Cargando…

Evaluation of a 10 nm Particle Number Portable Emissions Measurement System (PEMS)

On-board portable emissions measurement systems (PEMS) are part of the type approval, in-service conformity, and market surveillance aspects of the European exhaust emissions regulation. Currently, only solid particles >23 nm are counted, but Europe will introduce a lower limit of 10 nm. In this...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Giechaskiel, Barouch, Mamakos, Athanasios, Woodburn, Joseph, Szczotka, Andrzej, Bielaczyc, Piotr
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6960637/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31847386
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19245531
_version_ 1783487817380265984
author Giechaskiel, Barouch
Mamakos, Athanasios
Woodburn, Joseph
Szczotka, Andrzej
Bielaczyc, Piotr
author_facet Giechaskiel, Barouch
Mamakos, Athanasios
Woodburn, Joseph
Szczotka, Andrzej
Bielaczyc, Piotr
author_sort Giechaskiel, Barouch
collection PubMed
description On-board portable emissions measurement systems (PEMS) are part of the type approval, in-service conformity, and market surveillance aspects of the European exhaust emissions regulation. Currently, only solid particles >23 nm are counted, but Europe will introduce a lower limit of 10 nm. In this study, we evaluated a 10-nm prototype portable system comparing it with laboratory systems measuring diesel, gasoline, and CNG (compressed natural gas) vehicles with emission levels ranging from approximately 2 × 10(10) to 2 × 10(12) #/km. The results showed that the on-board system differed from the laboratory 10-nm system on average for the tested driving cycles by less than approximately 10% at levels below 6 × 10(11) #/km and by approximately 20% for high-emitting vehicles. The observed differences were similar to those observed in the evaluation of portable >23 nm particle counting systems, despite the relatively small size of the emitted particles (with geometric mean diameters <42 nm) and the additional challenges associated with sub-23 nm measurements. The latter included the presence of semivolatile sub-23 nm particles, the elevated concentration levels during cold start, and also the formation of sub-23 nm artefacts from the elastomers that are used to connect the tailpipe to the measurement devices. The main conclusion of the study is that >10 nm on-board systems can be ready for introduction in future regulations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6960637
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69606372020-01-23 Evaluation of a 10 nm Particle Number Portable Emissions Measurement System (PEMS) Giechaskiel, Barouch Mamakos, Athanasios Woodburn, Joseph Szczotka, Andrzej Bielaczyc, Piotr Sensors (Basel) Article On-board portable emissions measurement systems (PEMS) are part of the type approval, in-service conformity, and market surveillance aspects of the European exhaust emissions regulation. Currently, only solid particles >23 nm are counted, but Europe will introduce a lower limit of 10 nm. In this study, we evaluated a 10-nm prototype portable system comparing it with laboratory systems measuring diesel, gasoline, and CNG (compressed natural gas) vehicles with emission levels ranging from approximately 2 × 10(10) to 2 × 10(12) #/km. The results showed that the on-board system differed from the laboratory 10-nm system on average for the tested driving cycles by less than approximately 10% at levels below 6 × 10(11) #/km and by approximately 20% for high-emitting vehicles. The observed differences were similar to those observed in the evaluation of portable >23 nm particle counting systems, despite the relatively small size of the emitted particles (with geometric mean diameters <42 nm) and the additional challenges associated with sub-23 nm measurements. The latter included the presence of semivolatile sub-23 nm particles, the elevated concentration levels during cold start, and also the formation of sub-23 nm artefacts from the elastomers that are used to connect the tailpipe to the measurement devices. The main conclusion of the study is that >10 nm on-board systems can be ready for introduction in future regulations. MDPI 2019-12-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6960637/ /pubmed/31847386 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19245531 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Giechaskiel, Barouch
Mamakos, Athanasios
Woodburn, Joseph
Szczotka, Andrzej
Bielaczyc, Piotr
Evaluation of a 10 nm Particle Number Portable Emissions Measurement System (PEMS)
title Evaluation of a 10 nm Particle Number Portable Emissions Measurement System (PEMS)
title_full Evaluation of a 10 nm Particle Number Portable Emissions Measurement System (PEMS)
title_fullStr Evaluation of a 10 nm Particle Number Portable Emissions Measurement System (PEMS)
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of a 10 nm Particle Number Portable Emissions Measurement System (PEMS)
title_short Evaluation of a 10 nm Particle Number Portable Emissions Measurement System (PEMS)
title_sort evaluation of a 10 nm particle number portable emissions measurement system (pems)
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6960637/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31847386
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19245531
work_keys_str_mv AT giechaskielbarouch evaluationofa10nmparticlenumberportableemissionsmeasurementsystempems
AT mamakosathanasios evaluationofa10nmparticlenumberportableemissionsmeasurementsystempems
AT woodburnjoseph evaluationofa10nmparticlenumberportableemissionsmeasurementsystempems
AT szczotkaandrzej evaluationofa10nmparticlenumberportableemissionsmeasurementsystempems
AT bielaczycpiotr evaluationofa10nmparticlenumberportableemissionsmeasurementsystempems