Cargando…

Good accuracy of the alpha-defensin lateral flow test for hip periprosthetic joint infection: A pilot study in a retrospective cohort of 52 patients

BACKGROUND: The alpha-defensin lateral flow (ADLF) test is a new diagnostic tool for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Test accuracy for combined cohorts of hip and knee PJI has been reported to be good. AIM: To assess the accuracy of the ADLF test for hip PJI, and to compare three different dia...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kuiper, Jesse WP, Pander, Pieter, Vos, Stan J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6960303/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31966968
http://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v11.i1.36
_version_ 1783487765125529600
author Kuiper, Jesse WP
Pander, Pieter
Vos, Stan J
author_facet Kuiper, Jesse WP
Pander, Pieter
Vos, Stan J
author_sort Kuiper, Jesse WP
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The alpha-defensin lateral flow (ADLF) test is a new diagnostic tool for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Test accuracy for combined cohorts of hip and knee PJI has been reported to be good. AIM: To assess the accuracy of the ADLF test for hip PJI, and to compare three different diagnostic criteria for PJI. METHODS: A cohort of 52 patients was identified, with a painful or poorly functioning total hip- or hemi-arthroplasty, that underwent aspiration and a subsequent ADLF test. PJI was diagnosed with Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) criteria, and sensitivity, specificity, overall accuracy, positive predictive value and negative predictive value were calculated. Furthermore, test specifics were compared with the European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS) and 2018 International Consensus Meeting (ICM) criteria for PJI. RESULTS: Using MSIS criteria, sensitivity was 100% (CI: 54%-100%) and specificity was 89% (CI: 76%-96%). Six true positives and 5 false positives were found, including one case of metallosis. Using EBJIS criteria, more PJIs were found (11 vs 6), sensitivity was lower (71%, CI: 42%-92%) and specificity was higher (97%, CI: 86%-100%), with 4 false negatives and one false positive result. Using 2018 ICM criteria, sensitivity was 91% (62%-100%) and specificity 100% (91%-100%). The results in this cohort are comparable to previous studies. CONCLUSION: Overall test accuracy of the ADLF test was good in this cohort, with a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 89%. Using different PJI definition criteria, sensitivity and specificity changed slightly but overall accuracy remained around 90%. Using the ADLF test in metallosis cases can result in false positive results and should be performed with caution.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6960303
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69603032020-01-22 Good accuracy of the alpha-defensin lateral flow test for hip periprosthetic joint infection: A pilot study in a retrospective cohort of 52 patients Kuiper, Jesse WP Pander, Pieter Vos, Stan J World J Orthop Retrospective Cohort Study BACKGROUND: The alpha-defensin lateral flow (ADLF) test is a new diagnostic tool for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Test accuracy for combined cohorts of hip and knee PJI has been reported to be good. AIM: To assess the accuracy of the ADLF test for hip PJI, and to compare three different diagnostic criteria for PJI. METHODS: A cohort of 52 patients was identified, with a painful or poorly functioning total hip- or hemi-arthroplasty, that underwent aspiration and a subsequent ADLF test. PJI was diagnosed with Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) criteria, and sensitivity, specificity, overall accuracy, positive predictive value and negative predictive value were calculated. Furthermore, test specifics were compared with the European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS) and 2018 International Consensus Meeting (ICM) criteria for PJI. RESULTS: Using MSIS criteria, sensitivity was 100% (CI: 54%-100%) and specificity was 89% (CI: 76%-96%). Six true positives and 5 false positives were found, including one case of metallosis. Using EBJIS criteria, more PJIs were found (11 vs 6), sensitivity was lower (71%, CI: 42%-92%) and specificity was higher (97%, CI: 86%-100%), with 4 false negatives and one false positive result. Using 2018 ICM criteria, sensitivity was 91% (62%-100%) and specificity 100% (91%-100%). The results in this cohort are comparable to previous studies. CONCLUSION: Overall test accuracy of the ADLF test was good in this cohort, with a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 89%. Using different PJI definition criteria, sensitivity and specificity changed slightly but overall accuracy remained around 90%. Using the ADLF test in metallosis cases can result in false positive results and should be performed with caution. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2020-01-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6960303/ /pubmed/31966968 http://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v11.i1.36 Text en ©The Author(s) 2019. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial.
spellingShingle Retrospective Cohort Study
Kuiper, Jesse WP
Pander, Pieter
Vos, Stan J
Good accuracy of the alpha-defensin lateral flow test for hip periprosthetic joint infection: A pilot study in a retrospective cohort of 52 patients
title Good accuracy of the alpha-defensin lateral flow test for hip periprosthetic joint infection: A pilot study in a retrospective cohort of 52 patients
title_full Good accuracy of the alpha-defensin lateral flow test for hip periprosthetic joint infection: A pilot study in a retrospective cohort of 52 patients
title_fullStr Good accuracy of the alpha-defensin lateral flow test for hip periprosthetic joint infection: A pilot study in a retrospective cohort of 52 patients
title_full_unstemmed Good accuracy of the alpha-defensin lateral flow test for hip periprosthetic joint infection: A pilot study in a retrospective cohort of 52 patients
title_short Good accuracy of the alpha-defensin lateral flow test for hip periprosthetic joint infection: A pilot study in a retrospective cohort of 52 patients
title_sort good accuracy of the alpha-defensin lateral flow test for hip periprosthetic joint infection: a pilot study in a retrospective cohort of 52 patients
topic Retrospective Cohort Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6960303/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31966968
http://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v11.i1.36
work_keys_str_mv AT kuiperjessewp goodaccuracyofthealphadefensinlateralflowtestforhipperiprostheticjointinfectionapilotstudyinaretrospectivecohortof52patients
AT panderpieter goodaccuracyofthealphadefensinlateralflowtestforhipperiprostheticjointinfectionapilotstudyinaretrospectivecohortof52patients
AT vosstanj goodaccuracyofthealphadefensinlateralflowtestforhipperiprostheticjointinfectionapilotstudyinaretrospectivecohortof52patients