Cargando…

The cost-effectiveness of specialized nursing interventions for people with Parkinson’s disease: the NICE-PD study protocol for a randomized controlled clinical trial

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines recommend that every person with Parkinson’s disease (PD) should have access to Parkinson’s disease nurse specialist (PDNS) care. However, there is little scientific evidence of the cost-effectiveness of PDNS care. This hampers wider implementation, creates unequal acc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Radder, Danique L. M., Lennaerts, Herma H., Vermeulen, Hester, van Asseldonk, Thies, Delnooz, Cathérine C. S., Hagen, Rob H., Munneke, Marten, Bloem, Bastiaan R., de Vries, Nienke M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6961317/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31941538
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3926-y
_version_ 1783487966670225408
author Radder, Danique L. M.
Lennaerts, Herma H.
Vermeulen, Hester
van Asseldonk, Thies
Delnooz, Cathérine C. S.
Hagen, Rob H.
Munneke, Marten
Bloem, Bastiaan R.
de Vries, Nienke M.
author_facet Radder, Danique L. M.
Lennaerts, Herma H.
Vermeulen, Hester
van Asseldonk, Thies
Delnooz, Cathérine C. S.
Hagen, Rob H.
Munneke, Marten
Bloem, Bastiaan R.
de Vries, Nienke M.
author_sort Radder, Danique L. M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Current guidelines recommend that every person with Parkinson’s disease (PD) should have access to Parkinson’s disease nurse specialist (PDNS) care. However, there is little scientific evidence of the cost-effectiveness of PDNS care. This hampers wider implementation, creates unequal access to care, and possibly leads to avoidable disability and costs. Therefore, we aim to study the (cost-)effectiveness of specialized nursing care provided by a PDNS compared with usual care (without PDNS) for people with PD in all disease stages. To gain more insight into the deployed interventions and their effects, a preplanned subgroup analysis will be performed on the basis of disease duration (diagnosis < 5, 5–10, or > 10 years ago). METHODS: We will perform an 18-month, single-blind, randomized controlled clinical trial in eight community hospitals in the Netherlands. A total of 240 people with PD who have not been treated by a PDNS over the past 2 years will be included, independent of disease severity or duration. In each hospital, 30 patients will randomly be allocated in a 1:1 ratio to receive either care by a PDNS (who works according to a recent guideline on PDNS care) or usual care. We will use two co-primary outcomes: quality of life (measured with the Parkinson’s Disease Questionnaire-39) and motor symptoms (measured with the Movement Disorders Society-sponsored revision of the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale part III). Secondary outcomes include nonmotor symptoms, health-related quality of life, experienced quality of care, self-management, medication adherence, caregiver burden, and coping skills. Data will be collected after 12 months and 18 months by a blinded researcher. A healthcare utilization and productivity loss questionnaire will be completed every 3 months. DISCUSSION: The results of this trial will have an immediate impact on the current care of people with PD. We hypothesize that by offering more patients access to PDNS care, quality of life will increase. We also expect healthcare costs to remain equal because increases in direct medical costs (funding additional nurses) will be offset by a reduced number of consultations with the general practitioner and neurologist. If these outcomes are reached, wide implementation of PDNS care will be warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03830190. Registered February 5, 2019 (retrospectively registered).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6961317
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69613172020-01-17 The cost-effectiveness of specialized nursing interventions for people with Parkinson’s disease: the NICE-PD study protocol for a randomized controlled clinical trial Radder, Danique L. M. Lennaerts, Herma H. Vermeulen, Hester van Asseldonk, Thies Delnooz, Cathérine C. S. Hagen, Rob H. Munneke, Marten Bloem, Bastiaan R. de Vries, Nienke M. Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Current guidelines recommend that every person with Parkinson’s disease (PD) should have access to Parkinson’s disease nurse specialist (PDNS) care. However, there is little scientific evidence of the cost-effectiveness of PDNS care. This hampers wider implementation, creates unequal access to care, and possibly leads to avoidable disability and costs. Therefore, we aim to study the (cost-)effectiveness of specialized nursing care provided by a PDNS compared with usual care (without PDNS) for people with PD in all disease stages. To gain more insight into the deployed interventions and their effects, a preplanned subgroup analysis will be performed on the basis of disease duration (diagnosis < 5, 5–10, or > 10 years ago). METHODS: We will perform an 18-month, single-blind, randomized controlled clinical trial in eight community hospitals in the Netherlands. A total of 240 people with PD who have not been treated by a PDNS over the past 2 years will be included, independent of disease severity or duration. In each hospital, 30 patients will randomly be allocated in a 1:1 ratio to receive either care by a PDNS (who works according to a recent guideline on PDNS care) or usual care. We will use two co-primary outcomes: quality of life (measured with the Parkinson’s Disease Questionnaire-39) and motor symptoms (measured with the Movement Disorders Society-sponsored revision of the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale part III). Secondary outcomes include nonmotor symptoms, health-related quality of life, experienced quality of care, self-management, medication adherence, caregiver burden, and coping skills. Data will be collected after 12 months and 18 months by a blinded researcher. A healthcare utilization and productivity loss questionnaire will be completed every 3 months. DISCUSSION: The results of this trial will have an immediate impact on the current care of people with PD. We hypothesize that by offering more patients access to PDNS care, quality of life will increase. We also expect healthcare costs to remain equal because increases in direct medical costs (funding additional nurses) will be offset by a reduced number of consultations with the general practitioner and neurologist. If these outcomes are reached, wide implementation of PDNS care will be warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03830190. Registered February 5, 2019 (retrospectively registered). BioMed Central 2020-01-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6961317/ /pubmed/31941538 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3926-y Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Radder, Danique L. M.
Lennaerts, Herma H.
Vermeulen, Hester
van Asseldonk, Thies
Delnooz, Cathérine C. S.
Hagen, Rob H.
Munneke, Marten
Bloem, Bastiaan R.
de Vries, Nienke M.
The cost-effectiveness of specialized nursing interventions for people with Parkinson’s disease: the NICE-PD study protocol for a randomized controlled clinical trial
title The cost-effectiveness of specialized nursing interventions for people with Parkinson’s disease: the NICE-PD study protocol for a randomized controlled clinical trial
title_full The cost-effectiveness of specialized nursing interventions for people with Parkinson’s disease: the NICE-PD study protocol for a randomized controlled clinical trial
title_fullStr The cost-effectiveness of specialized nursing interventions for people with Parkinson’s disease: the NICE-PD study protocol for a randomized controlled clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed The cost-effectiveness of specialized nursing interventions for people with Parkinson’s disease: the NICE-PD study protocol for a randomized controlled clinical trial
title_short The cost-effectiveness of specialized nursing interventions for people with Parkinson’s disease: the NICE-PD study protocol for a randomized controlled clinical trial
title_sort cost-effectiveness of specialized nursing interventions for people with parkinson’s disease: the nice-pd study protocol for a randomized controlled clinical trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6961317/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31941538
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3926-y
work_keys_str_mv AT radderdaniquelm thecosteffectivenessofspecializednursinginterventionsforpeoplewithparkinsonsdiseasethenicepdstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial
AT lennaertshermah thecosteffectivenessofspecializednursinginterventionsforpeoplewithparkinsonsdiseasethenicepdstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial
AT vermeulenhester thecosteffectivenessofspecializednursinginterventionsforpeoplewithparkinsonsdiseasethenicepdstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial
AT vanasseldonkthies thecosteffectivenessofspecializednursinginterventionsforpeoplewithparkinsonsdiseasethenicepdstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial
AT delnoozcatherinecs thecosteffectivenessofspecializednursinginterventionsforpeoplewithparkinsonsdiseasethenicepdstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial
AT hagenrobh thecosteffectivenessofspecializednursinginterventionsforpeoplewithparkinsonsdiseasethenicepdstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial
AT munnekemarten thecosteffectivenessofspecializednursinginterventionsforpeoplewithparkinsonsdiseasethenicepdstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial
AT bloembastiaanr thecosteffectivenessofspecializednursinginterventionsforpeoplewithparkinsonsdiseasethenicepdstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial
AT devriesnienkem thecosteffectivenessofspecializednursinginterventionsforpeoplewithparkinsonsdiseasethenicepdstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial
AT radderdaniquelm costeffectivenessofspecializednursinginterventionsforpeoplewithparkinsonsdiseasethenicepdstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial
AT lennaertshermah costeffectivenessofspecializednursinginterventionsforpeoplewithparkinsonsdiseasethenicepdstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial
AT vermeulenhester costeffectivenessofspecializednursinginterventionsforpeoplewithparkinsonsdiseasethenicepdstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial
AT vanasseldonkthies costeffectivenessofspecializednursinginterventionsforpeoplewithparkinsonsdiseasethenicepdstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial
AT delnoozcatherinecs costeffectivenessofspecializednursinginterventionsforpeoplewithparkinsonsdiseasethenicepdstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial
AT hagenrobh costeffectivenessofspecializednursinginterventionsforpeoplewithparkinsonsdiseasethenicepdstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial
AT munnekemarten costeffectivenessofspecializednursinginterventionsforpeoplewithparkinsonsdiseasethenicepdstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial
AT bloembastiaanr costeffectivenessofspecializednursinginterventionsforpeoplewithparkinsonsdiseasethenicepdstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial
AT devriesnienkem costeffectivenessofspecializednursinginterventionsforpeoplewithparkinsonsdiseasethenicepdstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial