Cargando…
Evaluation of a 10 nm Particle Number Portable Emissions Measurement System (PEMS)
On-board portable emissions measurement systems (PEMS) are part of the type approval, in-service conformity, and market surveillance aspects of the European exhaust emissions regulation. Currently, only solid particles >23 nm are counted, but Europe will introduce a lower limit of 10 nm. In this...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6960637/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31847386 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19245531 |
_version_ | 1783487817380265984 |
---|---|
author | Giechaskiel, Barouch Mamakos, Athanasios Woodburn, Joseph Szczotka, Andrzej Bielaczyc, Piotr |
author_facet | Giechaskiel, Barouch Mamakos, Athanasios Woodburn, Joseph Szczotka, Andrzej Bielaczyc, Piotr |
author_sort | Giechaskiel, Barouch |
collection | PubMed |
description | On-board portable emissions measurement systems (PEMS) are part of the type approval, in-service conformity, and market surveillance aspects of the European exhaust emissions regulation. Currently, only solid particles >23 nm are counted, but Europe will introduce a lower limit of 10 nm. In this study, we evaluated a 10-nm prototype portable system comparing it with laboratory systems measuring diesel, gasoline, and CNG (compressed natural gas) vehicles with emission levels ranging from approximately 2 × 10(10) to 2 × 10(12) #/km. The results showed that the on-board system differed from the laboratory 10-nm system on average for the tested driving cycles by less than approximately 10% at levels below 6 × 10(11) #/km and by approximately 20% for high-emitting vehicles. The observed differences were similar to those observed in the evaluation of portable >23 nm particle counting systems, despite the relatively small size of the emitted particles (with geometric mean diameters <42 nm) and the additional challenges associated with sub-23 nm measurements. The latter included the presence of semivolatile sub-23 nm particles, the elevated concentration levels during cold start, and also the formation of sub-23 nm artefacts from the elastomers that are used to connect the tailpipe to the measurement devices. The main conclusion of the study is that >10 nm on-board systems can be ready for introduction in future regulations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6960637 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69606372020-01-23 Evaluation of a 10 nm Particle Number Portable Emissions Measurement System (PEMS) Giechaskiel, Barouch Mamakos, Athanasios Woodburn, Joseph Szczotka, Andrzej Bielaczyc, Piotr Sensors (Basel) Article On-board portable emissions measurement systems (PEMS) are part of the type approval, in-service conformity, and market surveillance aspects of the European exhaust emissions regulation. Currently, only solid particles >23 nm are counted, but Europe will introduce a lower limit of 10 nm. In this study, we evaluated a 10-nm prototype portable system comparing it with laboratory systems measuring diesel, gasoline, and CNG (compressed natural gas) vehicles with emission levels ranging from approximately 2 × 10(10) to 2 × 10(12) #/km. The results showed that the on-board system differed from the laboratory 10-nm system on average for the tested driving cycles by less than approximately 10% at levels below 6 × 10(11) #/km and by approximately 20% for high-emitting vehicles. The observed differences were similar to those observed in the evaluation of portable >23 nm particle counting systems, despite the relatively small size of the emitted particles (with geometric mean diameters <42 nm) and the additional challenges associated with sub-23 nm measurements. The latter included the presence of semivolatile sub-23 nm particles, the elevated concentration levels during cold start, and also the formation of sub-23 nm artefacts from the elastomers that are used to connect the tailpipe to the measurement devices. The main conclusion of the study is that >10 nm on-board systems can be ready for introduction in future regulations. MDPI 2019-12-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6960637/ /pubmed/31847386 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19245531 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Giechaskiel, Barouch Mamakos, Athanasios Woodburn, Joseph Szczotka, Andrzej Bielaczyc, Piotr Evaluation of a 10 nm Particle Number Portable Emissions Measurement System (PEMS) |
title | Evaluation of a 10 nm Particle Number Portable Emissions Measurement System (PEMS) |
title_full | Evaluation of a 10 nm Particle Number Portable Emissions Measurement System (PEMS) |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of a 10 nm Particle Number Portable Emissions Measurement System (PEMS) |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of a 10 nm Particle Number Portable Emissions Measurement System (PEMS) |
title_short | Evaluation of a 10 nm Particle Number Portable Emissions Measurement System (PEMS) |
title_sort | evaluation of a 10 nm particle number portable emissions measurement system (pems) |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6960637/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31847386 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19245531 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT giechaskielbarouch evaluationofa10nmparticlenumberportableemissionsmeasurementsystempems AT mamakosathanasios evaluationofa10nmparticlenumberportableemissionsmeasurementsystempems AT woodburnjoseph evaluationofa10nmparticlenumberportableemissionsmeasurementsystempems AT szczotkaandrzej evaluationofa10nmparticlenumberportableemissionsmeasurementsystempems AT bielaczycpiotr evaluationofa10nmparticlenumberportableemissionsmeasurementsystempems |