Cargando…
Double-chamber syringe versus classic syringes for peripheral intravenous drug administration and catheter flushing: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
BACKGROUND: The prevention of catheter-related complications is nowadays an important topic of research. Flushing catheters is considered an important clinical procedure in preventing malfunction and several complications such as phlebitis or infection. Considering the latest guidelines of the Infus...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6961373/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31937342 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3887-1 |
_version_ | 1783487978939613184 |
---|---|
author | Parreira, Pedro Sousa, Liliana B. Marques, Inês A. Santos-Costa, Paulo Braga, Luciene M. Cruz, Arménio Salgueiro-Oliveira, Anabela |
author_facet | Parreira, Pedro Sousa, Liliana B. Marques, Inês A. Santos-Costa, Paulo Braga, Luciene M. Cruz, Arménio Salgueiro-Oliveira, Anabela |
author_sort | Parreira, Pedro |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The prevention of catheter-related complications is nowadays an important topic of research. Flushing catheters is considered an important clinical procedure in preventing malfunction and several complications such as phlebitis or infection. Considering the latest guidelines of the Infusion Nurses Society, the flushing should be carried out both pre- and post-drug administration, requiring different syringes (with associated overall increased times of preparation/administration of intravenous medication by nurses, and also increasing the need for manipulation of the venous catheter). METHODS/DESIGN: A multi-centre, two-arm randomised controlled trial with partially blinded outcome assessment of 146 adult patients. After eligibility analysis and informed consent, participants will receive usual intravenous administration drugs with flushing procedures, with a double-chamber syringe (arm A) or with classic syringes (arm B). The outcomes assessment will be performed on a daily basis by an unblinded ward team, with the same procedures in both groups. Some main outcomes, such as phlebitis and infiltration, will also be evaluated by nurses from a blinded research team and registered once a day. DISCUSSION: The study outlined in this protocol will provide valuable insight regarding the effectiveness and safety of this new medical device. The development of this medical device (dual-chamber syringe, for drug and flush solution) seems to be an important step to facilitate nurses’ adoption of good clinical practices in intravenous procedures, reducing catheter manipulations. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04046770. Registered 13 August 2019. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6961373 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69613732020-01-17 Double-chamber syringe versus classic syringes for peripheral intravenous drug administration and catheter flushing: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial Parreira, Pedro Sousa, Liliana B. Marques, Inês A. Santos-Costa, Paulo Braga, Luciene M. Cruz, Arménio Salgueiro-Oliveira, Anabela Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: The prevention of catheter-related complications is nowadays an important topic of research. Flushing catheters is considered an important clinical procedure in preventing malfunction and several complications such as phlebitis or infection. Considering the latest guidelines of the Infusion Nurses Society, the flushing should be carried out both pre- and post-drug administration, requiring different syringes (with associated overall increased times of preparation/administration of intravenous medication by nurses, and also increasing the need for manipulation of the venous catheter). METHODS/DESIGN: A multi-centre, two-arm randomised controlled trial with partially blinded outcome assessment of 146 adult patients. After eligibility analysis and informed consent, participants will receive usual intravenous administration drugs with flushing procedures, with a double-chamber syringe (arm A) or with classic syringes (arm B). The outcomes assessment will be performed on a daily basis by an unblinded ward team, with the same procedures in both groups. Some main outcomes, such as phlebitis and infiltration, will also be evaluated by nurses from a blinded research team and registered once a day. DISCUSSION: The study outlined in this protocol will provide valuable insight regarding the effectiveness and safety of this new medical device. The development of this medical device (dual-chamber syringe, for drug and flush solution) seems to be an important step to facilitate nurses’ adoption of good clinical practices in intravenous procedures, reducing catheter manipulations. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04046770. Registered 13 August 2019. BioMed Central 2020-01-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6961373/ /pubmed/31937342 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3887-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Parreira, Pedro Sousa, Liliana B. Marques, Inês A. Santos-Costa, Paulo Braga, Luciene M. Cruz, Arménio Salgueiro-Oliveira, Anabela Double-chamber syringe versus classic syringes for peripheral intravenous drug administration and catheter flushing: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title | Double-chamber syringe versus classic syringes for peripheral intravenous drug administration and catheter flushing: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title_full | Double-chamber syringe versus classic syringes for peripheral intravenous drug administration and catheter flushing: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Double-chamber syringe versus classic syringes for peripheral intravenous drug administration and catheter flushing: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Double-chamber syringe versus classic syringes for peripheral intravenous drug administration and catheter flushing: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title_short | Double-chamber syringe versus classic syringes for peripheral intravenous drug administration and catheter flushing: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title_sort | double-chamber syringe versus classic syringes for peripheral intravenous drug administration and catheter flushing: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6961373/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31937342 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3887-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT parreirapedro doublechambersyringeversusclassicsyringesforperipheralintravenousdrugadministrationandcatheterflushingastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT sousalilianab doublechambersyringeversusclassicsyringesforperipheralintravenousdrugadministrationandcatheterflushingastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT marquesinesa doublechambersyringeversusclassicsyringesforperipheralintravenousdrugadministrationandcatheterflushingastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT santoscostapaulo doublechambersyringeversusclassicsyringesforperipheralintravenousdrugadministrationandcatheterflushingastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT bragalucienem doublechambersyringeversusclassicsyringesforperipheralintravenousdrugadministrationandcatheterflushingastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT cruzarmenio doublechambersyringeversusclassicsyringesforperipheralintravenousdrugadministrationandcatheterflushingastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT salgueirooliveiraanabela doublechambersyringeversusclassicsyringesforperipheralintravenousdrugadministrationandcatheterflushingastudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial |