Cargando…

Self-Organized Proactive Routing Protocol for Non-Uniformly Deployed Underwater Networks

Electromagnetic (EM) waves cannot propagate more than few meters in sea water due to the high absorption rate. Acoustic waves are more suitable for underwater communication, but they travel very slowly compared to EM waves. The typical speed of acoustic waves in water is 1500 m/s, whereas speed of E...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hyder, Waheeduddin, Luque-Nieto, Miguel-Ángel, Poncela, Javier, Otero, Pablo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6960970/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31842438
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19245487
_version_ 1783487892105986048
author Hyder, Waheeduddin
Luque-Nieto, Miguel-Ángel
Poncela, Javier
Otero, Pablo
author_facet Hyder, Waheeduddin
Luque-Nieto, Miguel-Ángel
Poncela, Javier
Otero, Pablo
author_sort Hyder, Waheeduddin
collection PubMed
description Electromagnetic (EM) waves cannot propagate more than few meters in sea water due to the high absorption rate. Acoustic waves are more suitable for underwater communication, but they travel very slowly compared to EM waves. The typical speed of acoustic waves in water is 1500 m/s, whereas speed of EM waves in air is approximately 3 × 10(8) m/s. Therefore, the terrestrial wireless sensor network (WSN) protocols assume that the propagation delay is negligible. Hence, reactive protocols are deemed acceptable for WSNs. Other important issues related to underwater wireless sensor networks (UWSNs) are determining the position of the underwater nodes and keeping a time synchronization among the nodes. Underwater nodes can neither determine their position nor synchronize using Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) because of the short penetration of EM waves in sea water. The limited mobility of UWSN nodes and variation in the propagation speed of acoustic waves make time synchronization a challenging task for underwater acoustic networks (UASNs). For all these reasons, WSN protocols cannot be readily used in UASNs. In this work, a protocol named SPRINT is designed to achieve high data throughput and low energy operation in the nodes. There is a tradeoff between the throughput and the energy consumption in the wireless networks. Longer links mean higher energy consumption. On the other hand, the number of relay nodes or hops between the source node and the final destination node is a key factor which affects the throughput. Each hop increases the delay in the packet forwarding and, as a result, decreases the throughput. Hence, energy consumption requires the nearest nodes to be chosen as forwarding nodes, whereas the throughput requires the farthest node to be selected to minimize the number of hops. SPRINT is a cross-layer, self-organized, proactive protocol which does not require positioning equipment to determine the location of the node. The routing path from the node to the gateway is formed based on the distance. The data sending node prefers to choose the neighbor node which is closest to it. The distance is measured by the signal strength between the two nodes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6960970
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69609702020-01-24 Self-Organized Proactive Routing Protocol for Non-Uniformly Deployed Underwater Networks Hyder, Waheeduddin Luque-Nieto, Miguel-Ángel Poncela, Javier Otero, Pablo Sensors (Basel) Article Electromagnetic (EM) waves cannot propagate more than few meters in sea water due to the high absorption rate. Acoustic waves are more suitable for underwater communication, but they travel very slowly compared to EM waves. The typical speed of acoustic waves in water is 1500 m/s, whereas speed of EM waves in air is approximately 3 × 10(8) m/s. Therefore, the terrestrial wireless sensor network (WSN) protocols assume that the propagation delay is negligible. Hence, reactive protocols are deemed acceptable for WSNs. Other important issues related to underwater wireless sensor networks (UWSNs) are determining the position of the underwater nodes and keeping a time synchronization among the nodes. Underwater nodes can neither determine their position nor synchronize using Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) because of the short penetration of EM waves in sea water. The limited mobility of UWSN nodes and variation in the propagation speed of acoustic waves make time synchronization a challenging task for underwater acoustic networks (UASNs). For all these reasons, WSN protocols cannot be readily used in UASNs. In this work, a protocol named SPRINT is designed to achieve high data throughput and low energy operation in the nodes. There is a tradeoff between the throughput and the energy consumption in the wireless networks. Longer links mean higher energy consumption. On the other hand, the number of relay nodes or hops between the source node and the final destination node is a key factor which affects the throughput. Each hop increases the delay in the packet forwarding and, as a result, decreases the throughput. Hence, energy consumption requires the nearest nodes to be chosen as forwarding nodes, whereas the throughput requires the farthest node to be selected to minimize the number of hops. SPRINT is a cross-layer, self-organized, proactive protocol which does not require positioning equipment to determine the location of the node. The routing path from the node to the gateway is formed based on the distance. The data sending node prefers to choose the neighbor node which is closest to it. The distance is measured by the signal strength between the two nodes. MDPI 2019-12-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6960970/ /pubmed/31842438 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19245487 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Hyder, Waheeduddin
Luque-Nieto, Miguel-Ángel
Poncela, Javier
Otero, Pablo
Self-Organized Proactive Routing Protocol for Non-Uniformly Deployed Underwater Networks
title Self-Organized Proactive Routing Protocol for Non-Uniformly Deployed Underwater Networks
title_full Self-Organized Proactive Routing Protocol for Non-Uniformly Deployed Underwater Networks
title_fullStr Self-Organized Proactive Routing Protocol for Non-Uniformly Deployed Underwater Networks
title_full_unstemmed Self-Organized Proactive Routing Protocol for Non-Uniformly Deployed Underwater Networks
title_short Self-Organized Proactive Routing Protocol for Non-Uniformly Deployed Underwater Networks
title_sort self-organized proactive routing protocol for non-uniformly deployed underwater networks
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6960970/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31842438
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19245487
work_keys_str_mv AT hyderwaheeduddin selforganizedproactiveroutingprotocolfornonuniformlydeployedunderwaternetworks
AT luquenietomiguelangel selforganizedproactiveroutingprotocolfornonuniformlydeployedunderwaternetworks
AT poncelajavier selforganizedproactiveroutingprotocolfornonuniformlydeployedunderwaternetworks
AT oteropablo selforganizedproactiveroutingprotocolfornonuniformlydeployedunderwaternetworks