Cargando…

Applications and Perspectives of Cascade Reactions in Bacterial Infection Control

Cascade reactions integrate two or more reactions, of which each subsequent reaction can only start when the previous reaction step is completed. Employing natural substrates in the human body such as glucose and oxygen, cascade reactions can generate reactive oxygen species (ROS) to kill tumor cell...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Yuanfeng, Yang, Guang, Ren, Yijin, Shi, Linqi, Ma, Rujiang, van der Mei, Henny C., Busscher, Henk J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6960124/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31970146
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2019.00861
_version_ 1783487723516985344
author Li, Yuanfeng
Yang, Guang
Ren, Yijin
Shi, Linqi
Ma, Rujiang
van der Mei, Henny C.
Busscher, Henk J.
author_facet Li, Yuanfeng
Yang, Guang
Ren, Yijin
Shi, Linqi
Ma, Rujiang
van der Mei, Henny C.
Busscher, Henk J.
author_sort Li, Yuanfeng
collection PubMed
description Cascade reactions integrate two or more reactions, of which each subsequent reaction can only start when the previous reaction step is completed. Employing natural substrates in the human body such as glucose and oxygen, cascade reactions can generate reactive oxygen species (ROS) to kill tumor cells, but cascade reactions may also have potential as a direly needed, novel bacterial infection-control strategy. ROS can disintegrate the EPS matrix of infectious biofilm, disrupt bacterial cell membranes, and damage intra-cellular DNA. Application of cascade reactions producing ROS as a new infection-control strategy is still in its infancy. The main advantages for infection-control cascade reactions include the fact that they are non-antibiotic based and induction of ROS resistance is unlikely. However, the amount of ROS generated is generally low and antimicrobial efficacies reported are still far <3–4 log units necessary for clinical efficacy. Increasing the amounts of ROS generated by adding more substrate bears the risk of collateral damage to tissue surrounding an infection site. Collateral tissue damage upon increasing substrate concentrations may be prevented by locally increasing substrate concentrations, for instance, using smart nanocarriers. Smart, pH-responsive nanocarriers can self-target and accumulate in infectious biofilms from the blood circulation to confine ROS production inside the biofilm to yield long-term presence of ROS, despite the short lifetime (nanoseconds) of individual ROS molecules. Increasing bacterial killing efficacies using cascade reaction components containing nanocarriers constitutes a first, major challenge in the development of infection-control cascade reactions. Nevertheless, their use in combination with clinical antibiotic treatment may already yield synergistic effects, but this remains to be established for cascade reactions. Furthermore, specific patient groups possessing elevated levels of endogenous substrate (for instance, diabetic or cancer patients) may benefit from the use of cascade reaction components containing nanocarriers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6960124
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69601242020-01-22 Applications and Perspectives of Cascade Reactions in Bacterial Infection Control Li, Yuanfeng Yang, Guang Ren, Yijin Shi, Linqi Ma, Rujiang van der Mei, Henny C. Busscher, Henk J. Front Chem Chemistry Cascade reactions integrate two or more reactions, of which each subsequent reaction can only start when the previous reaction step is completed. Employing natural substrates in the human body such as glucose and oxygen, cascade reactions can generate reactive oxygen species (ROS) to kill tumor cells, but cascade reactions may also have potential as a direly needed, novel bacterial infection-control strategy. ROS can disintegrate the EPS matrix of infectious biofilm, disrupt bacterial cell membranes, and damage intra-cellular DNA. Application of cascade reactions producing ROS as a new infection-control strategy is still in its infancy. The main advantages for infection-control cascade reactions include the fact that they are non-antibiotic based and induction of ROS resistance is unlikely. However, the amount of ROS generated is generally low and antimicrobial efficacies reported are still far <3–4 log units necessary for clinical efficacy. Increasing the amounts of ROS generated by adding more substrate bears the risk of collateral damage to tissue surrounding an infection site. Collateral tissue damage upon increasing substrate concentrations may be prevented by locally increasing substrate concentrations, for instance, using smart nanocarriers. Smart, pH-responsive nanocarriers can self-target and accumulate in infectious biofilms from the blood circulation to confine ROS production inside the biofilm to yield long-term presence of ROS, despite the short lifetime (nanoseconds) of individual ROS molecules. Increasing bacterial killing efficacies using cascade reaction components containing nanocarriers constitutes a first, major challenge in the development of infection-control cascade reactions. Nevertheless, their use in combination with clinical antibiotic treatment may already yield synergistic effects, but this remains to be established for cascade reactions. Furthermore, specific patient groups possessing elevated levels of endogenous substrate (for instance, diabetic or cancer patients) may benefit from the use of cascade reaction components containing nanocarriers. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-01-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6960124/ /pubmed/31970146 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2019.00861 Text en Copyright © 2020 Li, Yang, Ren, Shi, Ma, van der Mei and Busscher. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Chemistry
Li, Yuanfeng
Yang, Guang
Ren, Yijin
Shi, Linqi
Ma, Rujiang
van der Mei, Henny C.
Busscher, Henk J.
Applications and Perspectives of Cascade Reactions in Bacterial Infection Control
title Applications and Perspectives of Cascade Reactions in Bacterial Infection Control
title_full Applications and Perspectives of Cascade Reactions in Bacterial Infection Control
title_fullStr Applications and Perspectives of Cascade Reactions in Bacterial Infection Control
title_full_unstemmed Applications and Perspectives of Cascade Reactions in Bacterial Infection Control
title_short Applications and Perspectives of Cascade Reactions in Bacterial Infection Control
title_sort applications and perspectives of cascade reactions in bacterial infection control
topic Chemistry
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6960124/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31970146
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2019.00861
work_keys_str_mv AT liyuanfeng applicationsandperspectivesofcascadereactionsinbacterialinfectioncontrol
AT yangguang applicationsandperspectivesofcascadereactionsinbacterialinfectioncontrol
AT renyijin applicationsandperspectivesofcascadereactionsinbacterialinfectioncontrol
AT shilinqi applicationsandperspectivesofcascadereactionsinbacterialinfectioncontrol
AT marujiang applicationsandperspectivesofcascadereactionsinbacterialinfectioncontrol
AT vandermeihennyc applicationsandperspectivesofcascadereactionsinbacterialinfectioncontrol
AT busscherhenkj applicationsandperspectivesofcascadereactionsinbacterialinfectioncontrol