Cargando…

Double-chamber syringe versus classic syringes for peripheral intravenous drug administration and catheter flushing: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND: The prevention of catheter-related complications is nowadays an important topic of research. Flushing catheters is considered an important clinical procedure in preventing malfunction and several complications such as phlebitis or infection. Considering the latest guidelines of the Infus...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Parreira, Pedro, Sousa, Liliana B., Marques, Inês A., Santos-Costa, Paulo, Braga, Luciene M., Cruz, Arménio, Salgueiro-Oliveira, Anabela
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6961373/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31937342
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3887-1
_version_ 1783487978939613184
author Parreira, Pedro
Sousa, Liliana B.
Marques, Inês A.
Santos-Costa, Paulo
Braga, Luciene M.
Cruz, Arménio
Salgueiro-Oliveira, Anabela
author_facet Parreira, Pedro
Sousa, Liliana B.
Marques, Inês A.
Santos-Costa, Paulo
Braga, Luciene M.
Cruz, Arménio
Salgueiro-Oliveira, Anabela
author_sort Parreira, Pedro
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The prevention of catheter-related complications is nowadays an important topic of research. Flushing catheters is considered an important clinical procedure in preventing malfunction and several complications such as phlebitis or infection. Considering the latest guidelines of the Infusion Nurses Society, the flushing should be carried out both pre- and post-drug administration, requiring different syringes (with associated overall increased times of preparation/administration of intravenous medication by nurses, and also increasing the need for manipulation of the venous catheter). METHODS/DESIGN: A multi-centre, two-arm randomised controlled trial with partially blinded outcome assessment of 146 adult patients. After eligibility analysis and informed consent, participants will receive usual intravenous administration drugs with flushing procedures, with a double-chamber syringe (arm A) or with classic syringes (arm B). The outcomes assessment will be performed on a daily basis by an unblinded ward team, with the same procedures in both groups. Some main outcomes, such as phlebitis and infiltration, will also be evaluated by nurses from a blinded research team and registered once a day. DISCUSSION: The study outlined in this protocol will provide valuable insight regarding the effectiveness and safety of this new medical device. The development of this medical device (dual-chamber syringe, for drug and flush solution) seems to be an important step to facilitate nurses’ adoption of good clinical practices in intravenous procedures, reducing catheter manipulations. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04046770. Registered 13 August 2019.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6961373
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69613732020-01-17 Double-chamber syringe versus classic syringes for peripheral intravenous drug administration and catheter flushing: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial Parreira, Pedro Sousa, Liliana B. Marques, Inês A. Santos-Costa, Paulo Braga, Luciene M. Cruz, Arménio Salgueiro-Oliveira, Anabela Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: The prevention of catheter-related complications is nowadays an important topic of research. Flushing catheters is considered an important clinical procedure in preventing malfunction and several complications such as phlebitis or infection. Considering the latest guidelines of the Infusion Nurses Society, the flushing should be carried out both pre- and post-drug administration, requiring different syringes (with associated overall increased times of preparation/administration of intravenous medication by nurses, and also increasing the need for manipulation of the venous catheter). METHODS/DESIGN: A multi-centre, two-arm randomised controlled trial with partially blinded outcome assessment of 146 adult patients. After eligibility analysis and informed consent, participants will receive usual intravenous administration drugs with flushing procedures, with a double-chamber syringe (arm A) or with classic syringes (arm B). The outcomes assessment will be performed on a daily basis by an unblinded ward team, with the same procedures in both groups. Some main outcomes, such as phlebitis and infiltration, will also be evaluated by nurses from a blinded research team and registered once a day. DISCUSSION: The study outlined in this protocol will provide valuable insight regarding the effectiveness and safety of this new medical device. The development of this medical device (dual-chamber syringe, for drug and flush solution) seems to be an important step to facilitate nurses’ adoption of good clinical practices in intravenous procedures, reducing catheter manipulations. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04046770. Registered 13 August 2019. BioMed Central 2020-01-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6961373/ /pubmed/31937342 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3887-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Parreira, Pedro
Sousa, Liliana B.
Marques, Inês A.
Santos-Costa, Paulo
Braga, Luciene M.
Cruz, Arménio
Salgueiro-Oliveira, Anabela
Double-chamber syringe versus classic syringes for peripheral intravenous drug administration and catheter flushing: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title Double-chamber syringe versus classic syringes for peripheral intravenous drug administration and catheter flushing: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_full Double-chamber syringe versus classic syringes for peripheral intravenous drug administration and catheter flushing: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Double-chamber syringe versus classic syringes for peripheral intravenous drug administration and catheter flushing: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Double-chamber syringe versus classic syringes for peripheral intravenous drug administration and catheter flushing: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_short Double-chamber syringe versus classic syringes for peripheral intravenous drug administration and catheter flushing: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_sort double-chamber syringe versus classic syringes for peripheral intravenous drug administration and catheter flushing: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6961373/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31937342
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3887-1
work_keys_str_mv AT parreirapedro doublechambersyringeversusclassicsyringesforperipheralintravenousdrugadministrationandcatheterflushingastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT sousalilianab doublechambersyringeversusclassicsyringesforperipheralintravenousdrugadministrationandcatheterflushingastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT marquesinesa doublechambersyringeversusclassicsyringesforperipheralintravenousdrugadministrationandcatheterflushingastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT santoscostapaulo doublechambersyringeversusclassicsyringesforperipheralintravenousdrugadministrationandcatheterflushingastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT bragalucienem doublechambersyringeversusclassicsyringesforperipheralintravenousdrugadministrationandcatheterflushingastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT cruzarmenio doublechambersyringeversusclassicsyringesforperipheralintravenousdrugadministrationandcatheterflushingastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT salgueirooliveiraanabela doublechambersyringeversusclassicsyringesforperipheralintravenousdrugadministrationandcatheterflushingastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial