Cargando…
A systematic review protocol on small/kiddie cigarette packaging size and its impact on smoking
BACKGROUND: Small/kiddie cigarette packs consist of less than 20 cigarette sticks. Kiddie packs were recently proposed to be reintroduced by the tobacco industry with an excuse to prevent consumers from buying illicit cigarettes. By reintroducing kiddie packs, cigarettes will inevitably be more affo...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6958659/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31931868 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-019-1263-6 |
_version_ | 1783487461830164480 |
---|---|
author | Mat Rifin, Halizah Rodzlan Hasani, Wan Shakira Ling, Miaw Yn Jane Robert Lourdes, Tania Gayle Saminathan, Thamil Arasu Ab Majid, Nur Liana Ahmad, Ahzairin Ismail, Hasimah Mohd Yusoff, Muhammad Fadhli |
author_facet | Mat Rifin, Halizah Rodzlan Hasani, Wan Shakira Ling, Miaw Yn Jane Robert Lourdes, Tania Gayle Saminathan, Thamil Arasu Ab Majid, Nur Liana Ahmad, Ahzairin Ismail, Hasimah Mohd Yusoff, Muhammad Fadhli |
author_sort | Mat Rifin, Halizah |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Small/kiddie cigarette packs consist of less than 20 cigarette sticks. Kiddie packs were recently proposed to be reintroduced by the tobacco industry with an excuse to prevent consumers from buying illicit cigarettes. By reintroducing kiddie packs, cigarettes will inevitably be more affordable and this would appeal to lower-income consumers especially teens. In this systematic review, we aimed to identify the impact of kiddie packs on smoking, specifically on smoking initiation, the urge/tendency to buy cigarettes and attempts to reduce cigarette consumption. METHODS: This systematic review will be based on the review of original articles on the impact of kiddie packs on smoking. There is no restriction on the publication dates. The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and Scopus will be searched to retrieve potential original articles. Additional records identified through other sources: Google Scholar, as well as Journal of Substance Use and Tobacco Control, are also to be searched. These will include original articles in any language which included all study designs (randomised controlled trials, quasi experimental and experimental studies, observational cross-sectional and cohort studies) comparing kiddie packs with regular cigarette packs. The primary outcomes of interest will be initiation of smoking and urge/tendency to buy cigarettes in the general population and attempts to reduce cigarette consumption among current smokers. Secondary outcomes will be the prevalence of smoking using kiddie packs among the current smokers. DISCUSSION: This systematic review will provide evidence to support the impact of kiddie packs on smoking in terms of smoking initiation, smoking prevalence, urge/tendency to purchase cigarettes and attempts to reduce cigarette consumption. The findings from this review could be helpful to policymakers in regulating kiddie packs to control the consumption of tobacco. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42018102325 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6958659 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69586592020-01-17 A systematic review protocol on small/kiddie cigarette packaging size and its impact on smoking Mat Rifin, Halizah Rodzlan Hasani, Wan Shakira Ling, Miaw Yn Jane Robert Lourdes, Tania Gayle Saminathan, Thamil Arasu Ab Majid, Nur Liana Ahmad, Ahzairin Ismail, Hasimah Mohd Yusoff, Muhammad Fadhli Syst Rev Protocol BACKGROUND: Small/kiddie cigarette packs consist of less than 20 cigarette sticks. Kiddie packs were recently proposed to be reintroduced by the tobacco industry with an excuse to prevent consumers from buying illicit cigarettes. By reintroducing kiddie packs, cigarettes will inevitably be more affordable and this would appeal to lower-income consumers especially teens. In this systematic review, we aimed to identify the impact of kiddie packs on smoking, specifically on smoking initiation, the urge/tendency to buy cigarettes and attempts to reduce cigarette consumption. METHODS: This systematic review will be based on the review of original articles on the impact of kiddie packs on smoking. There is no restriction on the publication dates. The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and Scopus will be searched to retrieve potential original articles. Additional records identified through other sources: Google Scholar, as well as Journal of Substance Use and Tobacco Control, are also to be searched. These will include original articles in any language which included all study designs (randomised controlled trials, quasi experimental and experimental studies, observational cross-sectional and cohort studies) comparing kiddie packs with regular cigarette packs. The primary outcomes of interest will be initiation of smoking and urge/tendency to buy cigarettes in the general population and attempts to reduce cigarette consumption among current smokers. Secondary outcomes will be the prevalence of smoking using kiddie packs among the current smokers. DISCUSSION: This systematic review will provide evidence to support the impact of kiddie packs on smoking in terms of smoking initiation, smoking prevalence, urge/tendency to purchase cigarettes and attempts to reduce cigarette consumption. The findings from this review could be helpful to policymakers in regulating kiddie packs to control the consumption of tobacco. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42018102325 BioMed Central 2020-01-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6958659/ /pubmed/31931868 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-019-1263-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Protocol Mat Rifin, Halizah Rodzlan Hasani, Wan Shakira Ling, Miaw Yn Jane Robert Lourdes, Tania Gayle Saminathan, Thamil Arasu Ab Majid, Nur Liana Ahmad, Ahzairin Ismail, Hasimah Mohd Yusoff, Muhammad Fadhli A systematic review protocol on small/kiddie cigarette packaging size and its impact on smoking |
title | A systematic review protocol on small/kiddie cigarette packaging size and its impact on smoking |
title_full | A systematic review protocol on small/kiddie cigarette packaging size and its impact on smoking |
title_fullStr | A systematic review protocol on small/kiddie cigarette packaging size and its impact on smoking |
title_full_unstemmed | A systematic review protocol on small/kiddie cigarette packaging size and its impact on smoking |
title_short | A systematic review protocol on small/kiddie cigarette packaging size and its impact on smoking |
title_sort | systematic review protocol on small/kiddie cigarette packaging size and its impact on smoking |
topic | Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6958659/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31931868 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-019-1263-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT matrifinhalizah asystematicreviewprotocolonsmallkiddiecigarettepackagingsizeanditsimpactonsmoking AT rodzlanhasaniwanshakira asystematicreviewprotocolonsmallkiddiecigarettepackagingsizeanditsimpactonsmoking AT lingmiawynjane asystematicreviewprotocolonsmallkiddiecigarettepackagingsizeanditsimpactonsmoking AT robertlourdestaniagayle asystematicreviewprotocolonsmallkiddiecigarettepackagingsizeanditsimpactonsmoking AT saminathanthamilarasu asystematicreviewprotocolonsmallkiddiecigarettepackagingsizeanditsimpactonsmoking AT abmajidnurliana asystematicreviewprotocolonsmallkiddiecigarettepackagingsizeanditsimpactonsmoking AT ahmadahzairin asystematicreviewprotocolonsmallkiddiecigarettepackagingsizeanditsimpactonsmoking AT ismailhasimah asystematicreviewprotocolonsmallkiddiecigarettepackagingsizeanditsimpactonsmoking AT mohdyusoffmuhammadfadhli asystematicreviewprotocolonsmallkiddiecigarettepackagingsizeanditsimpactonsmoking AT matrifinhalizah systematicreviewprotocolonsmallkiddiecigarettepackagingsizeanditsimpactonsmoking AT rodzlanhasaniwanshakira systematicreviewprotocolonsmallkiddiecigarettepackagingsizeanditsimpactonsmoking AT lingmiawynjane systematicreviewprotocolonsmallkiddiecigarettepackagingsizeanditsimpactonsmoking AT robertlourdestaniagayle systematicreviewprotocolonsmallkiddiecigarettepackagingsizeanditsimpactonsmoking AT saminathanthamilarasu systematicreviewprotocolonsmallkiddiecigarettepackagingsizeanditsimpactonsmoking AT abmajidnurliana systematicreviewprotocolonsmallkiddiecigarettepackagingsizeanditsimpactonsmoking AT ahmadahzairin systematicreviewprotocolonsmallkiddiecigarettepackagingsizeanditsimpactonsmoking AT ismailhasimah systematicreviewprotocolonsmallkiddiecigarettepackagingsizeanditsimpactonsmoking AT mohdyusoffmuhammadfadhli systematicreviewprotocolonsmallkiddiecigarettepackagingsizeanditsimpactonsmoking |