Cargando…
Applications and Perspectives of Cascade Reactions in Bacterial Infection Control
Cascade reactions integrate two or more reactions, of which each subsequent reaction can only start when the previous reaction step is completed. Employing natural substrates in the human body such as glucose and oxygen, cascade reactions can generate reactive oxygen species (ROS) to kill tumor cell...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6960124/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31970146 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2019.00861 |
_version_ | 1783487723516985344 |
---|---|
author | Li, Yuanfeng Yang, Guang Ren, Yijin Shi, Linqi Ma, Rujiang van der Mei, Henny C. Busscher, Henk J. |
author_facet | Li, Yuanfeng Yang, Guang Ren, Yijin Shi, Linqi Ma, Rujiang van der Mei, Henny C. Busscher, Henk J. |
author_sort | Li, Yuanfeng |
collection | PubMed |
description | Cascade reactions integrate two or more reactions, of which each subsequent reaction can only start when the previous reaction step is completed. Employing natural substrates in the human body such as glucose and oxygen, cascade reactions can generate reactive oxygen species (ROS) to kill tumor cells, but cascade reactions may also have potential as a direly needed, novel bacterial infection-control strategy. ROS can disintegrate the EPS matrix of infectious biofilm, disrupt bacterial cell membranes, and damage intra-cellular DNA. Application of cascade reactions producing ROS as a new infection-control strategy is still in its infancy. The main advantages for infection-control cascade reactions include the fact that they are non-antibiotic based and induction of ROS resistance is unlikely. However, the amount of ROS generated is generally low and antimicrobial efficacies reported are still far <3–4 log units necessary for clinical efficacy. Increasing the amounts of ROS generated by adding more substrate bears the risk of collateral damage to tissue surrounding an infection site. Collateral tissue damage upon increasing substrate concentrations may be prevented by locally increasing substrate concentrations, for instance, using smart nanocarriers. Smart, pH-responsive nanocarriers can self-target and accumulate in infectious biofilms from the blood circulation to confine ROS production inside the biofilm to yield long-term presence of ROS, despite the short lifetime (nanoseconds) of individual ROS molecules. Increasing bacterial killing efficacies using cascade reaction components containing nanocarriers constitutes a first, major challenge in the development of infection-control cascade reactions. Nevertheless, their use in combination with clinical antibiotic treatment may already yield synergistic effects, but this remains to be established for cascade reactions. Furthermore, specific patient groups possessing elevated levels of endogenous substrate (for instance, diabetic or cancer patients) may benefit from the use of cascade reaction components containing nanocarriers. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6960124 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69601242020-01-22 Applications and Perspectives of Cascade Reactions in Bacterial Infection Control Li, Yuanfeng Yang, Guang Ren, Yijin Shi, Linqi Ma, Rujiang van der Mei, Henny C. Busscher, Henk J. Front Chem Chemistry Cascade reactions integrate two or more reactions, of which each subsequent reaction can only start when the previous reaction step is completed. Employing natural substrates in the human body such as glucose and oxygen, cascade reactions can generate reactive oxygen species (ROS) to kill tumor cells, but cascade reactions may also have potential as a direly needed, novel bacterial infection-control strategy. ROS can disintegrate the EPS matrix of infectious biofilm, disrupt bacterial cell membranes, and damage intra-cellular DNA. Application of cascade reactions producing ROS as a new infection-control strategy is still in its infancy. The main advantages for infection-control cascade reactions include the fact that they are non-antibiotic based and induction of ROS resistance is unlikely. However, the amount of ROS generated is generally low and antimicrobial efficacies reported are still far <3–4 log units necessary for clinical efficacy. Increasing the amounts of ROS generated by adding more substrate bears the risk of collateral damage to tissue surrounding an infection site. Collateral tissue damage upon increasing substrate concentrations may be prevented by locally increasing substrate concentrations, for instance, using smart nanocarriers. Smart, pH-responsive nanocarriers can self-target and accumulate in infectious biofilms from the blood circulation to confine ROS production inside the biofilm to yield long-term presence of ROS, despite the short lifetime (nanoseconds) of individual ROS molecules. Increasing bacterial killing efficacies using cascade reaction components containing nanocarriers constitutes a first, major challenge in the development of infection-control cascade reactions. Nevertheless, their use in combination with clinical antibiotic treatment may already yield synergistic effects, but this remains to be established for cascade reactions. Furthermore, specific patient groups possessing elevated levels of endogenous substrate (for instance, diabetic or cancer patients) may benefit from the use of cascade reaction components containing nanocarriers. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-01-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6960124/ /pubmed/31970146 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2019.00861 Text en Copyright © 2020 Li, Yang, Ren, Shi, Ma, van der Mei and Busscher. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Chemistry Li, Yuanfeng Yang, Guang Ren, Yijin Shi, Linqi Ma, Rujiang van der Mei, Henny C. Busscher, Henk J. Applications and Perspectives of Cascade Reactions in Bacterial Infection Control |
title | Applications and Perspectives of Cascade Reactions in Bacterial Infection Control |
title_full | Applications and Perspectives of Cascade Reactions in Bacterial Infection Control |
title_fullStr | Applications and Perspectives of Cascade Reactions in Bacterial Infection Control |
title_full_unstemmed | Applications and Perspectives of Cascade Reactions in Bacterial Infection Control |
title_short | Applications and Perspectives of Cascade Reactions in Bacterial Infection Control |
title_sort | applications and perspectives of cascade reactions in bacterial infection control |
topic | Chemistry |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6960124/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31970146 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2019.00861 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liyuanfeng applicationsandperspectivesofcascadereactionsinbacterialinfectioncontrol AT yangguang applicationsandperspectivesofcascadereactionsinbacterialinfectioncontrol AT renyijin applicationsandperspectivesofcascadereactionsinbacterialinfectioncontrol AT shilinqi applicationsandperspectivesofcascadereactionsinbacterialinfectioncontrol AT marujiang applicationsandperspectivesofcascadereactionsinbacterialinfectioncontrol AT vandermeihennyc applicationsandperspectivesofcascadereactionsinbacterialinfectioncontrol AT busscherhenkj applicationsandperspectivesofcascadereactionsinbacterialinfectioncontrol |