Cargando…

Preservation of Interference Effects in Working Memory After Orbitofrontal Damage

Orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) is implicated in multiple cognitive processes, including inhibitory control, context memory, recency judgment, and choice behavior. Despite an emerging understanding of the role of OFC in memory and executive control, its necessity for core working memory (WM) operations r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Llorens, Anaïs, Funderud, Ingrid, Blenkmann, Alejandro O., Lubell, James, Foldal, Maja, Leske, Sabine, Huster, Rene, Meling, Torstein R., Knight, Robert T., Solbakk, Anne-Kristin, Endestad, Tor
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6960483/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31998097
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2019.00445
_version_ 1783487778282012672
author Llorens, Anaïs
Funderud, Ingrid
Blenkmann, Alejandro O.
Lubell, James
Foldal, Maja
Leske, Sabine
Huster, Rene
Meling, Torstein R.
Knight, Robert T.
Solbakk, Anne-Kristin
Endestad, Tor
author_facet Llorens, Anaïs
Funderud, Ingrid
Blenkmann, Alejandro O.
Lubell, James
Foldal, Maja
Leske, Sabine
Huster, Rene
Meling, Torstein R.
Knight, Robert T.
Solbakk, Anne-Kristin
Endestad, Tor
author_sort Llorens, Anaïs
collection PubMed
description Orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) is implicated in multiple cognitive processes, including inhibitory control, context memory, recency judgment, and choice behavior. Despite an emerging understanding of the role of OFC in memory and executive control, its necessity for core working memory (WM) operations remains undefined. Here, we assessed the impact of OFC damage on interference effects in WM using a Recent Probes task based on the Sternberg item-recognition task (1966). Subjects were asked to memorize a set of letters and then indicate whether a probe letter was presented in a particular set. Four conditions were created according to the forthcoming response (“yes”/“no”) and the recency of the probe (presented in the previous trial set or not). We compared behavioral and electroencephalography (EEG) responses between healthy subjects (n = 14) and patients with bilateral OFC damage (n = 14). Both groups had the same recency pattern of slower reaction time (RT) when the probe was presented in the previous trial but not in the current one, reflecting the proactive interference (PI). The within-group electrophysiological results showed no condition difference during letter encoding and maintenance. In contrast, event-related potentials (ERPs) to probes showed distinct within-group condition effects, and condition by group effects. The response and recency effects for controls occurred within the same time window (300–500 ms after probe onset) and were observed in two distinct spatial groups including right centro-posterior and left frontal electrodes. Both clusters showed ERP differences elicited by the response effect, and one cluster was also sensitive to the recency manipulation. Condition differences for the OFC group involved two different clusters, encompassing only left hemisphere electrodes and occurring during two consecutive time windows (345–463 ms and 565–710 ms). Both clusters were sensitive to the response effect, but no recency effect was found despite the behavioral recency effect. Although the groups had different electrophysiological responses, the maintenance of letters in WM, the evaluation of the context of the probe, and the decision to accept or reject a probed letter were preserved in OFC patients. The results suggest that neural reorganization may contribute to intact recency judgment and response after OFC damage.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6960483
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69604832020-01-29 Preservation of Interference Effects in Working Memory After Orbitofrontal Damage Llorens, Anaïs Funderud, Ingrid Blenkmann, Alejandro O. Lubell, James Foldal, Maja Leske, Sabine Huster, Rene Meling, Torstein R. Knight, Robert T. Solbakk, Anne-Kristin Endestad, Tor Front Hum Neurosci Human Neuroscience Orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) is implicated in multiple cognitive processes, including inhibitory control, context memory, recency judgment, and choice behavior. Despite an emerging understanding of the role of OFC in memory and executive control, its necessity for core working memory (WM) operations remains undefined. Here, we assessed the impact of OFC damage on interference effects in WM using a Recent Probes task based on the Sternberg item-recognition task (1966). Subjects were asked to memorize a set of letters and then indicate whether a probe letter was presented in a particular set. Four conditions were created according to the forthcoming response (“yes”/“no”) and the recency of the probe (presented in the previous trial set or not). We compared behavioral and electroencephalography (EEG) responses between healthy subjects (n = 14) and patients with bilateral OFC damage (n = 14). Both groups had the same recency pattern of slower reaction time (RT) when the probe was presented in the previous trial but not in the current one, reflecting the proactive interference (PI). The within-group electrophysiological results showed no condition difference during letter encoding and maintenance. In contrast, event-related potentials (ERPs) to probes showed distinct within-group condition effects, and condition by group effects. The response and recency effects for controls occurred within the same time window (300–500 ms after probe onset) and were observed in two distinct spatial groups including right centro-posterior and left frontal electrodes. Both clusters showed ERP differences elicited by the response effect, and one cluster was also sensitive to the recency manipulation. Condition differences for the OFC group involved two different clusters, encompassing only left hemisphere electrodes and occurring during two consecutive time windows (345–463 ms and 565–710 ms). Both clusters were sensitive to the response effect, but no recency effect was found despite the behavioral recency effect. Although the groups had different electrophysiological responses, the maintenance of letters in WM, the evaluation of the context of the probe, and the decision to accept or reject a probed letter were preserved in OFC patients. The results suggest that neural reorganization may contribute to intact recency judgment and response after OFC damage. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-01-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6960483/ /pubmed/31998097 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2019.00445 Text en Copyright © 2020 Llorens, Funderud, Blenkmann, Lubell, Foldal, Leske, Huster, Meling, Knight, Solbakk and Endestad. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Human Neuroscience
Llorens, Anaïs
Funderud, Ingrid
Blenkmann, Alejandro O.
Lubell, James
Foldal, Maja
Leske, Sabine
Huster, Rene
Meling, Torstein R.
Knight, Robert T.
Solbakk, Anne-Kristin
Endestad, Tor
Preservation of Interference Effects in Working Memory After Orbitofrontal Damage
title Preservation of Interference Effects in Working Memory After Orbitofrontal Damage
title_full Preservation of Interference Effects in Working Memory After Orbitofrontal Damage
title_fullStr Preservation of Interference Effects in Working Memory After Orbitofrontal Damage
title_full_unstemmed Preservation of Interference Effects in Working Memory After Orbitofrontal Damage
title_short Preservation of Interference Effects in Working Memory After Orbitofrontal Damage
title_sort preservation of interference effects in working memory after orbitofrontal damage
topic Human Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6960483/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31998097
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2019.00445
work_keys_str_mv AT llorensanais preservationofinterferenceeffectsinworkingmemoryafterorbitofrontaldamage
AT funderudingrid preservationofinterferenceeffectsinworkingmemoryafterorbitofrontaldamage
AT blenkmannalejandroo preservationofinterferenceeffectsinworkingmemoryafterorbitofrontaldamage
AT lubelljames preservationofinterferenceeffectsinworkingmemoryafterorbitofrontaldamage
AT foldalmaja preservationofinterferenceeffectsinworkingmemoryafterorbitofrontaldamage
AT leskesabine preservationofinterferenceeffectsinworkingmemoryafterorbitofrontaldamage
AT husterrene preservationofinterferenceeffectsinworkingmemoryafterorbitofrontaldamage
AT melingtorsteinr preservationofinterferenceeffectsinworkingmemoryafterorbitofrontaldamage
AT knightrobertt preservationofinterferenceeffectsinworkingmemoryafterorbitofrontaldamage
AT solbakkannekristin preservationofinterferenceeffectsinworkingmemoryafterorbitofrontaldamage
AT endestadtor preservationofinterferenceeffectsinworkingmemoryafterorbitofrontaldamage