Cargando…
A comparison of biofiltration performance based on bacteria and fungi for treating toluene vapors from airflow
With increasing concerns about industrial gas contaminants and the growing demand for durable and sustainable technologies, attentions have been gradually shifted to biological air pollution controls. The ability of Pseudomonas putida PTCC 1694 (bacteria) and Pleurotus ostreatus IRAN 1781C (fungus)...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6960271/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31938898 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13568-019-0941-z |
_version_ | 1783487758101118976 |
---|---|
author | Ghasemi, Roohollah Golbabaei, Farideh Rezaei, Sasan Pourmand, Mohammad Reza Nabizadeh, Ramin Jafari, Mohammad Javad masoorian, Ensieh |
author_facet | Ghasemi, Roohollah Golbabaei, Farideh Rezaei, Sasan Pourmand, Mohammad Reza Nabizadeh, Ramin Jafari, Mohammad Javad masoorian, Ensieh |
author_sort | Ghasemi, Roohollah |
collection | PubMed |
description | With increasing concerns about industrial gas contaminants and the growing demand for durable and sustainable technologies, attentions have been gradually shifted to biological air pollution controls. The ability of Pseudomonas putida PTCC 1694 (bacteria) and Pleurotus ostreatus IRAN 1781C (fungus) to treat contaminated gas stream with toluene and its biological degradation was compared under similar operating conditions. For this purpose, a biofilter on the laboratory scale was designed and constructed and the tests were carried out in two stages. The first stage, bacterial testing, lasted 20 days and the second stage, fungal testing, lasted 16 days. Inlet loading rates (IL) for bacterial and fungal biofilters were 21.62 ± 6.04 and 26.24 ± 7.35 g/m(3) h respectively. In general, fungal biofilter showed a higher elimination capacity (EC) than bacterial biofilter (18.1 ± 6.98 vs 13.7 ± 4.7 g/m(3) h). However, the pressure drop in the fungal biofilter was higher than the bacterial biofilter (1.26 ± 0.3 vs 1 ± 0.3 mm water), which was probably due to the growth of the mycelium. Fungal biofiltration showed a better performance in the removal of toluene from the air stream. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6960271 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69602712020-01-30 A comparison of biofiltration performance based on bacteria and fungi for treating toluene vapors from airflow Ghasemi, Roohollah Golbabaei, Farideh Rezaei, Sasan Pourmand, Mohammad Reza Nabizadeh, Ramin Jafari, Mohammad Javad masoorian, Ensieh AMB Express Original Article With increasing concerns about industrial gas contaminants and the growing demand for durable and sustainable technologies, attentions have been gradually shifted to biological air pollution controls. The ability of Pseudomonas putida PTCC 1694 (bacteria) and Pleurotus ostreatus IRAN 1781C (fungus) to treat contaminated gas stream with toluene and its biological degradation was compared under similar operating conditions. For this purpose, a biofilter on the laboratory scale was designed and constructed and the tests were carried out in two stages. The first stage, bacterial testing, lasted 20 days and the second stage, fungal testing, lasted 16 days. Inlet loading rates (IL) for bacterial and fungal biofilters were 21.62 ± 6.04 and 26.24 ± 7.35 g/m(3) h respectively. In general, fungal biofilter showed a higher elimination capacity (EC) than bacterial biofilter (18.1 ± 6.98 vs 13.7 ± 4.7 g/m(3) h). However, the pressure drop in the fungal biofilter was higher than the bacterial biofilter (1.26 ± 0.3 vs 1 ± 0.3 mm water), which was probably due to the growth of the mycelium. Fungal biofiltration showed a better performance in the removal of toluene from the air stream. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-01-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6960271/ /pubmed/31938898 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13568-019-0941-z Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Ghasemi, Roohollah Golbabaei, Farideh Rezaei, Sasan Pourmand, Mohammad Reza Nabizadeh, Ramin Jafari, Mohammad Javad masoorian, Ensieh A comparison of biofiltration performance based on bacteria and fungi for treating toluene vapors from airflow |
title | A comparison of biofiltration performance based on bacteria and fungi for treating toluene vapors from airflow |
title_full | A comparison of biofiltration performance based on bacteria and fungi for treating toluene vapors from airflow |
title_fullStr | A comparison of biofiltration performance based on bacteria and fungi for treating toluene vapors from airflow |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparison of biofiltration performance based on bacteria and fungi for treating toluene vapors from airflow |
title_short | A comparison of biofiltration performance based on bacteria and fungi for treating toluene vapors from airflow |
title_sort | comparison of biofiltration performance based on bacteria and fungi for treating toluene vapors from airflow |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6960271/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31938898 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13568-019-0941-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ghasemiroohollah acomparisonofbiofiltrationperformancebasedonbacteriaandfungifortreatingtoluenevaporsfromairflow AT golbabaeifarideh acomparisonofbiofiltrationperformancebasedonbacteriaandfungifortreatingtoluenevaporsfromairflow AT rezaeisasan acomparisonofbiofiltrationperformancebasedonbacteriaandfungifortreatingtoluenevaporsfromairflow AT pourmandmohammadreza acomparisonofbiofiltrationperformancebasedonbacteriaandfungifortreatingtoluenevaporsfromairflow AT nabizadehramin acomparisonofbiofiltrationperformancebasedonbacteriaandfungifortreatingtoluenevaporsfromairflow AT jafarimohammadjavad acomparisonofbiofiltrationperformancebasedonbacteriaandfungifortreatingtoluenevaporsfromairflow AT masoorianensieh acomparisonofbiofiltrationperformancebasedonbacteriaandfungifortreatingtoluenevaporsfromairflow AT ghasemiroohollah comparisonofbiofiltrationperformancebasedonbacteriaandfungifortreatingtoluenevaporsfromairflow AT golbabaeifarideh comparisonofbiofiltrationperformancebasedonbacteriaandfungifortreatingtoluenevaporsfromairflow AT rezaeisasan comparisonofbiofiltrationperformancebasedonbacteriaandfungifortreatingtoluenevaporsfromairflow AT pourmandmohammadreza comparisonofbiofiltrationperformancebasedonbacteriaandfungifortreatingtoluenevaporsfromairflow AT nabizadehramin comparisonofbiofiltrationperformancebasedonbacteriaandfungifortreatingtoluenevaporsfromairflow AT jafarimohammadjavad comparisonofbiofiltrationperformancebasedonbacteriaandfungifortreatingtoluenevaporsfromairflow AT masoorianensieh comparisonofbiofiltrationperformancebasedonbacteriaandfungifortreatingtoluenevaporsfromairflow |