Cargando…

A systematic review protocol on small/kiddie cigarette packaging size and its impact on smoking

BACKGROUND: Small/kiddie cigarette packs consist of less than 20 cigarette sticks. Kiddie packs were recently proposed to be reintroduced by the tobacco industry with an excuse to prevent consumers from buying illicit cigarettes. By reintroducing kiddie packs, cigarettes will inevitably be more affo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mat Rifin, Halizah, Rodzlan Hasani, Wan Shakira, Ling, Miaw Yn Jane, Robert Lourdes, Tania Gayle, Saminathan, Thamil Arasu, Ab Majid, Nur Liana, Ahmad, Ahzairin, Ismail, Hasimah, Mohd Yusoff, Muhammad Fadhli
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6958659/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31931868
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-019-1263-6
_version_ 1783487461830164480
author Mat Rifin, Halizah
Rodzlan Hasani, Wan Shakira
Ling, Miaw Yn Jane
Robert Lourdes, Tania Gayle
Saminathan, Thamil Arasu
Ab Majid, Nur Liana
Ahmad, Ahzairin
Ismail, Hasimah
Mohd Yusoff, Muhammad Fadhli
author_facet Mat Rifin, Halizah
Rodzlan Hasani, Wan Shakira
Ling, Miaw Yn Jane
Robert Lourdes, Tania Gayle
Saminathan, Thamil Arasu
Ab Majid, Nur Liana
Ahmad, Ahzairin
Ismail, Hasimah
Mohd Yusoff, Muhammad Fadhli
author_sort Mat Rifin, Halizah
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Small/kiddie cigarette packs consist of less than 20 cigarette sticks. Kiddie packs were recently proposed to be reintroduced by the tobacco industry with an excuse to prevent consumers from buying illicit cigarettes. By reintroducing kiddie packs, cigarettes will inevitably be more affordable and this would appeal to lower-income consumers especially teens. In this systematic review, we aimed to identify the impact of kiddie packs on smoking, specifically on smoking initiation, the urge/tendency to buy cigarettes and attempts to reduce cigarette consumption. METHODS: This systematic review will be based on the review of original articles on the impact of kiddie packs on smoking. There is no restriction on the publication dates. The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and Scopus will be searched to retrieve potential original articles. Additional records identified through other sources: Google Scholar, as well as Journal of Substance Use and Tobacco Control, are also to be searched. These will include original articles in any language which included all study designs (randomised controlled trials, quasi experimental and experimental studies, observational cross-sectional and cohort studies) comparing kiddie packs with regular cigarette packs. The primary outcomes of interest will be initiation of smoking and urge/tendency to buy cigarettes in the general population and attempts to reduce cigarette consumption among current smokers. Secondary outcomes will be the prevalence of smoking using kiddie packs among the current smokers. DISCUSSION: This systematic review will provide evidence to support the impact of kiddie packs on smoking in terms of smoking initiation, smoking prevalence, urge/tendency to purchase cigarettes and attempts to reduce cigarette consumption. The findings from this review could be helpful to policymakers in regulating kiddie packs to control the consumption of tobacco. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42018102325
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6958659
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69586592020-01-17 A systematic review protocol on small/kiddie cigarette packaging size and its impact on smoking Mat Rifin, Halizah Rodzlan Hasani, Wan Shakira Ling, Miaw Yn Jane Robert Lourdes, Tania Gayle Saminathan, Thamil Arasu Ab Majid, Nur Liana Ahmad, Ahzairin Ismail, Hasimah Mohd Yusoff, Muhammad Fadhli Syst Rev Protocol BACKGROUND: Small/kiddie cigarette packs consist of less than 20 cigarette sticks. Kiddie packs were recently proposed to be reintroduced by the tobacco industry with an excuse to prevent consumers from buying illicit cigarettes. By reintroducing kiddie packs, cigarettes will inevitably be more affordable and this would appeal to lower-income consumers especially teens. In this systematic review, we aimed to identify the impact of kiddie packs on smoking, specifically on smoking initiation, the urge/tendency to buy cigarettes and attempts to reduce cigarette consumption. METHODS: This systematic review will be based on the review of original articles on the impact of kiddie packs on smoking. There is no restriction on the publication dates. The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and Scopus will be searched to retrieve potential original articles. Additional records identified through other sources: Google Scholar, as well as Journal of Substance Use and Tobacco Control, are also to be searched. These will include original articles in any language which included all study designs (randomised controlled trials, quasi experimental and experimental studies, observational cross-sectional and cohort studies) comparing kiddie packs with regular cigarette packs. The primary outcomes of interest will be initiation of smoking and urge/tendency to buy cigarettes in the general population and attempts to reduce cigarette consumption among current smokers. Secondary outcomes will be the prevalence of smoking using kiddie packs among the current smokers. DISCUSSION: This systematic review will provide evidence to support the impact of kiddie packs on smoking in terms of smoking initiation, smoking prevalence, urge/tendency to purchase cigarettes and attempts to reduce cigarette consumption. The findings from this review could be helpful to policymakers in regulating kiddie packs to control the consumption of tobacco. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42018102325 BioMed Central 2020-01-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6958659/ /pubmed/31931868 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-019-1263-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Protocol
Mat Rifin, Halizah
Rodzlan Hasani, Wan Shakira
Ling, Miaw Yn Jane
Robert Lourdes, Tania Gayle
Saminathan, Thamil Arasu
Ab Majid, Nur Liana
Ahmad, Ahzairin
Ismail, Hasimah
Mohd Yusoff, Muhammad Fadhli
A systematic review protocol on small/kiddie cigarette packaging size and its impact on smoking
title A systematic review protocol on small/kiddie cigarette packaging size and its impact on smoking
title_full A systematic review protocol on small/kiddie cigarette packaging size and its impact on smoking
title_fullStr A systematic review protocol on small/kiddie cigarette packaging size and its impact on smoking
title_full_unstemmed A systematic review protocol on small/kiddie cigarette packaging size and its impact on smoking
title_short A systematic review protocol on small/kiddie cigarette packaging size and its impact on smoking
title_sort systematic review protocol on small/kiddie cigarette packaging size and its impact on smoking
topic Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6958659/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31931868
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-019-1263-6
work_keys_str_mv AT matrifinhalizah asystematicreviewprotocolonsmallkiddiecigarettepackagingsizeanditsimpactonsmoking
AT rodzlanhasaniwanshakira asystematicreviewprotocolonsmallkiddiecigarettepackagingsizeanditsimpactonsmoking
AT lingmiawynjane asystematicreviewprotocolonsmallkiddiecigarettepackagingsizeanditsimpactonsmoking
AT robertlourdestaniagayle asystematicreviewprotocolonsmallkiddiecigarettepackagingsizeanditsimpactonsmoking
AT saminathanthamilarasu asystematicreviewprotocolonsmallkiddiecigarettepackagingsizeanditsimpactonsmoking
AT abmajidnurliana asystematicreviewprotocolonsmallkiddiecigarettepackagingsizeanditsimpactonsmoking
AT ahmadahzairin asystematicreviewprotocolonsmallkiddiecigarettepackagingsizeanditsimpactonsmoking
AT ismailhasimah asystematicreviewprotocolonsmallkiddiecigarettepackagingsizeanditsimpactonsmoking
AT mohdyusoffmuhammadfadhli asystematicreviewprotocolonsmallkiddiecigarettepackagingsizeanditsimpactonsmoking
AT matrifinhalizah systematicreviewprotocolonsmallkiddiecigarettepackagingsizeanditsimpactonsmoking
AT rodzlanhasaniwanshakira systematicreviewprotocolonsmallkiddiecigarettepackagingsizeanditsimpactonsmoking
AT lingmiawynjane systematicreviewprotocolonsmallkiddiecigarettepackagingsizeanditsimpactonsmoking
AT robertlourdestaniagayle systematicreviewprotocolonsmallkiddiecigarettepackagingsizeanditsimpactonsmoking
AT saminathanthamilarasu systematicreviewprotocolonsmallkiddiecigarettepackagingsizeanditsimpactonsmoking
AT abmajidnurliana systematicreviewprotocolonsmallkiddiecigarettepackagingsizeanditsimpactonsmoking
AT ahmadahzairin systematicreviewprotocolonsmallkiddiecigarettepackagingsizeanditsimpactonsmoking
AT ismailhasimah systematicreviewprotocolonsmallkiddiecigarettepackagingsizeanditsimpactonsmoking
AT mohdyusoffmuhammadfadhli systematicreviewprotocolonsmallkiddiecigarettepackagingsizeanditsimpactonsmoking