Cargando…

Peer Presence Effects on Eye Movements and Attentional Performance

“Social facilitation” refers to the enhancement or impairment of performance engendered by the mere presence of others. It has been demonstrated for a diversity of behaviors. This study assessed whether it also concerns attention and eye movements and if yes, which decision-making mechanisms it affe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tricoche, Leslie, Ferrand-Verdejo, Johan, Pélisson, Denis, Meunier, Martine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6960111/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31969810
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2019.00280
_version_ 1783487720416346112
author Tricoche, Leslie
Ferrand-Verdejo, Johan
Pélisson, Denis
Meunier, Martine
author_facet Tricoche, Leslie
Ferrand-Verdejo, Johan
Pélisson, Denis
Meunier, Martine
author_sort Tricoche, Leslie
collection PubMed
description “Social facilitation” refers to the enhancement or impairment of performance engendered by the mere presence of others. It has been demonstrated for a diversity of behaviors. This study assessed whether it also concerns attention and eye movements and if yes, which decision-making mechanisms it affects. Human volunteers were tested in three different tasks (saccades, visual search, and continuous performance) either alone or in the presence of a familiar peer. The results failed to reveal any significant peer influence on the visual search and continuous performance tasks. For saccades, by contrast, they showed a negative or positive peer influence depending on the complexity of the testing protocol. Pro-and anti-saccades were both inhibited when pseudorandomly mixed, and both facilitated when performed separately. Peer presence impaired or improved reaction times, i.e., the speed to initiate the saccade, as well as peak velocity, i.e., the driving force moving the eye toward the target. Effect sizes were large, with Cohen’s d-values ranging for reaction times (RTs) from 0.50 to 0.95. Analyzing RT distributions using the LATER (Linear Approach to Threshold with Ergodic Rate) model revealed that social inhibition of pro- and anti-saccades in the complex protocol was associated with a significant increase in the rate of rise. The present demonstration that the simple presence of a familiar peer can inhibit or facilitate saccades depending on task difficulty strengthens a growing body of evidence showing social modulations of eye movements and attention processes. The present lack of effect on visual search and continuous performance tasks contrasts with peer presence effects reported earlier using similar tasks, and future studies are needed to determine whether it is due to an intermediate level of difficulty maximizing individual variability. Together with an earlier study of the social inhibition of anti-saccades also using the LATER model, which showed an increase of the threshold, the present increase of the rate of rise suggests that peer presence can influence both the top-down and bottom-up attention-related processes guiding the decision to move the eyes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6960111
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69601112020-01-22 Peer Presence Effects on Eye Movements and Attentional Performance Tricoche, Leslie Ferrand-Verdejo, Johan Pélisson, Denis Meunier, Martine Front Behav Neurosci Behavioral Neuroscience “Social facilitation” refers to the enhancement or impairment of performance engendered by the mere presence of others. It has been demonstrated for a diversity of behaviors. This study assessed whether it also concerns attention and eye movements and if yes, which decision-making mechanisms it affects. Human volunteers were tested in three different tasks (saccades, visual search, and continuous performance) either alone or in the presence of a familiar peer. The results failed to reveal any significant peer influence on the visual search and continuous performance tasks. For saccades, by contrast, they showed a negative or positive peer influence depending on the complexity of the testing protocol. Pro-and anti-saccades were both inhibited when pseudorandomly mixed, and both facilitated when performed separately. Peer presence impaired or improved reaction times, i.e., the speed to initiate the saccade, as well as peak velocity, i.e., the driving force moving the eye toward the target. Effect sizes were large, with Cohen’s d-values ranging for reaction times (RTs) from 0.50 to 0.95. Analyzing RT distributions using the LATER (Linear Approach to Threshold with Ergodic Rate) model revealed that social inhibition of pro- and anti-saccades in the complex protocol was associated with a significant increase in the rate of rise. The present demonstration that the simple presence of a familiar peer can inhibit or facilitate saccades depending on task difficulty strengthens a growing body of evidence showing social modulations of eye movements and attention processes. The present lack of effect on visual search and continuous performance tasks contrasts with peer presence effects reported earlier using similar tasks, and future studies are needed to determine whether it is due to an intermediate level of difficulty maximizing individual variability. Together with an earlier study of the social inhibition of anti-saccades also using the LATER model, which showed an increase of the threshold, the present increase of the rate of rise suggests that peer presence can influence both the top-down and bottom-up attention-related processes guiding the decision to move the eyes. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-01-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6960111/ /pubmed/31969810 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2019.00280 Text en Copyright © 2020 Tricoche, Ferrand-Verdejo, Pélisson and Meunier. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Behavioral Neuroscience
Tricoche, Leslie
Ferrand-Verdejo, Johan
Pélisson, Denis
Meunier, Martine
Peer Presence Effects on Eye Movements and Attentional Performance
title Peer Presence Effects on Eye Movements and Attentional Performance
title_full Peer Presence Effects on Eye Movements and Attentional Performance
title_fullStr Peer Presence Effects on Eye Movements and Attentional Performance
title_full_unstemmed Peer Presence Effects on Eye Movements and Attentional Performance
title_short Peer Presence Effects on Eye Movements and Attentional Performance
title_sort peer presence effects on eye movements and attentional performance
topic Behavioral Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6960111/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31969810
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2019.00280
work_keys_str_mv AT tricocheleslie peerpresenceeffectsoneyemovementsandattentionalperformance
AT ferrandverdejojohan peerpresenceeffectsoneyemovementsandattentionalperformance
AT pelissondenis peerpresenceeffectsoneyemovementsandattentionalperformance
AT meuniermartine peerpresenceeffectsoneyemovementsandattentionalperformance