Cargando…

Effects of bodyweight support and guidance force on muscle activation during Locomat walking in people with stroke: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND: Locomat is a robotic exoskeleton providing guidance force and bodyweight support to facilitate intensive walking training for people with stroke. Although the Locomat has been reported to be effective in improving walking performance, the effects of training parameters on the neuromuscul...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lin, Jianhua, Hu, Guojiong, Ran, Jun, Chen, Linyu, Zhang, Xian, Zhang, Yanxin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6958616/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31931825
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-020-0641-6
_version_ 1783487451527905280
author Lin, Jianhua
Hu, Guojiong
Ran, Jun
Chen, Linyu
Zhang, Xian
Zhang, Yanxin
author_facet Lin, Jianhua
Hu, Guojiong
Ran, Jun
Chen, Linyu
Zhang, Xian
Zhang, Yanxin
author_sort Lin, Jianhua
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Locomat is a robotic exoskeleton providing guidance force and bodyweight support to facilitate intensive walking training for people with stroke. Although the Locomat has been reported to be effective in improving walking performance, the effects of training parameters on the neuromuscular control remain unclear. This study aimed to compare the muscle activities between Locomat walking and treadmill walking at a normal speed, as well as to investigate the effects of varying bodyweight support and guidance force on muscle activation patterns during Locomat walking in people with stroke. METHODS: A cross-sectional study design was employed. Participants first performed an unrestrained walking on a treadmill and then walked in the Locomat with different levels of bodyweight support (30% or 50%) and guidance force (40% or 70%) at the same speed (1.2 m/s). Surface electromyography (sEMG) of seven muscles of the affected leg was recorded. The sEMG envelope was time-normalised and averaged over gait cycles. Mean sEMG amplitude was then calculated by normalising the sEMG amplitude with respect to the peak amplitude during treadmill walking for statistical analysis. A series of Non-parametric test and post hoc analysis were performed with a significance level of 0.05. RESULTS: Fourteen participants with stroke were recruited at the Yangzhi Affiliated Rehabilitation Hospital of Tongji University (female n = 1; mean age 46.1 ± 11.1 years). Only the mean sEMG amplitude of vastus medialis oblique during Locomat walking (50% bodyweight support and 70% guidance force) was significantly lower than that during treadmill walking. Reducing both bodyweight and guidance increased muscle activity of gluteus medius and tibialis anterior. Activity of vastus medialis oblique muscle increased as bodyweight support reduced, while that of rectus femoris increased as guidance force decreased. CONCLUSIONS: The effects of Locomat on reducing muscle activity in people with stroke were minimized when walking at a normal speed. Reducing bodyweight support and guidance force increased the activity of specific muscles during Locomat walking. Effects of bodyweight support, guidance force and speed should be taken into account when developing individualized Locomat training protocols for clients with stroke.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6958616
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69586162020-01-17 Effects of bodyweight support and guidance force on muscle activation during Locomat walking in people with stroke: a cross-sectional study Lin, Jianhua Hu, Guojiong Ran, Jun Chen, Linyu Zhang, Xian Zhang, Yanxin J Neuroeng Rehabil Research BACKGROUND: Locomat is a robotic exoskeleton providing guidance force and bodyweight support to facilitate intensive walking training for people with stroke. Although the Locomat has been reported to be effective in improving walking performance, the effects of training parameters on the neuromuscular control remain unclear. This study aimed to compare the muscle activities between Locomat walking and treadmill walking at a normal speed, as well as to investigate the effects of varying bodyweight support and guidance force on muscle activation patterns during Locomat walking in people with stroke. METHODS: A cross-sectional study design was employed. Participants first performed an unrestrained walking on a treadmill and then walked in the Locomat with different levels of bodyweight support (30% or 50%) and guidance force (40% or 70%) at the same speed (1.2 m/s). Surface electromyography (sEMG) of seven muscles of the affected leg was recorded. The sEMG envelope was time-normalised and averaged over gait cycles. Mean sEMG amplitude was then calculated by normalising the sEMG amplitude with respect to the peak amplitude during treadmill walking for statistical analysis. A series of Non-parametric test and post hoc analysis were performed with a significance level of 0.05. RESULTS: Fourteen participants with stroke were recruited at the Yangzhi Affiliated Rehabilitation Hospital of Tongji University (female n = 1; mean age 46.1 ± 11.1 years). Only the mean sEMG amplitude of vastus medialis oblique during Locomat walking (50% bodyweight support and 70% guidance force) was significantly lower than that during treadmill walking. Reducing both bodyweight and guidance increased muscle activity of gluteus medius and tibialis anterior. Activity of vastus medialis oblique muscle increased as bodyweight support reduced, while that of rectus femoris increased as guidance force decreased. CONCLUSIONS: The effects of Locomat on reducing muscle activity in people with stroke were minimized when walking at a normal speed. Reducing bodyweight support and guidance force increased the activity of specific muscles during Locomat walking. Effects of bodyweight support, guidance force and speed should be taken into account when developing individualized Locomat training protocols for clients with stroke. BioMed Central 2020-01-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6958616/ /pubmed/31931825 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-020-0641-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Lin, Jianhua
Hu, Guojiong
Ran, Jun
Chen, Linyu
Zhang, Xian
Zhang, Yanxin
Effects of bodyweight support and guidance force on muscle activation during Locomat walking in people with stroke: a cross-sectional study
title Effects of bodyweight support and guidance force on muscle activation during Locomat walking in people with stroke: a cross-sectional study
title_full Effects of bodyweight support and guidance force on muscle activation during Locomat walking in people with stroke: a cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Effects of bodyweight support and guidance force on muscle activation during Locomat walking in people with stroke: a cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Effects of bodyweight support and guidance force on muscle activation during Locomat walking in people with stroke: a cross-sectional study
title_short Effects of bodyweight support and guidance force on muscle activation during Locomat walking in people with stroke: a cross-sectional study
title_sort effects of bodyweight support and guidance force on muscle activation during locomat walking in people with stroke: a cross-sectional study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6958616/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31931825
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-020-0641-6
work_keys_str_mv AT linjianhua effectsofbodyweightsupportandguidanceforceonmuscleactivationduringlocomatwalkinginpeoplewithstrokeacrosssectionalstudy
AT huguojiong effectsofbodyweightsupportandguidanceforceonmuscleactivationduringlocomatwalkinginpeoplewithstrokeacrosssectionalstudy
AT ranjun effectsofbodyweightsupportandguidanceforceonmuscleactivationduringlocomatwalkinginpeoplewithstrokeacrosssectionalstudy
AT chenlinyu effectsofbodyweightsupportandguidanceforceonmuscleactivationduringlocomatwalkinginpeoplewithstrokeacrosssectionalstudy
AT zhangxian effectsofbodyweightsupportandguidanceforceonmuscleactivationduringlocomatwalkinginpeoplewithstrokeacrosssectionalstudy
AT zhangyanxin effectsofbodyweightsupportandguidanceforceonmuscleactivationduringlocomatwalkinginpeoplewithstrokeacrosssectionalstudy