Cargando…

Comparison between abdominal ultrasound and nuclear magnetic resonance imaging detection of placenta accreta in the second and third trimester of pregnancy

This study is to determine accuracy of abdominal ultrasound and nuclear magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for placenta accreta in the second and third trimester of pregnancy and to define the most relevant features of abdominal ultrasound and MRI for placenta accreta prediction. Between September 201...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xia, Hui, Ke, Shu-Cheng, Qian, Rong-Rong, Lin, Ji-Guang, Li, Yang, Zhang, Xia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6959867/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31914010
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000017908
_version_ 1783487667540852736
author Xia, Hui
Ke, Shu-Cheng
Qian, Rong-Rong
Lin, Ji-Guang
Li, Yang
Zhang, Xia
author_facet Xia, Hui
Ke, Shu-Cheng
Qian, Rong-Rong
Lin, Ji-Guang
Li, Yang
Zhang, Xia
author_sort Xia, Hui
collection PubMed
description This study is to determine accuracy of abdominal ultrasound and nuclear magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for placenta accreta in the second and third trimester of pregnancy and to define the most relevant features of abdominal ultrasound and MRI for placenta accreta prediction. Between September 2012 and September 2018, 245 high risk of placenta accreta in the second trimester of pregnancy were prenatal diagnosed by abdominal ultrasound and MRI and they were followed up until the end of pregnancy. Forty-six patients at the second trimester of pregnancy and 40 patients at the third trimester of pregnancy were confirmed as placenta accreta. For the second and third trimester of pregnancy, the sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp), positive and negative predictive value (PPV and NPV) of abdominal ultrasound were 95.65% versus 97.50%, 91.78% versus 90.70%, 88% versus 83%, and 97% versus 99%, respectively, while the Se, Sp, PPV, and NPV of MRI were 89.13% versus 92.50%, 87.67% versus 8721%, 82% versus 77%, and 93% versus 96%, respectively. Five features having significant statistical differences between normal placentation women and placenta accreta patients in second or third trimester of pregnancy, including loss of the normal retroplacental clear space, thinning or disappearance of the myometrium, increased vascularization at the uterine serosa-bladder wall interface, and vascularization perpendicular to the uterine wall on abdominal ultrasound, and uterine bulging and dark intraplacental bands on MRI. Abdominal ultrasound and MRI for placenta accreta in the second and third trimester of pregnancy could provide meaningful imaging evidences.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6959867
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69598672020-01-31 Comparison between abdominal ultrasound and nuclear magnetic resonance imaging detection of placenta accreta in the second and third trimester of pregnancy Xia, Hui Ke, Shu-Cheng Qian, Rong-Rong Lin, Ji-Guang Li, Yang Zhang, Xia Medicine (Baltimore) 5600 This study is to determine accuracy of abdominal ultrasound and nuclear magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for placenta accreta in the second and third trimester of pregnancy and to define the most relevant features of abdominal ultrasound and MRI for placenta accreta prediction. Between September 2012 and September 2018, 245 high risk of placenta accreta in the second trimester of pregnancy were prenatal diagnosed by abdominal ultrasound and MRI and they were followed up until the end of pregnancy. Forty-six patients at the second trimester of pregnancy and 40 patients at the third trimester of pregnancy were confirmed as placenta accreta. For the second and third trimester of pregnancy, the sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp), positive and negative predictive value (PPV and NPV) of abdominal ultrasound were 95.65% versus 97.50%, 91.78% versus 90.70%, 88% versus 83%, and 97% versus 99%, respectively, while the Se, Sp, PPV, and NPV of MRI were 89.13% versus 92.50%, 87.67% versus 8721%, 82% versus 77%, and 93% versus 96%, respectively. Five features having significant statistical differences between normal placentation women and placenta accreta patients in second or third trimester of pregnancy, including loss of the normal retroplacental clear space, thinning or disappearance of the myometrium, increased vascularization at the uterine serosa-bladder wall interface, and vascularization perpendicular to the uterine wall on abdominal ultrasound, and uterine bulging and dark intraplacental bands on MRI. Abdominal ultrasound and MRI for placenta accreta in the second and third trimester of pregnancy could provide meaningful imaging evidences. Wolters Kluwer Health 2020-01-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6959867/ /pubmed/31914010 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000017908 Text en Copyright © 2020 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC), where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
spellingShingle 5600
Xia, Hui
Ke, Shu-Cheng
Qian, Rong-Rong
Lin, Ji-Guang
Li, Yang
Zhang, Xia
Comparison between abdominal ultrasound and nuclear magnetic resonance imaging detection of placenta accreta in the second and third trimester of pregnancy
title Comparison between abdominal ultrasound and nuclear magnetic resonance imaging detection of placenta accreta in the second and third trimester of pregnancy
title_full Comparison between abdominal ultrasound and nuclear magnetic resonance imaging detection of placenta accreta in the second and third trimester of pregnancy
title_fullStr Comparison between abdominal ultrasound and nuclear magnetic resonance imaging detection of placenta accreta in the second and third trimester of pregnancy
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between abdominal ultrasound and nuclear magnetic resonance imaging detection of placenta accreta in the second and third trimester of pregnancy
title_short Comparison between abdominal ultrasound and nuclear magnetic resonance imaging detection of placenta accreta in the second and third trimester of pregnancy
title_sort comparison between abdominal ultrasound and nuclear magnetic resonance imaging detection of placenta accreta in the second and third trimester of pregnancy
topic 5600
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6959867/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31914010
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000017908
work_keys_str_mv AT xiahui comparisonbetweenabdominalultrasoundandnuclearmagneticresonanceimagingdetectionofplacentaaccretainthesecondandthirdtrimesterofpregnancy
AT keshucheng comparisonbetweenabdominalultrasoundandnuclearmagneticresonanceimagingdetectionofplacentaaccretainthesecondandthirdtrimesterofpregnancy
AT qianrongrong comparisonbetweenabdominalultrasoundandnuclearmagneticresonanceimagingdetectionofplacentaaccretainthesecondandthirdtrimesterofpregnancy
AT linjiguang comparisonbetweenabdominalultrasoundandnuclearmagneticresonanceimagingdetectionofplacentaaccretainthesecondandthirdtrimesterofpregnancy
AT liyang comparisonbetweenabdominalultrasoundandnuclearmagneticresonanceimagingdetectionofplacentaaccretainthesecondandthirdtrimesterofpregnancy
AT zhangxia comparisonbetweenabdominalultrasoundandnuclearmagneticresonanceimagingdetectionofplacentaaccretainthesecondandthirdtrimesterofpregnancy