Cargando…

Predicting different adhesive regimens of circulating particles at blood capillary walls

A fundamental step in the rational design of vascular targeted particles is the firm adhesion at the blood vessel walls. Here, a combined lattice Boltzmann–immersed boundary model is presented for predicting the near-wall dynamics of circulating particles. A moving least squares algorithm is used to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Coclite, A., Mollica, H., Ranaldo, S., Pascazio, G., de Tullio, M. D., Decuzzi, P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6959371/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32009866
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10404-017-2003-7
_version_ 1783487582635556864
author Coclite, A.
Mollica, H.
Ranaldo, S.
Pascazio, G.
de Tullio, M. D.
Decuzzi, P.
author_facet Coclite, A.
Mollica, H.
Ranaldo, S.
Pascazio, G.
de Tullio, M. D.
Decuzzi, P.
author_sort Coclite, A.
collection PubMed
description A fundamental step in the rational design of vascular targeted particles is the firm adhesion at the blood vessel walls. Here, a combined lattice Boltzmann–immersed boundary model is presented for predicting the near-wall dynamics of circulating particles. A moving least squares algorithm is used to reconstruct the forcing term accounting for the immersed particle, whereas ligand-receptor binding at the particle–wall interface is described via forward and reverse probability distributions. First, it is demonstrated that the model predicts with good accuracy the rolling velocity of tumor cells over an endothelial layer in a microfluidic channel. Then, particle–wall interactions are systematically analyzed in terms of particle geometries (circular, elliptical with aspect ratios 2 and 3), surface ligand densities (0.3, 0.5, 0.7 and 0.9), ligand-receptor bond strengths (1 and 2) and Reynolds numbers (Re = 0.01, 0.1 and 1.0). Depending on these conditions, four different particle–wall interaction regimens are identified, namely not adhering, rolling, sliding and firmly adhering particles. The proposed computational strategy can be efficiently used for predicting the near-wall dynamics of particles with arbitrary geometries and surface properties and represents a fundamental tool in the rational design of particles for the specific delivery of therapeutic and imaging agents. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10404-017-2003-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6959371
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69593712020-01-29 Predicting different adhesive regimens of circulating particles at blood capillary walls Coclite, A. Mollica, H. Ranaldo, S. Pascazio, G. de Tullio, M. D. Decuzzi, P. Microfluid Nanofluidics Research Paper A fundamental step in the rational design of vascular targeted particles is the firm adhesion at the blood vessel walls. Here, a combined lattice Boltzmann–immersed boundary model is presented for predicting the near-wall dynamics of circulating particles. A moving least squares algorithm is used to reconstruct the forcing term accounting for the immersed particle, whereas ligand-receptor binding at the particle–wall interface is described via forward and reverse probability distributions. First, it is demonstrated that the model predicts with good accuracy the rolling velocity of tumor cells over an endothelial layer in a microfluidic channel. Then, particle–wall interactions are systematically analyzed in terms of particle geometries (circular, elliptical with aspect ratios 2 and 3), surface ligand densities (0.3, 0.5, 0.7 and 0.9), ligand-receptor bond strengths (1 and 2) and Reynolds numbers (Re = 0.01, 0.1 and 1.0). Depending on these conditions, four different particle–wall interaction regimens are identified, namely not adhering, rolling, sliding and firmly adhering particles. The proposed computational strategy can be efficiently used for predicting the near-wall dynamics of particles with arbitrary geometries and surface properties and represents a fundamental tool in the rational design of particles for the specific delivery of therapeutic and imaging agents. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10404-017-2003-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2017-10-26 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC6959371/ /pubmed/32009866 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10404-017-2003-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Coclite, A.
Mollica, H.
Ranaldo, S.
Pascazio, G.
de Tullio, M. D.
Decuzzi, P.
Predicting different adhesive regimens of circulating particles at blood capillary walls
title Predicting different adhesive regimens of circulating particles at blood capillary walls
title_full Predicting different adhesive regimens of circulating particles at blood capillary walls
title_fullStr Predicting different adhesive regimens of circulating particles at blood capillary walls
title_full_unstemmed Predicting different adhesive regimens of circulating particles at blood capillary walls
title_short Predicting different adhesive regimens of circulating particles at blood capillary walls
title_sort predicting different adhesive regimens of circulating particles at blood capillary walls
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6959371/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32009866
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10404-017-2003-7
work_keys_str_mv AT coclitea predictingdifferentadhesiveregimensofcirculatingparticlesatbloodcapillarywalls
AT mollicah predictingdifferentadhesiveregimensofcirculatingparticlesatbloodcapillarywalls
AT ranaldos predictingdifferentadhesiveregimensofcirculatingparticlesatbloodcapillarywalls
AT pascaziog predictingdifferentadhesiveregimensofcirculatingparticlesatbloodcapillarywalls
AT detulliomd predictingdifferentadhesiveregimensofcirculatingparticlesatbloodcapillarywalls
AT decuzzip predictingdifferentadhesiveregimensofcirculatingparticlesatbloodcapillarywalls