Cargando…

Biomedical engineering and erectile restoration: design considerations for urologic prosthetics

For patients with moderate-to-severe erectile dysfunction, implantable penile prostheses continue to be a viable treatment. Medical device developers apply design controls during the development cycle to ensure that a product performs as intended in the final use environment. This process relies hea...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Lund, Jonathan J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6958988/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31719264
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aja.aja_115_19
_version_ 1783487512799346688
author Lund, Jonathan J
author_facet Lund, Jonathan J
author_sort Lund, Jonathan J
collection PubMed
description For patients with moderate-to-severe erectile dysfunction, implantable penile prostheses continue to be a viable treatment. Medical device developers apply design controls during the development cycle to ensure that a product performs as intended in the final use environment. This process relies heavily on the principles of systems engineering and documents every facet of performance, unmet need, and risk. To better understand design philosophy, it is important to frame benchmarked performance outcomes in the context of the ideal state. Careful consideration of erectile anatomy and physiology, including flaccid state, transitional phases, and full tumescence, informs penile prosthesis design philosophy and provides the foundation for product advancement.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6958988
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69589882020-01-16 Biomedical engineering and erectile restoration: design considerations for urologic prosthetics Lund, Jonathan J Asian J Androl Invited Review For patients with moderate-to-severe erectile dysfunction, implantable penile prostheses continue to be a viable treatment. Medical device developers apply design controls during the development cycle to ensure that a product performs as intended in the final use environment. This process relies heavily on the principles of systems engineering and documents every facet of performance, unmet need, and risk. To better understand design philosophy, it is important to frame benchmarked performance outcomes in the context of the ideal state. Careful consideration of erectile anatomy and physiology, including flaccid state, transitional phases, and full tumescence, informs penile prosthesis design philosophy and provides the foundation for product advancement. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019-11-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6958988/ /pubmed/31719264 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aja.aja_115_19 Text en Copyright: © The Author(s)(2019) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Invited Review
Lund, Jonathan J
Biomedical engineering and erectile restoration: design considerations for urologic prosthetics
title Biomedical engineering and erectile restoration: design considerations for urologic prosthetics
title_full Biomedical engineering and erectile restoration: design considerations for urologic prosthetics
title_fullStr Biomedical engineering and erectile restoration: design considerations for urologic prosthetics
title_full_unstemmed Biomedical engineering and erectile restoration: design considerations for urologic prosthetics
title_short Biomedical engineering and erectile restoration: design considerations for urologic prosthetics
title_sort biomedical engineering and erectile restoration: design considerations for urologic prosthetics
topic Invited Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6958988/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31719264
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aja.aja_115_19
work_keys_str_mv AT lundjonathanj biomedicalengineeringanderectilerestorationdesignconsiderationsforurologicprosthetics