Cargando…
Implementation of Basic Life Support training in schools: a randomised controlled trial evaluating self-regulated learning as alternative training concept
BACKGROUND: The Kids save lives statement recommends annual Basic Life Support (BLS) training for school children but the implementation is challenging. Trainings should be easy to realise and every BLS training should be as effective as possible to prepare learners for lifesaving actions. Preparedn...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6958621/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31931770 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-8161-7 |
_version_ | 1783487452699164672 |
---|---|
author | Süss-Havemann, Christoph Kosan, Janina Seibold, Thomas Dibbern, Nils Martin Daubmann, Anne Kubitz, Jens Christian Beck, Stefanie |
author_facet | Süss-Havemann, Christoph Kosan, Janina Seibold, Thomas Dibbern, Nils Martin Daubmann, Anne Kubitz, Jens Christian Beck, Stefanie |
author_sort | Süss-Havemann, Christoph |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The Kids save lives statement recommends annual Basic Life Support (BLS) training for school children but the implementation is challenging. Trainings should be easy to realise and every BLS training should be as effective as possible to prepare learners for lifesaving actions. Preparedness implies skills and positive beliefs in the own capability (high self-efficacy). METHODS: This randomized controlled cluster study investigates, if self-regulated learning promotes self-efficacy and long-term retention of practical BLS skills. Students in the age of 12 years participated in a practical training in BLS and a scenario testing of skills. In the control group the practical training was instructor-led. In the intervention group the students self-regulated their learning processes and feedback was provided by the peer-group. The primary outcome self-efficacy for helping in cardiac arrest after the training and 9 months later was analysed using a multilevel mixed model. Means and pass-rates for BLS skills were secondary outcomes. RESULTS: Contrary to the assumptions, this study could not measure a higher self-efficacy for helping in cardiac arrest of the students participating in the intervention (n = 307 students) compared to the control group (n = 293 students) after training and at the follow-up (mean difference: 0.11 points, 95% CI: − 0.26 to 0.04, P = 0.135). The odds to pass all items of the BLS exam was not significantly different between the groups (OR 1.11, 95% CI: 0.81 to 1.52, p = 0.533). Self-regulated learning was associated with a higher performance of male students in the BLS exam (mean score: 7.35) compared to females of the intervention (female: 7.05) and compared to males of the control (7.06). CONCLUSION: This study could not resolve the question, if self-regulated learning in peer-groups improves self-efficacy for helping in cardiac arrest. Self-regulated learning is an effective alternative to instructor-led training in BLS skills training and may be feasible to realise for lay-persons. For male students self-regulated learning seems to be beneficial to support long-term retention of skills. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN17334920, retrospectively registered 07.03.2019. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6958621 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69586212020-01-17 Implementation of Basic Life Support training in schools: a randomised controlled trial evaluating self-regulated learning as alternative training concept Süss-Havemann, Christoph Kosan, Janina Seibold, Thomas Dibbern, Nils Martin Daubmann, Anne Kubitz, Jens Christian Beck, Stefanie BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: The Kids save lives statement recommends annual Basic Life Support (BLS) training for school children but the implementation is challenging. Trainings should be easy to realise and every BLS training should be as effective as possible to prepare learners for lifesaving actions. Preparedness implies skills and positive beliefs in the own capability (high self-efficacy). METHODS: This randomized controlled cluster study investigates, if self-regulated learning promotes self-efficacy and long-term retention of practical BLS skills. Students in the age of 12 years participated in a practical training in BLS and a scenario testing of skills. In the control group the practical training was instructor-led. In the intervention group the students self-regulated their learning processes and feedback was provided by the peer-group. The primary outcome self-efficacy for helping in cardiac arrest after the training and 9 months later was analysed using a multilevel mixed model. Means and pass-rates for BLS skills were secondary outcomes. RESULTS: Contrary to the assumptions, this study could not measure a higher self-efficacy for helping in cardiac arrest of the students participating in the intervention (n = 307 students) compared to the control group (n = 293 students) after training and at the follow-up (mean difference: 0.11 points, 95% CI: − 0.26 to 0.04, P = 0.135). The odds to pass all items of the BLS exam was not significantly different between the groups (OR 1.11, 95% CI: 0.81 to 1.52, p = 0.533). Self-regulated learning was associated with a higher performance of male students in the BLS exam (mean score: 7.35) compared to females of the intervention (female: 7.05) and compared to males of the control (7.06). CONCLUSION: This study could not resolve the question, if self-regulated learning in peer-groups improves self-efficacy for helping in cardiac arrest. Self-regulated learning is an effective alternative to instructor-led training in BLS skills training and may be feasible to realise for lay-persons. For male students self-regulated learning seems to be beneficial to support long-term retention of skills. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN17334920, retrospectively registered 07.03.2019. BioMed Central 2020-01-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6958621/ /pubmed/31931770 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-8161-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Süss-Havemann, Christoph Kosan, Janina Seibold, Thomas Dibbern, Nils Martin Daubmann, Anne Kubitz, Jens Christian Beck, Stefanie Implementation of Basic Life Support training in schools: a randomised controlled trial evaluating self-regulated learning as alternative training concept |
title | Implementation of Basic Life Support training in schools: a randomised controlled trial evaluating self-regulated learning as alternative training concept |
title_full | Implementation of Basic Life Support training in schools: a randomised controlled trial evaluating self-regulated learning as alternative training concept |
title_fullStr | Implementation of Basic Life Support training in schools: a randomised controlled trial evaluating self-regulated learning as alternative training concept |
title_full_unstemmed | Implementation of Basic Life Support training in schools: a randomised controlled trial evaluating self-regulated learning as alternative training concept |
title_short | Implementation of Basic Life Support training in schools: a randomised controlled trial evaluating self-regulated learning as alternative training concept |
title_sort | implementation of basic life support training in schools: a randomised controlled trial evaluating self-regulated learning as alternative training concept |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6958621/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31931770 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-8161-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT susshavemannchristoph implementationofbasiclifesupporttraininginschoolsarandomisedcontrolledtrialevaluatingselfregulatedlearningasalternativetrainingconcept AT kosanjanina implementationofbasiclifesupporttraininginschoolsarandomisedcontrolledtrialevaluatingselfregulatedlearningasalternativetrainingconcept AT seiboldthomas implementationofbasiclifesupporttraininginschoolsarandomisedcontrolledtrialevaluatingselfregulatedlearningasalternativetrainingconcept AT dibbernnilsmartin implementationofbasiclifesupporttraininginschoolsarandomisedcontrolledtrialevaluatingselfregulatedlearningasalternativetrainingconcept AT daubmannanne implementationofbasiclifesupporttraininginschoolsarandomisedcontrolledtrialevaluatingselfregulatedlearningasalternativetrainingconcept AT kubitzjenschristian implementationofbasiclifesupporttraininginschoolsarandomisedcontrolledtrialevaluatingselfregulatedlearningasalternativetrainingconcept AT beckstefanie implementationofbasiclifesupporttraininginschoolsarandomisedcontrolledtrialevaluatingselfregulatedlearningasalternativetrainingconcept |