Cargando…
Carbapenems vs alternative antibiotics for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infection: A systematic review and network meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: Complicated urinary tract infections (cUTI) are universal reasons for hospitalization, and highly likely to develop into sepsis or septic shock. Carbapenem antibiotics with potentially higher efficacy or with fewer and milder side effects have increased in popularity, but evidence is lim...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6959894/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31914101 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000018769 |
_version_ | 1783487673716965376 |
---|---|
author | Tan, Xinmei Pan, Qiwen Mo, Changgan Li, Xianshu Liang, Xueyan Li, Yan Lan, Yingnian Chen, Lingyuan |
author_facet | Tan, Xinmei Pan, Qiwen Mo, Changgan Li, Xianshu Liang, Xueyan Li, Yan Lan, Yingnian Chen, Lingyuan |
author_sort | Tan, Xinmei |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Complicated urinary tract infections (cUTI) are universal reasons for hospitalization, and highly likely to develop into sepsis or septic shock. Carbapenem antibiotics with potentially higher efficacy or with fewer and milder side effects have increased in popularity, but evidence is limited by a scarcity of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing different carbapenem antibiotics for cUTI. Network meta-analysis is a useful tool to compare multiple treatments when there is limited or no direct evidence available. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of different carbapenems with alternative antibiotics for the treatment of cUTI. METHODS: Pubmed, Medline, CENTRAL, and Embase were searched in November 2018. Studies of cUTI patients receiving carbapenem were included. We performed network meta-analysis to estimate the risk ratio (RR) and 95% credible interval (CrI) from both direct and indirect evidence; traditional meta-analysis was also performed. Primary outcomes were clinical and microbiological treatment success. RESULTS: A total of 19 studies and 7380 patients were included in the analysis. Doripenem (DOPM) was associated with lower clinical treatment success rates than other carbapenems. Although the efficacy of other carbapenems by RRs with 95% CrIs did not show statistical differences, the cumulative rank probability indicated that meropenem/vaborbactam (MV), ertapenem (ETPM), and biapenem (BAPM) had higher clinical and microbiological treatment success rates; imipenem/cilastatin (IC) and MV showed higher risk of adverse events (AEs). CONCLUSIONS: MV was associated with higher treatment success rates for cUTI, especially for cUTI caused by carbapenem-resistant uropathogens, but also with higher risk of AEs. Our findings suggest MV as a first-choice treatment of carbapenem-resistant cUTI. ETPM, BAPM, and meropenem (MEPM) is another reasonable choice for cUTI empiric therapy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6959894 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69598942020-01-31 Carbapenems vs alternative antibiotics for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infection: A systematic review and network meta-analysis Tan, Xinmei Pan, Qiwen Mo, Changgan Li, Xianshu Liang, Xueyan Li, Yan Lan, Yingnian Chen, Lingyuan Medicine (Baltimore) 4900 BACKGROUND: Complicated urinary tract infections (cUTI) are universal reasons for hospitalization, and highly likely to develop into sepsis or septic shock. Carbapenem antibiotics with potentially higher efficacy or with fewer and milder side effects have increased in popularity, but evidence is limited by a scarcity of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing different carbapenem antibiotics for cUTI. Network meta-analysis is a useful tool to compare multiple treatments when there is limited or no direct evidence available. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of different carbapenems with alternative antibiotics for the treatment of cUTI. METHODS: Pubmed, Medline, CENTRAL, and Embase were searched in November 2018. Studies of cUTI patients receiving carbapenem were included. We performed network meta-analysis to estimate the risk ratio (RR) and 95% credible interval (CrI) from both direct and indirect evidence; traditional meta-analysis was also performed. Primary outcomes were clinical and microbiological treatment success. RESULTS: A total of 19 studies and 7380 patients were included in the analysis. Doripenem (DOPM) was associated with lower clinical treatment success rates than other carbapenems. Although the efficacy of other carbapenems by RRs with 95% CrIs did not show statistical differences, the cumulative rank probability indicated that meropenem/vaborbactam (MV), ertapenem (ETPM), and biapenem (BAPM) had higher clinical and microbiological treatment success rates; imipenem/cilastatin (IC) and MV showed higher risk of adverse events (AEs). CONCLUSIONS: MV was associated with higher treatment success rates for cUTI, especially for cUTI caused by carbapenem-resistant uropathogens, but also with higher risk of AEs. Our findings suggest MV as a first-choice treatment of carbapenem-resistant cUTI. ETPM, BAPM, and meropenem (MEPM) is another reasonable choice for cUTI empiric therapy. Wolters Kluwer Health 2020-01-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6959894/ /pubmed/31914101 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000018769 Text en Copyright © 2020 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC), where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
spellingShingle | 4900 Tan, Xinmei Pan, Qiwen Mo, Changgan Li, Xianshu Liang, Xueyan Li, Yan Lan, Yingnian Chen, Lingyuan Carbapenems vs alternative antibiotics for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infection: A systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title | Carbapenems vs alternative antibiotics for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infection: A systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title_full | Carbapenems vs alternative antibiotics for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infection: A systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Carbapenems vs alternative antibiotics for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infection: A systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Carbapenems vs alternative antibiotics for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infection: A systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title_short | Carbapenems vs alternative antibiotics for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infection: A systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title_sort | carbapenems vs alternative antibiotics for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infection: a systematic review and network meta-analysis |
topic | 4900 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6959894/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31914101 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000018769 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tanxinmei carbapenemsvsalternativeantibioticsforthetreatmentofcomplicatedurinarytractinfectionasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT panqiwen carbapenemsvsalternativeantibioticsforthetreatmentofcomplicatedurinarytractinfectionasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT mochanggan carbapenemsvsalternativeantibioticsforthetreatmentofcomplicatedurinarytractinfectionasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT lixianshu carbapenemsvsalternativeantibioticsforthetreatmentofcomplicatedurinarytractinfectionasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT liangxueyan carbapenemsvsalternativeantibioticsforthetreatmentofcomplicatedurinarytractinfectionasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT liyan carbapenemsvsalternativeantibioticsforthetreatmentofcomplicatedurinarytractinfectionasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT lanyingnian carbapenemsvsalternativeantibioticsforthetreatmentofcomplicatedurinarytractinfectionasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT chenlingyuan carbapenemsvsalternativeantibioticsforthetreatmentofcomplicatedurinarytractinfectionasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis |