Cargando…

Socioeconomic and migration status as predictors of emergency caesarean section: a birth cohort study

BACKGROUND: Women with a migration background are reportedly at a higher risk of emergency caesarean section. There is evidence that this is due in part to suboptimal antenatal care use and quality of care. Despite the fact that migrant women and descendants of migrants are often at risk of socioeco...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Miani, C., Ludwig, A., Breckenkamp, J., Sauzet, O., Doyle, I-M, Hoeller-Holtrichter, C., Spallek, J., Razum, O.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6958756/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31931761
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-2725-5
_version_ 1783487482234404864
author Miani, C.
Ludwig, A.
Breckenkamp, J.
Sauzet, O.
Doyle, I-M
Hoeller-Holtrichter, C.
Spallek, J.
Razum, O.
author_facet Miani, C.
Ludwig, A.
Breckenkamp, J.
Sauzet, O.
Doyle, I-M
Hoeller-Holtrichter, C.
Spallek, J.
Razum, O.
author_sort Miani, C.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Women with a migration background are reportedly at a higher risk of emergency caesarean section. There is evidence that this is due in part to suboptimal antenatal care use and quality of care. Despite the fact that migrant women and descendants of migrants are often at risk of socioeconomic disadvantage, there is, in comparison, scarce and incomplete evidence on the role of socioeconomic position as an independent risk factor for emergency caesarean delivery. We therefore investigate whether and how migration background and two markers of socioeconomic position affect the risk of an emergency caesarean section and whether they interact with each other. METHODS: In 2013–2016, we recruited women during the perinatal period in Bielefeld, Germany, collecting data on health and socioeconomic and migration background, as well as routine perinatal data. We studied associations between migration background (1st generation migrant, 2nd/3rd generation woman, no migration background), socioeconomic status (educational attainment and net monthly household income), and the outcome emergency caesarean section. RESULTS: Of the 881 participants, 21% (n = 185) had an emergency caesarean section. Analyses showed no association between having an emergency caesarean section and migration status or education. Women in the lowest (< 800€/month) and second lowest (between 800 and 1750€/month) income categories were more likely (aOR: 1.96, CI: 1.01–3.81; and aOR: 2.36, CI: 1.27–4.40, respectively) to undergo an emergency caesarean section than women in the higher income groups. CONCLUSIONS: Migration status and education did not explain heterogeneity in mode of birth. Having a low household income, however, increased the chances of emergency caesarean section and thereby contributed towards producing health disadvantages. Awareness of these findings and measures to correct these inequalities could help to improve the quality of obstetric care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6958756
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69587562020-01-17 Socioeconomic and migration status as predictors of emergency caesarean section: a birth cohort study Miani, C. Ludwig, A. Breckenkamp, J. Sauzet, O. Doyle, I-M Hoeller-Holtrichter, C. Spallek, J. Razum, O. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: Women with a migration background are reportedly at a higher risk of emergency caesarean section. There is evidence that this is due in part to suboptimal antenatal care use and quality of care. Despite the fact that migrant women and descendants of migrants are often at risk of socioeconomic disadvantage, there is, in comparison, scarce and incomplete evidence on the role of socioeconomic position as an independent risk factor for emergency caesarean delivery. We therefore investigate whether and how migration background and two markers of socioeconomic position affect the risk of an emergency caesarean section and whether they interact with each other. METHODS: In 2013–2016, we recruited women during the perinatal period in Bielefeld, Germany, collecting data on health and socioeconomic and migration background, as well as routine perinatal data. We studied associations between migration background (1st generation migrant, 2nd/3rd generation woman, no migration background), socioeconomic status (educational attainment and net monthly household income), and the outcome emergency caesarean section. RESULTS: Of the 881 participants, 21% (n = 185) had an emergency caesarean section. Analyses showed no association between having an emergency caesarean section and migration status or education. Women in the lowest (< 800€/month) and second lowest (between 800 and 1750€/month) income categories were more likely (aOR: 1.96, CI: 1.01–3.81; and aOR: 2.36, CI: 1.27–4.40, respectively) to undergo an emergency caesarean section than women in the higher income groups. CONCLUSIONS: Migration status and education did not explain heterogeneity in mode of birth. Having a low household income, however, increased the chances of emergency caesarean section and thereby contributed towards producing health disadvantages. Awareness of these findings and measures to correct these inequalities could help to improve the quality of obstetric care. BioMed Central 2020-01-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6958756/ /pubmed/31931761 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-2725-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Miani, C.
Ludwig, A.
Breckenkamp, J.
Sauzet, O.
Doyle, I-M
Hoeller-Holtrichter, C.
Spallek, J.
Razum, O.
Socioeconomic and migration status as predictors of emergency caesarean section: a birth cohort study
title Socioeconomic and migration status as predictors of emergency caesarean section: a birth cohort study
title_full Socioeconomic and migration status as predictors of emergency caesarean section: a birth cohort study
title_fullStr Socioeconomic and migration status as predictors of emergency caesarean section: a birth cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Socioeconomic and migration status as predictors of emergency caesarean section: a birth cohort study
title_short Socioeconomic and migration status as predictors of emergency caesarean section: a birth cohort study
title_sort socioeconomic and migration status as predictors of emergency caesarean section: a birth cohort study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6958756/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31931761
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-2725-5
work_keys_str_mv AT mianic socioeconomicandmigrationstatusaspredictorsofemergencycaesareansectionabirthcohortstudy
AT ludwiga socioeconomicandmigrationstatusaspredictorsofemergencycaesareansectionabirthcohortstudy
AT breckenkampj socioeconomicandmigrationstatusaspredictorsofemergencycaesareansectionabirthcohortstudy
AT sauzeto socioeconomicandmigrationstatusaspredictorsofemergencycaesareansectionabirthcohortstudy
AT doyleim socioeconomicandmigrationstatusaspredictorsofemergencycaesareansectionabirthcohortstudy
AT hoellerholtrichterc socioeconomicandmigrationstatusaspredictorsofemergencycaesareansectionabirthcohortstudy
AT spallekj socioeconomicandmigrationstatusaspredictorsofemergencycaesareansectionabirthcohortstudy
AT razumo socioeconomicandmigrationstatusaspredictorsofemergencycaesareansectionabirthcohortstudy