Cargando…
Modified long-axis in-plane ultrasound technique versus conventional palpation technique for radial arterial cannulation: A prospective randomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND: A low first-pass success rate of radial artery cannulation was obtained when using the conventional palpation technique (C-PT) or conventional ultrasound-guided techniques, we; therefore, evaluate the effect of a modified long-axis in-plane ultrasound technique (M-LAINUT) in guiding radi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6959944/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31914094 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000018747 |
_version_ | 1783487685527076864 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Jiebo Lai, Zhongmeng Weng, Xianfeng Lin, Yong Wu, Guohua Su, Jiansheng Huang, Qijian Zeng, Jian Liu, Junle Zhao, Zisong Yan, Ting Zhang, Liangcheng Zhou, Linying |
author_facet | Wang, Jiebo Lai, Zhongmeng Weng, Xianfeng Lin, Yong Wu, Guohua Su, Jiansheng Huang, Qijian Zeng, Jian Liu, Junle Zhao, Zisong Yan, Ting Zhang, Liangcheng Zhou, Linying |
author_sort | Wang, Jiebo |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: A low first-pass success rate of radial artery cannulation was obtained when using the conventional palpation technique (C-PT) or conventional ultrasound-guided techniques, we; therefore, evaluate the effect of a modified long-axis in-plane ultrasound technique (M-LAINUT) in guiding radial artery cannulation in adults. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, randomized and controlled clinical trial of 288 patients undergoing radial artery cannulation. Patients were randomized 1:1 to M-LAINUT or C-PT group at Fujian Medical University Union Hospital between 2017 and 2018. Radial artery cannulation was performed by 3 anesthesiologists with different experience. The outcome was the first and total radial artery cannulation success rates, the number of attempts and the cannulation time, and incidence of complications. RESULTS: Two hundred eighty-five patients were statistically analyzed. The success rate of first attempt was 91.6% in the M-LAINUT group (n = 143) and 57.7% in the C-PT group (n = 142; P < .001) (odds ratio, 7.9; 95% confidence interval, 4.0–15.7). The total success rate (≤5 minutes and ≤3 attempts) in the M-LAINUT group was 97.9%, compared to 84.5% in the palpation group (P < .001) (odds ratio, 8.5; 95% confidence interval, 2.5–29.2). The total cannulation time was shorter and the number of attempts was fewer in the M-LAINUT group than that in the C-PT group (P < .05). The incidence of hematoma in the C-PT group was 19.7%, which was significantly higher than the 2.8% in the M-LAINUT group (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Modified long-axis in-plane ultrasound-guided radial artery cannulation can increase the first and total radial artery cannulation success rates, reduce the number of attempts, and shorten the total cannulation time in adults. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6959944 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69599442020-01-31 Modified long-axis in-plane ultrasound technique versus conventional palpation technique for radial arterial cannulation: A prospective randomized controlled trial Wang, Jiebo Lai, Zhongmeng Weng, Xianfeng Lin, Yong Wu, Guohua Su, Jiansheng Huang, Qijian Zeng, Jian Liu, Junle Zhao, Zisong Yan, Ting Zhang, Liangcheng Zhou, Linying Medicine (Baltimore) 3300 BACKGROUND: A low first-pass success rate of radial artery cannulation was obtained when using the conventional palpation technique (C-PT) or conventional ultrasound-guided techniques, we; therefore, evaluate the effect of a modified long-axis in-plane ultrasound technique (M-LAINUT) in guiding radial artery cannulation in adults. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, randomized and controlled clinical trial of 288 patients undergoing radial artery cannulation. Patients were randomized 1:1 to M-LAINUT or C-PT group at Fujian Medical University Union Hospital between 2017 and 2018. Radial artery cannulation was performed by 3 anesthesiologists with different experience. The outcome was the first and total radial artery cannulation success rates, the number of attempts and the cannulation time, and incidence of complications. RESULTS: Two hundred eighty-five patients were statistically analyzed. The success rate of first attempt was 91.6% in the M-LAINUT group (n = 143) and 57.7% in the C-PT group (n = 142; P < .001) (odds ratio, 7.9; 95% confidence interval, 4.0–15.7). The total success rate (≤5 minutes and ≤3 attempts) in the M-LAINUT group was 97.9%, compared to 84.5% in the palpation group (P < .001) (odds ratio, 8.5; 95% confidence interval, 2.5–29.2). The total cannulation time was shorter and the number of attempts was fewer in the M-LAINUT group than that in the C-PT group (P < .05). The incidence of hematoma in the C-PT group was 19.7%, which was significantly higher than the 2.8% in the M-LAINUT group (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Modified long-axis in-plane ultrasound-guided radial artery cannulation can increase the first and total radial artery cannulation success rates, reduce the number of attempts, and shorten the total cannulation time in adults. Wolters Kluwer Health 2020-01-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6959944/ /pubmed/31914094 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000018747 Text en Copyright © 2020 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
spellingShingle | 3300 Wang, Jiebo Lai, Zhongmeng Weng, Xianfeng Lin, Yong Wu, Guohua Su, Jiansheng Huang, Qijian Zeng, Jian Liu, Junle Zhao, Zisong Yan, Ting Zhang, Liangcheng Zhou, Linying Modified long-axis in-plane ultrasound technique versus conventional palpation technique for radial arterial cannulation: A prospective randomized controlled trial |
title | Modified long-axis in-plane ultrasound technique versus conventional palpation technique for radial arterial cannulation: A prospective randomized controlled trial |
title_full | Modified long-axis in-plane ultrasound technique versus conventional palpation technique for radial arterial cannulation: A prospective randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Modified long-axis in-plane ultrasound technique versus conventional palpation technique for radial arterial cannulation: A prospective randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Modified long-axis in-plane ultrasound technique versus conventional palpation technique for radial arterial cannulation: A prospective randomized controlled trial |
title_short | Modified long-axis in-plane ultrasound technique versus conventional palpation technique for radial arterial cannulation: A prospective randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | modified long-axis in-plane ultrasound technique versus conventional palpation technique for radial arterial cannulation: a prospective randomized controlled trial |
topic | 3300 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6959944/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31914094 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000018747 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wangjiebo modifiedlongaxisinplaneultrasoundtechniqueversusconventionalpalpationtechniqueforradialarterialcannulationaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial AT laizhongmeng modifiedlongaxisinplaneultrasoundtechniqueversusconventionalpalpationtechniqueforradialarterialcannulationaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial AT wengxianfeng modifiedlongaxisinplaneultrasoundtechniqueversusconventionalpalpationtechniqueforradialarterialcannulationaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial AT linyong modifiedlongaxisinplaneultrasoundtechniqueversusconventionalpalpationtechniqueforradialarterialcannulationaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial AT wuguohua modifiedlongaxisinplaneultrasoundtechniqueversusconventionalpalpationtechniqueforradialarterialcannulationaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial AT sujiansheng modifiedlongaxisinplaneultrasoundtechniqueversusconventionalpalpationtechniqueforradialarterialcannulationaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial AT huangqijian modifiedlongaxisinplaneultrasoundtechniqueversusconventionalpalpationtechniqueforradialarterialcannulationaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial AT zengjian modifiedlongaxisinplaneultrasoundtechniqueversusconventionalpalpationtechniqueforradialarterialcannulationaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial AT liujunle modifiedlongaxisinplaneultrasoundtechniqueversusconventionalpalpationtechniqueforradialarterialcannulationaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial AT zhaozisong modifiedlongaxisinplaneultrasoundtechniqueversusconventionalpalpationtechniqueforradialarterialcannulationaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial AT yanting modifiedlongaxisinplaneultrasoundtechniqueversusconventionalpalpationtechniqueforradialarterialcannulationaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial AT zhangliangcheng modifiedlongaxisinplaneultrasoundtechniqueversusconventionalpalpationtechniqueforradialarterialcannulationaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial AT zhoulinying modifiedlongaxisinplaneultrasoundtechniqueversusconventionalpalpationtechniqueforradialarterialcannulationaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial |