Cargando…

Evaluation of Pupillary Light Reflex in Amblyopic Eyes Using Dynamic Pupillometry

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the pupillary light reflex responses in patients with unilateral strabismic and anisometropic amblyopia using dynamic pupillometry. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 102 eyes of 51 patients with unilateral amblyopia were included in this cross-sectional study. Of the 51 patie...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bitirgen, Gülfidan, Daraghma, Mohammed, Özkağnıcı, Ahmet
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Galenos Publishing 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6961072/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31893585
http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/tjo.galenos.2019.32748
_version_ 1783487916040781824
author Bitirgen, Gülfidan
Daraghma, Mohammed
Özkağnıcı, Ahmet
author_facet Bitirgen, Gülfidan
Daraghma, Mohammed
Özkağnıcı, Ahmet
author_sort Bitirgen, Gülfidan
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the pupillary light reflex responses in patients with unilateral strabismic and anisometropic amblyopia using dynamic pupillometry. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 102 eyes of 51 patients with unilateral amblyopia were included in this cross-sectional study. Of the 51 patients, 37 (72.5%) had strabismic amblyopia and 14 (27.5%) had anisometropic amblyopia. All patients underwent complete ophthalmological examination, and pupillary light reflex responses were measured using a computerized dynamic pupillometry system (MonPack One; Metrovision, France). Initial pupil diameter; the amplitude, latency, duration, and velocity of pupil contraction; and the latency, duration, and velocity of pupil dilation were recorded. Results obtained from the patients’ amblyopic and normal fellow eyes were compared using paired-samples t-test and Wilcoxon signed rank test. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 11.9±6.0 years. Amblyopic eyes had longer contraction latency (p=0.009), shorter contraction duration (p=0.002), and higher dilation velocity (p=0.033) compared to fellow eyes, while other parameters did not show significant differences. In subgroup analysis, eyes with strabismic amblyopia had longer contraction latency (p=0.006) and shorter contraction duration (p=0.017), while eyes with anisometropic amblyopia had shorter contraction duration (p=0.030) when compared with fellow eyes. CONCLUSION: In this study, the objective records obtained by dynamic pupillometry showed that pupillary light reflex responses are affected in amblyopic eyes. This finding may shed light on unclear aspects of the pathophysiology of amblyopia.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6961072
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Galenos Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69610722020-01-28 Evaluation of Pupillary Light Reflex in Amblyopic Eyes Using Dynamic Pupillometry Bitirgen, Gülfidan Daraghma, Mohammed Özkağnıcı, Ahmet Turk J Ophthalmol Original Article OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the pupillary light reflex responses in patients with unilateral strabismic and anisometropic amblyopia using dynamic pupillometry. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 102 eyes of 51 patients with unilateral amblyopia were included in this cross-sectional study. Of the 51 patients, 37 (72.5%) had strabismic amblyopia and 14 (27.5%) had anisometropic amblyopia. All patients underwent complete ophthalmological examination, and pupillary light reflex responses were measured using a computerized dynamic pupillometry system (MonPack One; Metrovision, France). Initial pupil diameter; the amplitude, latency, duration, and velocity of pupil contraction; and the latency, duration, and velocity of pupil dilation were recorded. Results obtained from the patients’ amblyopic and normal fellow eyes were compared using paired-samples t-test and Wilcoxon signed rank test. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 11.9±6.0 years. Amblyopic eyes had longer contraction latency (p=0.009), shorter contraction duration (p=0.002), and higher dilation velocity (p=0.033) compared to fellow eyes, while other parameters did not show significant differences. In subgroup analysis, eyes with strabismic amblyopia had longer contraction latency (p=0.006) and shorter contraction duration (p=0.017), while eyes with anisometropic amblyopia had shorter contraction duration (p=0.030) when compared with fellow eyes. CONCLUSION: In this study, the objective records obtained by dynamic pupillometry showed that pupillary light reflex responses are affected in amblyopic eyes. This finding may shed light on unclear aspects of the pathophysiology of amblyopia. Galenos Publishing 2019-12 2019-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC6961072/ /pubmed/31893585 http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/tjo.galenos.2019.32748 Text en © Copyright 2019 by Turkish Ophthalmological Association | Turkish Journal of Ophthalmology, published by Galenos Publishing House. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Bitirgen, Gülfidan
Daraghma, Mohammed
Özkağnıcı, Ahmet
Evaluation of Pupillary Light Reflex in Amblyopic Eyes Using Dynamic Pupillometry
title Evaluation of Pupillary Light Reflex in Amblyopic Eyes Using Dynamic Pupillometry
title_full Evaluation of Pupillary Light Reflex in Amblyopic Eyes Using Dynamic Pupillometry
title_fullStr Evaluation of Pupillary Light Reflex in Amblyopic Eyes Using Dynamic Pupillometry
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Pupillary Light Reflex in Amblyopic Eyes Using Dynamic Pupillometry
title_short Evaluation of Pupillary Light Reflex in Amblyopic Eyes Using Dynamic Pupillometry
title_sort evaluation of pupillary light reflex in amblyopic eyes using dynamic pupillometry
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6961072/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31893585
http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/tjo.galenos.2019.32748
work_keys_str_mv AT bitirgengulfidan evaluationofpupillarylightreflexinamblyopiceyesusingdynamicpupillometry
AT daraghmamohammed evaluationofpupillarylightreflexinamblyopiceyesusingdynamicpupillometry
AT ozkagnıcıahmet evaluationofpupillarylightreflexinamblyopiceyesusingdynamicpupillometry