Cargando…

A comparison of biofiltration performance based on bacteria and fungi for treating toluene vapors from airflow

With increasing concerns about industrial gas contaminants and the growing demand for durable and sustainable technologies, attentions have been gradually shifted to biological air pollution controls. The ability of Pseudomonas putida PTCC 1694 (bacteria) and Pleurotus ostreatus IRAN 1781C (fungus)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ghasemi, Roohollah, Golbabaei, Farideh, Rezaei, Sasan, Pourmand, Mohammad Reza, Nabizadeh, Ramin, Jafari, Mohammad Javad, masoorian, Ensieh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6960271/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31938898
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13568-019-0941-z
_version_ 1783487758101118976
author Ghasemi, Roohollah
Golbabaei, Farideh
Rezaei, Sasan
Pourmand, Mohammad Reza
Nabizadeh, Ramin
Jafari, Mohammad Javad
masoorian, Ensieh
author_facet Ghasemi, Roohollah
Golbabaei, Farideh
Rezaei, Sasan
Pourmand, Mohammad Reza
Nabizadeh, Ramin
Jafari, Mohammad Javad
masoorian, Ensieh
author_sort Ghasemi, Roohollah
collection PubMed
description With increasing concerns about industrial gas contaminants and the growing demand for durable and sustainable technologies, attentions have been gradually shifted to biological air pollution controls. The ability of Pseudomonas putida PTCC 1694 (bacteria) and Pleurotus ostreatus IRAN 1781C (fungus) to treat contaminated gas stream with toluene and its biological degradation was compared under similar operating conditions. For this purpose, a biofilter on the laboratory scale was designed and constructed and the tests were carried out in two stages. The first stage, bacterial testing, lasted 20 days and the second stage, fungal testing, lasted 16 days. Inlet loading rates (IL) for bacterial and fungal biofilters were 21.62 ± 6.04 and 26.24 ± 7.35 g/m(3) h respectively. In general, fungal biofilter showed a higher elimination capacity (EC) than bacterial biofilter (18.1 ± 6.98 vs 13.7 ± 4.7 g/m(3) h). However, the pressure drop in the fungal biofilter was higher than the bacterial biofilter (1.26 ± 0.3 vs 1 ± 0.3 mm water), which was probably due to the growth of the mycelium. Fungal biofiltration showed a better performance in the removal of toluene from the air stream.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6960271
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69602712020-01-30 A comparison of biofiltration performance based on bacteria and fungi for treating toluene vapors from airflow Ghasemi, Roohollah Golbabaei, Farideh Rezaei, Sasan Pourmand, Mohammad Reza Nabizadeh, Ramin Jafari, Mohammad Javad masoorian, Ensieh AMB Express Original Article With increasing concerns about industrial gas contaminants and the growing demand for durable and sustainable technologies, attentions have been gradually shifted to biological air pollution controls. The ability of Pseudomonas putida PTCC 1694 (bacteria) and Pleurotus ostreatus IRAN 1781C (fungus) to treat contaminated gas stream with toluene and its biological degradation was compared under similar operating conditions. For this purpose, a biofilter on the laboratory scale was designed and constructed and the tests were carried out in two stages. The first stage, bacterial testing, lasted 20 days and the second stage, fungal testing, lasted 16 days. Inlet loading rates (IL) for bacterial and fungal biofilters were 21.62 ± 6.04 and 26.24 ± 7.35 g/m(3) h respectively. In general, fungal biofilter showed a higher elimination capacity (EC) than bacterial biofilter (18.1 ± 6.98 vs 13.7 ± 4.7 g/m(3) h). However, the pressure drop in the fungal biofilter was higher than the bacterial biofilter (1.26 ± 0.3 vs 1 ± 0.3 mm water), which was probably due to the growth of the mycelium. Fungal biofiltration showed a better performance in the removal of toluene from the air stream. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-01-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6960271/ /pubmed/31938898 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13568-019-0941-z Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Article
Ghasemi, Roohollah
Golbabaei, Farideh
Rezaei, Sasan
Pourmand, Mohammad Reza
Nabizadeh, Ramin
Jafari, Mohammad Javad
masoorian, Ensieh
A comparison of biofiltration performance based on bacteria and fungi for treating toluene vapors from airflow
title A comparison of biofiltration performance based on bacteria and fungi for treating toluene vapors from airflow
title_full A comparison of biofiltration performance based on bacteria and fungi for treating toluene vapors from airflow
title_fullStr A comparison of biofiltration performance based on bacteria and fungi for treating toluene vapors from airflow
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of biofiltration performance based on bacteria and fungi for treating toluene vapors from airflow
title_short A comparison of biofiltration performance based on bacteria and fungi for treating toluene vapors from airflow
title_sort comparison of biofiltration performance based on bacteria and fungi for treating toluene vapors from airflow
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6960271/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31938898
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13568-019-0941-z
work_keys_str_mv AT ghasemiroohollah acomparisonofbiofiltrationperformancebasedonbacteriaandfungifortreatingtoluenevaporsfromairflow
AT golbabaeifarideh acomparisonofbiofiltrationperformancebasedonbacteriaandfungifortreatingtoluenevaporsfromairflow
AT rezaeisasan acomparisonofbiofiltrationperformancebasedonbacteriaandfungifortreatingtoluenevaporsfromairflow
AT pourmandmohammadreza acomparisonofbiofiltrationperformancebasedonbacteriaandfungifortreatingtoluenevaporsfromairflow
AT nabizadehramin acomparisonofbiofiltrationperformancebasedonbacteriaandfungifortreatingtoluenevaporsfromairflow
AT jafarimohammadjavad acomparisonofbiofiltrationperformancebasedonbacteriaandfungifortreatingtoluenevaporsfromairflow
AT masoorianensieh acomparisonofbiofiltrationperformancebasedonbacteriaandfungifortreatingtoluenevaporsfromairflow
AT ghasemiroohollah comparisonofbiofiltrationperformancebasedonbacteriaandfungifortreatingtoluenevaporsfromairflow
AT golbabaeifarideh comparisonofbiofiltrationperformancebasedonbacteriaandfungifortreatingtoluenevaporsfromairflow
AT rezaeisasan comparisonofbiofiltrationperformancebasedonbacteriaandfungifortreatingtoluenevaporsfromairflow
AT pourmandmohammadreza comparisonofbiofiltrationperformancebasedonbacteriaandfungifortreatingtoluenevaporsfromairflow
AT nabizadehramin comparisonofbiofiltrationperformancebasedonbacteriaandfungifortreatingtoluenevaporsfromairflow
AT jafarimohammadjavad comparisonofbiofiltrationperformancebasedonbacteriaandfungifortreatingtoluenevaporsfromairflow
AT masoorianensieh comparisonofbiofiltrationperformancebasedonbacteriaandfungifortreatingtoluenevaporsfromairflow