Cargando…

Carbapenems vs alternative antibiotics for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infection: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Complicated urinary tract infections (cUTI) are universal reasons for hospitalization, and highly likely to develop into sepsis or septic shock. Carbapenem antibiotics with potentially higher efficacy or with fewer and milder side effects have increased in popularity, but evidence is lim...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tan, Xinmei, Pan, Qiwen, Mo, Changgan, Li, Xianshu, Liang, Xueyan, Li, Yan, Lan, Yingnian, Chen, Lingyuan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6959894/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31914101
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000018769
_version_ 1783487673716965376
author Tan, Xinmei
Pan, Qiwen
Mo, Changgan
Li, Xianshu
Liang, Xueyan
Li, Yan
Lan, Yingnian
Chen, Lingyuan
author_facet Tan, Xinmei
Pan, Qiwen
Mo, Changgan
Li, Xianshu
Liang, Xueyan
Li, Yan
Lan, Yingnian
Chen, Lingyuan
author_sort Tan, Xinmei
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Complicated urinary tract infections (cUTI) are universal reasons for hospitalization, and highly likely to develop into sepsis or septic shock. Carbapenem antibiotics with potentially higher efficacy or with fewer and milder side effects have increased in popularity, but evidence is limited by a scarcity of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing different carbapenem antibiotics for cUTI. Network meta-analysis is a useful tool to compare multiple treatments when there is limited or no direct evidence available. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of different carbapenems with alternative antibiotics for the treatment of cUTI. METHODS: Pubmed, Medline, CENTRAL, and Embase were searched in November 2018. Studies of cUTI patients receiving carbapenem were included. We performed network meta-analysis to estimate the risk ratio (RR) and 95% credible interval (CrI) from both direct and indirect evidence; traditional meta-analysis was also performed. Primary outcomes were clinical and microbiological treatment success. RESULTS: A total of 19 studies and 7380 patients were included in the analysis. Doripenem (DOPM) was associated with lower clinical treatment success rates than other carbapenems. Although the efficacy of other carbapenems by RRs with 95% CrIs did not show statistical differences, the cumulative rank probability indicated that meropenem/vaborbactam (MV), ertapenem (ETPM), and biapenem (BAPM) had higher clinical and microbiological treatment success rates; imipenem/cilastatin (IC) and MV showed higher risk of adverse events (AEs). CONCLUSIONS: MV was associated with higher treatment success rates for cUTI, especially for cUTI caused by carbapenem-resistant uropathogens, but also with higher risk of AEs. Our findings suggest MV as a first-choice treatment of carbapenem-resistant cUTI. ETPM, BAPM, and meropenem (MEPM) is another reasonable choice for cUTI empiric therapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6959894
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69598942020-01-31 Carbapenems vs alternative antibiotics for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infection: A systematic review and network meta-analysis Tan, Xinmei Pan, Qiwen Mo, Changgan Li, Xianshu Liang, Xueyan Li, Yan Lan, Yingnian Chen, Lingyuan Medicine (Baltimore) 4900 BACKGROUND: Complicated urinary tract infections (cUTI) are universal reasons for hospitalization, and highly likely to develop into sepsis or septic shock. Carbapenem antibiotics with potentially higher efficacy or with fewer and milder side effects have increased in popularity, but evidence is limited by a scarcity of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing different carbapenem antibiotics for cUTI. Network meta-analysis is a useful tool to compare multiple treatments when there is limited or no direct evidence available. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of different carbapenems with alternative antibiotics for the treatment of cUTI. METHODS: Pubmed, Medline, CENTRAL, and Embase were searched in November 2018. Studies of cUTI patients receiving carbapenem were included. We performed network meta-analysis to estimate the risk ratio (RR) and 95% credible interval (CrI) from both direct and indirect evidence; traditional meta-analysis was also performed. Primary outcomes were clinical and microbiological treatment success. RESULTS: A total of 19 studies and 7380 patients were included in the analysis. Doripenem (DOPM) was associated with lower clinical treatment success rates than other carbapenems. Although the efficacy of other carbapenems by RRs with 95% CrIs did not show statistical differences, the cumulative rank probability indicated that meropenem/vaborbactam (MV), ertapenem (ETPM), and biapenem (BAPM) had higher clinical and microbiological treatment success rates; imipenem/cilastatin (IC) and MV showed higher risk of adverse events (AEs). CONCLUSIONS: MV was associated with higher treatment success rates for cUTI, especially for cUTI caused by carbapenem-resistant uropathogens, but also with higher risk of AEs. Our findings suggest MV as a first-choice treatment of carbapenem-resistant cUTI. ETPM, BAPM, and meropenem (MEPM) is another reasonable choice for cUTI empiric therapy. Wolters Kluwer Health 2020-01-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6959894/ /pubmed/31914101 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000018769 Text en Copyright © 2020 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC), where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
spellingShingle 4900
Tan, Xinmei
Pan, Qiwen
Mo, Changgan
Li, Xianshu
Liang, Xueyan
Li, Yan
Lan, Yingnian
Chen, Lingyuan
Carbapenems vs alternative antibiotics for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infection: A systematic review and network meta-analysis
title Carbapenems vs alternative antibiotics for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infection: A systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_full Carbapenems vs alternative antibiotics for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infection: A systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_fullStr Carbapenems vs alternative antibiotics for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infection: A systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Carbapenems vs alternative antibiotics for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infection: A systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_short Carbapenems vs alternative antibiotics for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infection: A systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_sort carbapenems vs alternative antibiotics for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infection: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
topic 4900
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6959894/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31914101
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000018769
work_keys_str_mv AT tanxinmei carbapenemsvsalternativeantibioticsforthetreatmentofcomplicatedurinarytractinfectionasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT panqiwen carbapenemsvsalternativeantibioticsforthetreatmentofcomplicatedurinarytractinfectionasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT mochanggan carbapenemsvsalternativeantibioticsforthetreatmentofcomplicatedurinarytractinfectionasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT lixianshu carbapenemsvsalternativeantibioticsforthetreatmentofcomplicatedurinarytractinfectionasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT liangxueyan carbapenemsvsalternativeantibioticsforthetreatmentofcomplicatedurinarytractinfectionasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT liyan carbapenemsvsalternativeantibioticsforthetreatmentofcomplicatedurinarytractinfectionasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT lanyingnian carbapenemsvsalternativeantibioticsforthetreatmentofcomplicatedurinarytractinfectionasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT chenlingyuan carbapenemsvsalternativeantibioticsforthetreatmentofcomplicatedurinarytractinfectionasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis