Carrier-microencapsulation of arsenopyrite using Al-catecholate complex: nature of oxidation products, effects on anodic and cathodic reactions, and coating stability under simulated weathering conditions

Mining activities often generate large amounts of sulfide-rich wastes containing arsenopyrite (FeAsS), which when dissolved releases toxic arsenic (As) and generates acid mine drainage (AMD) that are both disastrous to the environment. To suppress arsenopyrite dissolution, a technique that selectively coats sulfide minerals with a protective layer of Al-oxyhydroxide called Al-based carrier-microencapsulation (CME) was developed. Although a previous study of the authors showed that Al-based CME could significantly limit arsenopyrite dissolution, nature of the coating formed on arsenopyrite, including its electrochemical properties, is still not well understood. Moreover, stability of the coating once exposed to weathering conditions remains unclear. Better understanding of these important issues would greatly improve Al-based CME especially in its application to real mine wastes. In this study, nature of the coating formed by Al-based CME was investigated using SEM-EDX, DRIFTS and XPS while the electrochemical properties of the coating were evaluated by cyclic voltammetry and chronoamperometry. Meanwhile, stability of the coating was elucidated using consecutive batch leaching experiments and weathering cell tests. SEM-EDX, DRIFTS and XPS results indicate that the protective coating formed on arsenopyrite by Al-based CME was mainly composed of bayerite (α-Al(OH)(3)), gibbsite (γ-Al(OH)(3)), and boehmite (γ-AlO(OH)). These Al-based coatings, which have insulating properties, made arsenopyrite less electrochemically active. The coatings also limited the extent of both the anodic and cathodic half-cell reactions of arsenopyrite oxidation that suppressed As release and acid generation. Weathering cell tests indicated that the oxidation of CME-treated arsenopyrite was effectively limited until about 15 days but after this, it started to gradually progress with time due to the increasing acidity of the system where Al-based coatings became unstable. Nonetheless, CME-treated arsenopyrite was less oxidized based on the released amounts of Fe, As and S suppressed by 80, 60 and 70%, respectively, compared with the one treated with control.