Cargando…

Methylene Diphosphonate Bone Scan Scintigraphic Image Enhancement using Gamma Correction and Optimizing the Value of Gamma

INTRODUCTION: Focal areas of high radiotracer uptake in a bone-scan image can result in dynamic range of the intensity value to exceed the dynamic range of the display, requiring multiple interactive contrast adjustments. This unnecessary burden on time of physician can be avoided using power law eq...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sharma, Anshul, Pandey, Anil Kumar, Khichi, Deepak, Kumar, Rakesh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6958948/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31949365
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijnm.IJNM_128_19
_version_ 1783487503072755712
author Sharma, Anshul
Pandey, Anil Kumar
Khichi, Deepak
Kumar, Rakesh
author_facet Sharma, Anshul
Pandey, Anil Kumar
Khichi, Deepak
Kumar, Rakesh
author_sort Sharma, Anshul
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Focal areas of high radiotracer uptake in a bone-scan image can result in dynamic range of the intensity value to exceed the dynamic range of the display, requiring multiple interactive contrast adjustments. This unnecessary burden on time of physician can be avoided using power law equation to brighten up the low-intensity areas in image. However, despite the widespread availability of this technique in commercial systems, for this clinical setting, the gamma-value needs to be standardized. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty dark bone scan images were selected. Ten randomly selected images from this set were evaluated qualitatively and quantitatively (perception-based image quality evaluator, absolute mean brightness error, structural similarity, and peak signal to noise ratio) to select a range of gamma values (from 0.1 to 0.9, increment of 0.1), where the results were acceptable. This range of gamma was then applied to rest of the 50 images to find the best value. Images were evaluated by two experienced nuclear medicine physicians. Although not ideal, but for the purpose of simplicity, we tried reaching a single best value. For this, the physicians were asked to reach consensus on the acceptable images. RESULTS: In the first part of the study, after evaluation of 100 images (1 original and 9 processed images with 0.1–0.9 gammas), range of gamma values from 0.3 to 0.8 was found to be optimum. This range was then applied to rest of the 50 images. Evaluation of resultant 350 images (1 original and 6 processed for each input image) further narrowed this range to 0.4–0.7 (0.3 gamma selected only twice by one physician). The kappa for acceptable images was moderate at 0.482 (P <0.001). The single gamma value of 0.6 resulted in 72% of the images to be acceptable. CONCLUSION: Use of power law equation to brighten up the low intensity areas of dark bone scan images, without loss of clinically significant details, is feasible with single gamma value of 0.6 and range of 0.4–0.7 giving best results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6958948
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69589482020-01-16 Methylene Diphosphonate Bone Scan Scintigraphic Image Enhancement using Gamma Correction and Optimizing the Value of Gamma Sharma, Anshul Pandey, Anil Kumar Khichi, Deepak Kumar, Rakesh Indian J Nucl Med Original Article INTRODUCTION: Focal areas of high radiotracer uptake in a bone-scan image can result in dynamic range of the intensity value to exceed the dynamic range of the display, requiring multiple interactive contrast adjustments. This unnecessary burden on time of physician can be avoided using power law equation to brighten up the low-intensity areas in image. However, despite the widespread availability of this technique in commercial systems, for this clinical setting, the gamma-value needs to be standardized. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty dark bone scan images were selected. Ten randomly selected images from this set were evaluated qualitatively and quantitatively (perception-based image quality evaluator, absolute mean brightness error, structural similarity, and peak signal to noise ratio) to select a range of gamma values (from 0.1 to 0.9, increment of 0.1), where the results were acceptable. This range of gamma was then applied to rest of the 50 images to find the best value. Images were evaluated by two experienced nuclear medicine physicians. Although not ideal, but for the purpose of simplicity, we tried reaching a single best value. For this, the physicians were asked to reach consensus on the acceptable images. RESULTS: In the first part of the study, after evaluation of 100 images (1 original and 9 processed images with 0.1–0.9 gammas), range of gamma values from 0.3 to 0.8 was found to be optimum. This range was then applied to rest of the 50 images. Evaluation of resultant 350 images (1 original and 6 processed for each input image) further narrowed this range to 0.4–0.7 (0.3 gamma selected only twice by one physician). The kappa for acceptable images was moderate at 0.482 (P <0.001). The single gamma value of 0.6 resulted in 72% of the images to be acceptable. CONCLUSION: Use of power law equation to brighten up the low intensity areas of dark bone scan images, without loss of clinically significant details, is feasible with single gamma value of 0.6 and range of 0.4–0.7 giving best results. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020 2019-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC6958948/ /pubmed/31949365 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijnm.IJNM_128_19 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Indian Journal of Nuclear Medicine http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Sharma, Anshul
Pandey, Anil Kumar
Khichi, Deepak
Kumar, Rakesh
Methylene Diphosphonate Bone Scan Scintigraphic Image Enhancement using Gamma Correction and Optimizing the Value of Gamma
title Methylene Diphosphonate Bone Scan Scintigraphic Image Enhancement using Gamma Correction and Optimizing the Value of Gamma
title_full Methylene Diphosphonate Bone Scan Scintigraphic Image Enhancement using Gamma Correction and Optimizing the Value of Gamma
title_fullStr Methylene Diphosphonate Bone Scan Scintigraphic Image Enhancement using Gamma Correction and Optimizing the Value of Gamma
title_full_unstemmed Methylene Diphosphonate Bone Scan Scintigraphic Image Enhancement using Gamma Correction and Optimizing the Value of Gamma
title_short Methylene Diphosphonate Bone Scan Scintigraphic Image Enhancement using Gamma Correction and Optimizing the Value of Gamma
title_sort methylene diphosphonate bone scan scintigraphic image enhancement using gamma correction and optimizing the value of gamma
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6958948/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31949365
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijnm.IJNM_128_19
work_keys_str_mv AT sharmaanshul methylenediphosphonatebonescanscintigraphicimageenhancementusinggammacorrectionandoptimizingthevalueofgamma
AT pandeyanilkumar methylenediphosphonatebonescanscintigraphicimageenhancementusinggammacorrectionandoptimizingthevalueofgamma
AT khichideepak methylenediphosphonatebonescanscintigraphicimageenhancementusinggammacorrectionandoptimizingthevalueofgamma
AT kumarrakesh methylenediphosphonatebonescanscintigraphicimageenhancementusinggammacorrectionandoptimizingthevalueofgamma