Cargando…

Critical Review of Exposure and Effects: Implications for Setting Regulatory Health Criteria for Ingested Copper

Decades of study indicate that copper oral exposures are typically not a human health concern. Ingesting high levels of soluble copper salts can cause acute gastrointestinal symptoms and, in uncommon cases, liver toxicity in susceptible individuals with repeated exposure. This focused toxicological...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Taylor, Alicia A., Tsuji, Joyce S., Garry, Michael R., McArdle, Margaret E., Goodfellow, William L., Adams, William J., Menzie, Charles A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6960211/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31832729
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00267-019-01234-y
_version_ 1783487744027131904
author Taylor, Alicia A.
Tsuji, Joyce S.
Garry, Michael R.
McArdle, Margaret E.
Goodfellow, William L.
Adams, William J.
Menzie, Charles A.
author_facet Taylor, Alicia A.
Tsuji, Joyce S.
Garry, Michael R.
McArdle, Margaret E.
Goodfellow, William L.
Adams, William J.
Menzie, Charles A.
author_sort Taylor, Alicia A.
collection PubMed
description Decades of study indicate that copper oral exposures are typically not a human health concern. Ingesting high levels of soluble copper salts can cause acute gastrointestinal symptoms and, in uncommon cases, liver toxicity in susceptible individuals with repeated exposure. This focused toxicological review evaluated the current literature since the last comprehensive reviews (2007–2010). Our review identified limitations in the existing United States and international guidance for determining an oral reference dose (RfD) for essential metals like copper. Instead, an alternative method using categorical regression analysis to develop an optimal dose that considers deficiency, toxicity, and integrates information from human and animal studies was reviewed for interpreting an oral RfD for copper. We also considered subchronic or chronic toxicity from genetic susceptibility to copper dysregulation leading to rare occurrences of liver and other organ toxicity with elevated copper exposure. Based on this approach, an oral RfD of 0.04 mg Cu/kg/day would be protective of acute or chronic toxicity in adults and children. This RfD is also protective for possible genetic susceptibility to elevated copper exposure and allows for background dietary exposures. This dose is not intended to be protective of patients with rare genetic disorders for copper sensitivity within typical nutritional intake ranges, nor is it protective for those with excessive supplement intake. Less soluble mineral forms of copper in soil have reduced bioavailability as compared with more soluble copper in water and diet, which should be considered in using this RfD for risk assessments of copper.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6960211
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69602112020-01-29 Critical Review of Exposure and Effects: Implications for Setting Regulatory Health Criteria for Ingested Copper Taylor, Alicia A. Tsuji, Joyce S. Garry, Michael R. McArdle, Margaret E. Goodfellow, William L. Adams, William J. Menzie, Charles A. Environ Manage Original Article Decades of study indicate that copper oral exposures are typically not a human health concern. Ingesting high levels of soluble copper salts can cause acute gastrointestinal symptoms and, in uncommon cases, liver toxicity in susceptible individuals with repeated exposure. This focused toxicological review evaluated the current literature since the last comprehensive reviews (2007–2010). Our review identified limitations in the existing United States and international guidance for determining an oral reference dose (RfD) for essential metals like copper. Instead, an alternative method using categorical regression analysis to develop an optimal dose that considers deficiency, toxicity, and integrates information from human and animal studies was reviewed for interpreting an oral RfD for copper. We also considered subchronic or chronic toxicity from genetic susceptibility to copper dysregulation leading to rare occurrences of liver and other organ toxicity with elevated copper exposure. Based on this approach, an oral RfD of 0.04 mg Cu/kg/day would be protective of acute or chronic toxicity in adults and children. This RfD is also protective for possible genetic susceptibility to elevated copper exposure and allows for background dietary exposures. This dose is not intended to be protective of patients with rare genetic disorders for copper sensitivity within typical nutritional intake ranges, nor is it protective for those with excessive supplement intake. Less soluble mineral forms of copper in soil have reduced bioavailability as compared with more soluble copper in water and diet, which should be considered in using this RfD for risk assessments of copper. Springer US 2019-12-12 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC6960211/ /pubmed/31832729 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00267-019-01234-y Text en © The Author(s) 2019, corrected publication 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Taylor, Alicia A.
Tsuji, Joyce S.
Garry, Michael R.
McArdle, Margaret E.
Goodfellow, William L.
Adams, William J.
Menzie, Charles A.
Critical Review of Exposure and Effects: Implications for Setting Regulatory Health Criteria for Ingested Copper
title Critical Review of Exposure and Effects: Implications for Setting Regulatory Health Criteria for Ingested Copper
title_full Critical Review of Exposure and Effects: Implications for Setting Regulatory Health Criteria for Ingested Copper
title_fullStr Critical Review of Exposure and Effects: Implications for Setting Regulatory Health Criteria for Ingested Copper
title_full_unstemmed Critical Review of Exposure and Effects: Implications for Setting Regulatory Health Criteria for Ingested Copper
title_short Critical Review of Exposure and Effects: Implications for Setting Regulatory Health Criteria for Ingested Copper
title_sort critical review of exposure and effects: implications for setting regulatory health criteria for ingested copper
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6960211/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31832729
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00267-019-01234-y
work_keys_str_mv AT tayloraliciaa criticalreviewofexposureandeffectsimplicationsforsettingregulatoryhealthcriteriaforingestedcopper
AT tsujijoyces criticalreviewofexposureandeffectsimplicationsforsettingregulatoryhealthcriteriaforingestedcopper
AT garrymichaelr criticalreviewofexposureandeffectsimplicationsforsettingregulatoryhealthcriteriaforingestedcopper
AT mcardlemargarete criticalreviewofexposureandeffectsimplicationsforsettingregulatoryhealthcriteriaforingestedcopper
AT goodfellowwilliaml criticalreviewofexposureandeffectsimplicationsforsettingregulatoryhealthcriteriaforingestedcopper
AT adamswilliamj criticalreviewofexposureandeffectsimplicationsforsettingregulatoryhealthcriteriaforingestedcopper
AT menziecharlesa criticalreviewofexposureandeffectsimplicationsforsettingregulatoryhealthcriteriaforingestedcopper