, further studies are warranted of similar cases; and we should prepare and share information on these intravascular devices for wide-scale dissemination in the industry. The Japan Neurosurgical Society 2019-12-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6957771/ /pubmed/31938675 http://dx.doi.org/10.2176/nmccrj.cr.2018-0319 Text en © 2020 The Japan Neurosurgical Society This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Case Report Kitamura, Takayuki Oishi, Hidenori Fujii, Takashi Teranishi, Kohsuke Yatomi, Kenji Yamamoto, Munetaka Arai, Hajime Delayed Complications Due to Polymer Coating Embolism after Endovascular Treatment |
title | Delayed Complications Due to Polymer Coating Embolism after Endovascular Treatment |
title_full | Delayed Complications Due to Polymer Coating Embolism after Endovascular Treatment |
title_fullStr | Delayed Complications Due to Polymer Coating Embolism after Endovascular Treatment |
title_full_unstemmed | Delayed Complications Due to Polymer Coating Embolism after Endovascular Treatment |
title_short | Delayed Complications Due to Polymer Coating Embolism after Endovascular Treatment |
title_sort | delayed complications due to polymer coating embolism after endovascular treatment |
topic | Case Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6957771/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31938675 http://dx.doi.org/10.2176/nmccrj.cr.2018-0319 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kitamuratakayuki delayedcomplicationsduetopolymercoatingembolismafterendovasculartreatment AT oishihidenori delayedcomplicationsduetopolymercoatingembolismafterendovasculartreatment AT fujiitakashi delayedcomplicationsduetopolymercoatingembolismafterendovasculartreatment AT teranishikohsuke delayedcomplicationsduetopolymercoatingembolismafterendovasculartreatment AT yatomikenji delayedcomplicationsduetopolymercoatingembolismafterendovasculartreatment AT yamamotomunetaka delayedcomplicationsduetopolymercoatingembolismafterendovasculartreatment AT araihajime delayedcomplicationsduetopolymercoatingembolismafterendovasculartreatment |