Cargando…
Good accuracy of the alpha-defensin lateral flow test for hip periprosthetic joint infection: A pilot study in a retrospective cohort of 52 patients
BACKGROUND: The alpha-defensin lateral flow (ADLF) test is a new diagnostic tool for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Test accuracy for combined cohorts of hip and knee PJI has been reported to be good. AIM: To assess the accuracy of the ADLF test for hip PJI, and to compare three different dia...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6960303/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31966968 http://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v11.i1.36 |
_version_ | 1783487765125529600 |
---|---|
author | Kuiper, Jesse WP Pander, Pieter Vos, Stan J |
author_facet | Kuiper, Jesse WP Pander, Pieter Vos, Stan J |
author_sort | Kuiper, Jesse WP |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The alpha-defensin lateral flow (ADLF) test is a new diagnostic tool for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Test accuracy for combined cohorts of hip and knee PJI has been reported to be good. AIM: To assess the accuracy of the ADLF test for hip PJI, and to compare three different diagnostic criteria for PJI. METHODS: A cohort of 52 patients was identified, with a painful or poorly functioning total hip- or hemi-arthroplasty, that underwent aspiration and a subsequent ADLF test. PJI was diagnosed with Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) criteria, and sensitivity, specificity, overall accuracy, positive predictive value and negative predictive value were calculated. Furthermore, test specifics were compared with the European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS) and 2018 International Consensus Meeting (ICM) criteria for PJI. RESULTS: Using MSIS criteria, sensitivity was 100% (CI: 54%-100%) and specificity was 89% (CI: 76%-96%). Six true positives and 5 false positives were found, including one case of metallosis. Using EBJIS criteria, more PJIs were found (11 vs 6), sensitivity was lower (71%, CI: 42%-92%) and specificity was higher (97%, CI: 86%-100%), with 4 false negatives and one false positive result. Using 2018 ICM criteria, sensitivity was 91% (62%-100%) and specificity 100% (91%-100%). The results in this cohort are comparable to previous studies. CONCLUSION: Overall test accuracy of the ADLF test was good in this cohort, with a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 89%. Using different PJI definition criteria, sensitivity and specificity changed slightly but overall accuracy remained around 90%. Using the ADLF test in metallosis cases can result in false positive results and should be performed with caution. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6960303 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Baishideng Publishing Group Inc |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69603032020-01-22 Good accuracy of the alpha-defensin lateral flow test for hip periprosthetic joint infection: A pilot study in a retrospective cohort of 52 patients Kuiper, Jesse WP Pander, Pieter Vos, Stan J World J Orthop Retrospective Cohort Study BACKGROUND: The alpha-defensin lateral flow (ADLF) test is a new diagnostic tool for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Test accuracy for combined cohorts of hip and knee PJI has been reported to be good. AIM: To assess the accuracy of the ADLF test for hip PJI, and to compare three different diagnostic criteria for PJI. METHODS: A cohort of 52 patients was identified, with a painful or poorly functioning total hip- or hemi-arthroplasty, that underwent aspiration and a subsequent ADLF test. PJI was diagnosed with Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) criteria, and sensitivity, specificity, overall accuracy, positive predictive value and negative predictive value were calculated. Furthermore, test specifics were compared with the European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS) and 2018 International Consensus Meeting (ICM) criteria for PJI. RESULTS: Using MSIS criteria, sensitivity was 100% (CI: 54%-100%) and specificity was 89% (CI: 76%-96%). Six true positives and 5 false positives were found, including one case of metallosis. Using EBJIS criteria, more PJIs were found (11 vs 6), sensitivity was lower (71%, CI: 42%-92%) and specificity was higher (97%, CI: 86%-100%), with 4 false negatives and one false positive result. Using 2018 ICM criteria, sensitivity was 91% (62%-100%) and specificity 100% (91%-100%). The results in this cohort are comparable to previous studies. CONCLUSION: Overall test accuracy of the ADLF test was good in this cohort, with a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 89%. Using different PJI definition criteria, sensitivity and specificity changed slightly but overall accuracy remained around 90%. Using the ADLF test in metallosis cases can result in false positive results and should be performed with caution. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2020-01-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6960303/ /pubmed/31966968 http://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v11.i1.36 Text en ©The Author(s) 2019. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. |
spellingShingle | Retrospective Cohort Study Kuiper, Jesse WP Pander, Pieter Vos, Stan J Good accuracy of the alpha-defensin lateral flow test for hip periprosthetic joint infection: A pilot study in a retrospective cohort of 52 patients |
title | Good accuracy of the alpha-defensin lateral flow test for hip periprosthetic joint infection: A pilot study in a retrospective cohort of 52 patients |
title_full | Good accuracy of the alpha-defensin lateral flow test for hip periprosthetic joint infection: A pilot study in a retrospective cohort of 52 patients |
title_fullStr | Good accuracy of the alpha-defensin lateral flow test for hip periprosthetic joint infection: A pilot study in a retrospective cohort of 52 patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Good accuracy of the alpha-defensin lateral flow test for hip periprosthetic joint infection: A pilot study in a retrospective cohort of 52 patients |
title_short | Good accuracy of the alpha-defensin lateral flow test for hip periprosthetic joint infection: A pilot study in a retrospective cohort of 52 patients |
title_sort | good accuracy of the alpha-defensin lateral flow test for hip periprosthetic joint infection: a pilot study in a retrospective cohort of 52 patients |
topic | Retrospective Cohort Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6960303/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31966968 http://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v11.i1.36 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kuiperjessewp goodaccuracyofthealphadefensinlateralflowtestforhipperiprostheticjointinfectionapilotstudyinaretrospectivecohortof52patients AT panderpieter goodaccuracyofthealphadefensinlateralflowtestforhipperiprostheticjointinfectionapilotstudyinaretrospectivecohortof52patients AT vosstanj goodaccuracyofthealphadefensinlateralflowtestforhipperiprostheticjointinfectionapilotstudyinaretrospectivecohortof52patients |