Cargando…
Biomedical engineering and erectile restoration: design considerations for urologic prosthetics
For patients with moderate-to-severe erectile dysfunction, implantable penile prostheses continue to be a viable treatment. Medical device developers apply design controls during the development cycle to ensure that a product performs as intended in the final use environment. This process relies hea...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6958988/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31719264 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aja.aja_115_19 |
_version_ | 1783487512799346688 |
---|---|
author | Lund, Jonathan J |
author_facet | Lund, Jonathan J |
author_sort | Lund, Jonathan J |
collection | PubMed |
description | For patients with moderate-to-severe erectile dysfunction, implantable penile prostheses continue to be a viable treatment. Medical device developers apply design controls during the development cycle to ensure that a product performs as intended in the final use environment. This process relies heavily on the principles of systems engineering and documents every facet of performance, unmet need, and risk. To better understand design philosophy, it is important to frame benchmarked performance outcomes in the context of the ideal state. Careful consideration of erectile anatomy and physiology, including flaccid state, transitional phases, and full tumescence, informs penile prosthesis design philosophy and provides the foundation for product advancement. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6958988 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69589882020-01-16 Biomedical engineering and erectile restoration: design considerations for urologic prosthetics Lund, Jonathan J Asian J Androl Invited Review For patients with moderate-to-severe erectile dysfunction, implantable penile prostheses continue to be a viable treatment. Medical device developers apply design controls during the development cycle to ensure that a product performs as intended in the final use environment. This process relies heavily on the principles of systems engineering and documents every facet of performance, unmet need, and risk. To better understand design philosophy, it is important to frame benchmarked performance outcomes in the context of the ideal state. Careful consideration of erectile anatomy and physiology, including flaccid state, transitional phases, and full tumescence, informs penile prosthesis design philosophy and provides the foundation for product advancement. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019-11-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6958988/ /pubmed/31719264 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aja.aja_115_19 Text en Copyright: © The Author(s)(2019) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Invited Review Lund, Jonathan J Biomedical engineering and erectile restoration: design considerations for urologic prosthetics |
title | Biomedical engineering and erectile restoration: design considerations for urologic prosthetics |
title_full | Biomedical engineering and erectile restoration: design considerations for urologic prosthetics |
title_fullStr | Biomedical engineering and erectile restoration: design considerations for urologic prosthetics |
title_full_unstemmed | Biomedical engineering and erectile restoration: design considerations for urologic prosthetics |
title_short | Biomedical engineering and erectile restoration: design considerations for urologic prosthetics |
title_sort | biomedical engineering and erectile restoration: design considerations for urologic prosthetics |
topic | Invited Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6958988/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31719264 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aja.aja_115_19 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lundjonathanj biomedicalengineeringanderectilerestorationdesignconsiderationsforurologicprosthetics |