Cargando…

Modified long-axis in-plane ultrasound technique versus conventional palpation technique for radial arterial cannulation: A prospective randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: A low first-pass success rate of radial artery cannulation was obtained when using the conventional palpation technique (C-PT) or conventional ultrasound-guided techniques, we; therefore, evaluate the effect of a modified long-axis in-plane ultrasound technique (M-LAINUT) in guiding radi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Jiebo, Lai, Zhongmeng, Weng, Xianfeng, Lin, Yong, Wu, Guohua, Su, Jiansheng, Huang, Qijian, Zeng, Jian, Liu, Junle, Zhao, Zisong, Yan, Ting, Zhang, Liangcheng, Zhou, Linying
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6959944/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31914094
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000018747
_version_ 1783487685527076864
author Wang, Jiebo
Lai, Zhongmeng
Weng, Xianfeng
Lin, Yong
Wu, Guohua
Su, Jiansheng
Huang, Qijian
Zeng, Jian
Liu, Junle
Zhao, Zisong
Yan, Ting
Zhang, Liangcheng
Zhou, Linying
author_facet Wang, Jiebo
Lai, Zhongmeng
Weng, Xianfeng
Lin, Yong
Wu, Guohua
Su, Jiansheng
Huang, Qijian
Zeng, Jian
Liu, Junle
Zhao, Zisong
Yan, Ting
Zhang, Liangcheng
Zhou, Linying
author_sort Wang, Jiebo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A low first-pass success rate of radial artery cannulation was obtained when using the conventional palpation technique (C-PT) or conventional ultrasound-guided techniques, we; therefore, evaluate the effect of a modified long-axis in-plane ultrasound technique (M-LAINUT) in guiding radial artery cannulation in adults. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, randomized and controlled clinical trial of 288 patients undergoing radial artery cannulation. Patients were randomized 1:1 to M-LAINUT or C-PT group at Fujian Medical University Union Hospital between 2017 and 2018. Radial artery cannulation was performed by 3 anesthesiologists with different experience. The outcome was the first and total radial artery cannulation success rates, the number of attempts and the cannulation time, and incidence of complications. RESULTS: Two hundred eighty-five patients were statistically analyzed. The success rate of first attempt was 91.6% in the M-LAINUT group (n = 143) and 57.7% in the C-PT group (n = 142; P < .001) (odds ratio, 7.9; 95% confidence interval, 4.0–15.7). The total success rate (≤5 minutes and ≤3 attempts) in the M-LAINUT group was 97.9%, compared to 84.5% in the palpation group (P < .001) (odds ratio, 8.5; 95% confidence interval, 2.5–29.2). The total cannulation time was shorter and the number of attempts was fewer in the M-LAINUT group than that in the C-PT group (P < .05). The incidence of hematoma in the C-PT group was 19.7%, which was significantly higher than the 2.8% in the M-LAINUT group (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Modified long-axis in-plane ultrasound-guided radial artery cannulation can increase the first and total radial artery cannulation success rates, reduce the number of attempts, and shorten the total cannulation time in adults.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6959944
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69599442020-01-31 Modified long-axis in-plane ultrasound technique versus conventional palpation technique for radial arterial cannulation: A prospective randomized controlled trial Wang, Jiebo Lai, Zhongmeng Weng, Xianfeng Lin, Yong Wu, Guohua Su, Jiansheng Huang, Qijian Zeng, Jian Liu, Junle Zhao, Zisong Yan, Ting Zhang, Liangcheng Zhou, Linying Medicine (Baltimore) 3300 BACKGROUND: A low first-pass success rate of radial artery cannulation was obtained when using the conventional palpation technique (C-PT) or conventional ultrasound-guided techniques, we; therefore, evaluate the effect of a modified long-axis in-plane ultrasound technique (M-LAINUT) in guiding radial artery cannulation in adults. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, randomized and controlled clinical trial of 288 patients undergoing radial artery cannulation. Patients were randomized 1:1 to M-LAINUT or C-PT group at Fujian Medical University Union Hospital between 2017 and 2018. Radial artery cannulation was performed by 3 anesthesiologists with different experience. The outcome was the first and total radial artery cannulation success rates, the number of attempts and the cannulation time, and incidence of complications. RESULTS: Two hundred eighty-five patients were statistically analyzed. The success rate of first attempt was 91.6% in the M-LAINUT group (n = 143) and 57.7% in the C-PT group (n = 142; P < .001) (odds ratio, 7.9; 95% confidence interval, 4.0–15.7). The total success rate (≤5 minutes and ≤3 attempts) in the M-LAINUT group was 97.9%, compared to 84.5% in the palpation group (P < .001) (odds ratio, 8.5; 95% confidence interval, 2.5–29.2). The total cannulation time was shorter and the number of attempts was fewer in the M-LAINUT group than that in the C-PT group (P < .05). The incidence of hematoma in the C-PT group was 19.7%, which was significantly higher than the 2.8% in the M-LAINUT group (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Modified long-axis in-plane ultrasound-guided radial artery cannulation can increase the first and total radial artery cannulation success rates, reduce the number of attempts, and shorten the total cannulation time in adults. Wolters Kluwer Health 2020-01-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6959944/ /pubmed/31914094 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000018747 Text en Copyright © 2020 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
spellingShingle 3300
Wang, Jiebo
Lai, Zhongmeng
Weng, Xianfeng
Lin, Yong
Wu, Guohua
Su, Jiansheng
Huang, Qijian
Zeng, Jian
Liu, Junle
Zhao, Zisong
Yan, Ting
Zhang, Liangcheng
Zhou, Linying
Modified long-axis in-plane ultrasound technique versus conventional palpation technique for radial arterial cannulation: A prospective randomized controlled trial
title Modified long-axis in-plane ultrasound technique versus conventional palpation technique for radial arterial cannulation: A prospective randomized controlled trial
title_full Modified long-axis in-plane ultrasound technique versus conventional palpation technique for radial arterial cannulation: A prospective randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Modified long-axis in-plane ultrasound technique versus conventional palpation technique for radial arterial cannulation: A prospective randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Modified long-axis in-plane ultrasound technique versus conventional palpation technique for radial arterial cannulation: A prospective randomized controlled trial
title_short Modified long-axis in-plane ultrasound technique versus conventional palpation technique for radial arterial cannulation: A prospective randomized controlled trial
title_sort modified long-axis in-plane ultrasound technique versus conventional palpation technique for radial arterial cannulation: a prospective randomized controlled trial
topic 3300
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6959944/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31914094
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000018747
work_keys_str_mv AT wangjiebo modifiedlongaxisinplaneultrasoundtechniqueversusconventionalpalpationtechniqueforradialarterialcannulationaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT laizhongmeng modifiedlongaxisinplaneultrasoundtechniqueversusconventionalpalpationtechniqueforradialarterialcannulationaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT wengxianfeng modifiedlongaxisinplaneultrasoundtechniqueversusconventionalpalpationtechniqueforradialarterialcannulationaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT linyong modifiedlongaxisinplaneultrasoundtechniqueversusconventionalpalpationtechniqueforradialarterialcannulationaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT wuguohua modifiedlongaxisinplaneultrasoundtechniqueversusconventionalpalpationtechniqueforradialarterialcannulationaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT sujiansheng modifiedlongaxisinplaneultrasoundtechniqueversusconventionalpalpationtechniqueforradialarterialcannulationaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT huangqijian modifiedlongaxisinplaneultrasoundtechniqueversusconventionalpalpationtechniqueforradialarterialcannulationaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT zengjian modifiedlongaxisinplaneultrasoundtechniqueversusconventionalpalpationtechniqueforradialarterialcannulationaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT liujunle modifiedlongaxisinplaneultrasoundtechniqueversusconventionalpalpationtechniqueforradialarterialcannulationaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT zhaozisong modifiedlongaxisinplaneultrasoundtechniqueversusconventionalpalpationtechniqueforradialarterialcannulationaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT yanting modifiedlongaxisinplaneultrasoundtechniqueversusconventionalpalpationtechniqueforradialarterialcannulationaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT zhangliangcheng modifiedlongaxisinplaneultrasoundtechniqueversusconventionalpalpationtechniqueforradialarterialcannulationaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT zhoulinying modifiedlongaxisinplaneultrasoundtechniqueversusconventionalpalpationtechniqueforradialarterialcannulationaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial