Quantitative evaluation of the progressive wear of powered interproximal reduction systems after repeated use: An in vitro study

PURPOSE: To evaluate the residual surface roughness of 5 common diamond-coated interproximal reduction (IPR) systems after consecutive in vitro applications in relation to system, diamond grain size, and instrument thickness. METHODS: IPR was performed on 80 extracted human incisors using motor-driven strips and discs under predefined conditions. The IPR auxiliaries were applied at 5 consecutive sessions of 20 s on intact interproximal surfaces, and the surface profile (R(a), R(z), R(max)) was analyzed at baseline and after each session with an optical profilometer. RESULTS: No overall significant difference in the roughness values was found between systems (P = 0.07 for R(a), P = 0.33 for R(z), and P = 0.48 for R(max)). There was a significant average decrease of R(a), R(z), and R(max) for all systems for every unit increase in time by −0.171 μm (P < 0.001), −3.297 (P ≤ 0.001), and −2.788 μm (P = 0.001), respectively. R(a), R(z), and R(max) values increased significantly, i.e., by 0.194 μm (P = 0.003), 5.890 μm (P = 0.001), and 5.319 μm (P = 0.010) as instrument thickness increased by one unit. No significant reductions in R(a), R(z), and R(max) were observed across grain sizes (−0.008 μm [P > 0.05], −0.244 μm [P > 0.05], and −0.179 μm [P > 0.05], respectively). There was no evidence of interaction between system and time as the P values for R(a), R(z), and R(max) were 0.88, 0.51, and 0.70, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: All IPR materials presented significant gradual decrease of surface roughness after repeated applications. There were no significant roughness changes among auxiliaries of different grain sizes. Thinner auxiliaries showed significantly more roughness reduction, possibly requiring more frequent replacement than thick auxiliaries in clinical practice.