Cargando…
Projected Cartilage Area Ratio Determined by 3-Dimensional MRI Analysis: Validation of a Novel Technique to Evaluate Articular Cartilage
We have developed 3-dimensional (3D) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) analysis software that allows measurement of the projected cartilage area ratio with a particular thickness intended to allow quantitation of the cartilage in the knee. Our aims in this study were to validate the projected cartila...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6959912/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32043053 http://dx.doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.OA.19.00010 |
_version_ | 1783487677931192320 |
---|---|
author | Hyodo, Akinobu Ozeki, Nobutake Kohno, Yuji Suzuki, So Mizuno, Mitsuru Otabe, Koji Katano, Hisako Tomita, Makoto Nakagawa, Yusuke Koga, Hideyuki Kiuchi, Shinji Suzuki, Kenji Itai, Yoshinori Masumoto, Jun Sekiya, Ichiro |
author_facet | Hyodo, Akinobu Ozeki, Nobutake Kohno, Yuji Suzuki, So Mizuno, Mitsuru Otabe, Koji Katano, Hisako Tomita, Makoto Nakagawa, Yusuke Koga, Hideyuki Kiuchi, Shinji Suzuki, Kenji Itai, Yoshinori Masumoto, Jun Sekiya, Ichiro |
author_sort | Hyodo, Akinobu |
collection | PubMed |
description | We have developed 3-dimensional (3D) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) analysis software that allows measurement of the projected cartilage area ratio with a particular thickness intended to allow quantitation of the cartilage in the knee. Our aims in this study were to validate the projected cartilage area ratio in both pig and human knees and to examine the ratio in patients reporting knee pain. METHODS: After 3D MRI reconstruction, the femoral cartilage was projected onto a flat surface. The projected cartilage area was determined in pig knees using our 3D MRI analysis software, and was compared with the area obtained with other software. The projected cartilage area ratio (for cartilage thickness ≥1.5 mm) at 4 segments was also validated in human knees. Finally, changes in the projected cartilage area ratio were examined in 8 patients with knee pain who had undergone 2 MR images at 3 to 21-month intervals. RESULTS: The projected cartilage areas determined with our 3D MRI analysis software were validated in pig knees. The projected cartilage area ratio at each segment in human knees had an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.87 to 0.99 (n = 16) between readers and 0.76 to 0.99 (n = 20) between measurements on repeat MR images. The projected cartilage area ratio (for cartilage thickness ≥1.5 mm) at the most affected segment in 8 human patients significantly decreased between the pairs of MR images obtained at intervals of 3 to 21 months. CONCLUSIONS: We proposed a novel evaluation method using 3D MRI to quantify the amount of cartilage in the knee. This method had a low measurement error in both pig and human knees. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The projected cartilage area ratio based on a particular thickness may serve as a sensitive method for assessing changes in cartilage over time. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6959912 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69599122020-02-10 Projected Cartilage Area Ratio Determined by 3-Dimensional MRI Analysis: Validation of a Novel Technique to Evaluate Articular Cartilage Hyodo, Akinobu Ozeki, Nobutake Kohno, Yuji Suzuki, So Mizuno, Mitsuru Otabe, Koji Katano, Hisako Tomita, Makoto Nakagawa, Yusuke Koga, Hideyuki Kiuchi, Shinji Suzuki, Kenji Itai, Yoshinori Masumoto, Jun Sekiya, Ichiro JB JS Open Access Scientific Articles We have developed 3-dimensional (3D) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) analysis software that allows measurement of the projected cartilage area ratio with a particular thickness intended to allow quantitation of the cartilage in the knee. Our aims in this study were to validate the projected cartilage area ratio in both pig and human knees and to examine the ratio in patients reporting knee pain. METHODS: After 3D MRI reconstruction, the femoral cartilage was projected onto a flat surface. The projected cartilage area was determined in pig knees using our 3D MRI analysis software, and was compared with the area obtained with other software. The projected cartilage area ratio (for cartilage thickness ≥1.5 mm) at 4 segments was also validated in human knees. Finally, changes in the projected cartilage area ratio were examined in 8 patients with knee pain who had undergone 2 MR images at 3 to 21-month intervals. RESULTS: The projected cartilage areas determined with our 3D MRI analysis software were validated in pig knees. The projected cartilage area ratio at each segment in human knees had an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.87 to 0.99 (n = 16) between readers and 0.76 to 0.99 (n = 20) between measurements on repeat MR images. The projected cartilage area ratio (for cartilage thickness ≥1.5 mm) at the most affected segment in 8 human patients significantly decreased between the pairs of MR images obtained at intervals of 3 to 21 months. CONCLUSIONS: We proposed a novel evaluation method using 3D MRI to quantify the amount of cartilage in the knee. This method had a low measurement error in both pig and human knees. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The projected cartilage area ratio based on a particular thickness may serve as a sensitive method for assessing changes in cartilage over time. Wolters Kluwer 2019-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6959912/ /pubmed/32043053 http://dx.doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.OA.19.00010 Text en Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated. All rights reserved. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | Scientific Articles Hyodo, Akinobu Ozeki, Nobutake Kohno, Yuji Suzuki, So Mizuno, Mitsuru Otabe, Koji Katano, Hisako Tomita, Makoto Nakagawa, Yusuke Koga, Hideyuki Kiuchi, Shinji Suzuki, Kenji Itai, Yoshinori Masumoto, Jun Sekiya, Ichiro Projected Cartilage Area Ratio Determined by 3-Dimensional MRI Analysis: Validation of a Novel Technique to Evaluate Articular Cartilage |
title | Projected Cartilage Area Ratio Determined by 3-Dimensional MRI Analysis: Validation of a Novel Technique to Evaluate Articular Cartilage |
title_full | Projected Cartilage Area Ratio Determined by 3-Dimensional MRI Analysis: Validation of a Novel Technique to Evaluate Articular Cartilage |
title_fullStr | Projected Cartilage Area Ratio Determined by 3-Dimensional MRI Analysis: Validation of a Novel Technique to Evaluate Articular Cartilage |
title_full_unstemmed | Projected Cartilage Area Ratio Determined by 3-Dimensional MRI Analysis: Validation of a Novel Technique to Evaluate Articular Cartilage |
title_short | Projected Cartilage Area Ratio Determined by 3-Dimensional MRI Analysis: Validation of a Novel Technique to Evaluate Articular Cartilage |
title_sort | projected cartilage area ratio determined by 3-dimensional mri analysis: validation of a novel technique to evaluate articular cartilage |
topic | Scientific Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6959912/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32043053 http://dx.doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.OA.19.00010 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hyodoakinobu projectedcartilagearearatiodeterminedby3dimensionalmrianalysisvalidationofanoveltechniquetoevaluatearticularcartilage AT ozekinobutake projectedcartilagearearatiodeterminedby3dimensionalmrianalysisvalidationofanoveltechniquetoevaluatearticularcartilage AT kohnoyuji projectedcartilagearearatiodeterminedby3dimensionalmrianalysisvalidationofanoveltechniquetoevaluatearticularcartilage AT suzukiso projectedcartilagearearatiodeterminedby3dimensionalmrianalysisvalidationofanoveltechniquetoevaluatearticularcartilage AT mizunomitsuru projectedcartilagearearatiodeterminedby3dimensionalmrianalysisvalidationofanoveltechniquetoevaluatearticularcartilage AT otabekoji projectedcartilagearearatiodeterminedby3dimensionalmrianalysisvalidationofanoveltechniquetoevaluatearticularcartilage AT katanohisako projectedcartilagearearatiodeterminedby3dimensionalmrianalysisvalidationofanoveltechniquetoevaluatearticularcartilage AT tomitamakoto projectedcartilagearearatiodeterminedby3dimensionalmrianalysisvalidationofanoveltechniquetoevaluatearticularcartilage AT nakagawayusuke projectedcartilagearearatiodeterminedby3dimensionalmrianalysisvalidationofanoveltechniquetoevaluatearticularcartilage AT kogahideyuki projectedcartilagearearatiodeterminedby3dimensionalmrianalysisvalidationofanoveltechniquetoevaluatearticularcartilage AT kiuchishinji projectedcartilagearearatiodeterminedby3dimensionalmrianalysisvalidationofanoveltechniquetoevaluatearticularcartilage AT suzukikenji projectedcartilagearearatiodeterminedby3dimensionalmrianalysisvalidationofanoveltechniquetoevaluatearticularcartilage AT itaiyoshinori projectedcartilagearearatiodeterminedby3dimensionalmrianalysisvalidationofanoveltechniquetoevaluatearticularcartilage AT masumotojun projectedcartilagearearatiodeterminedby3dimensionalmrianalysisvalidationofanoveltechniquetoevaluatearticularcartilage AT sekiyaichiro projectedcartilagearearatiodeterminedby3dimensionalmrianalysisvalidationofanoveltechniquetoevaluatearticularcartilage |