Cargando…

Clinical evaluation of percutaneous and intra-operative device closure of atrial septal defects under transesophageal echocardiographic guidance: one center experience and mid-term follow-up

OBJECTIVE: The percutaneous closure of a single secundum atrial septal defect (ASD) under transesophageal echocardiography guidance as an accepted alternative to the transcatheter closure with fluoroscopy has been proven. However, the technique has not been routinely used. This study was to present...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhu, Peng, Qiang, Haifeng, Liu, Fei, Xie, Peng, Zheng, Shaoyi, Sun, Yong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6961376/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31937330
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13019-020-1071-z
_version_ 1783487979645304832
author Zhu, Peng
Qiang, Haifeng
Liu, Fei
Xie, Peng
Zheng, Shaoyi
Sun, Yong
author_facet Zhu, Peng
Qiang, Haifeng
Liu, Fei
Xie, Peng
Zheng, Shaoyi
Sun, Yong
author_sort Zhu, Peng
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The percutaneous closure of a single secundum atrial septal defect (ASD) under transesophageal echocardiography guidance as an accepted alternative to the transcatheter closure with fluoroscopy has been proven. However, the technique has not been routinely used. This study was to present and share our experience in comparing the clinical outcomes of the percutaneous and intra-operative device closure (IODC) of atrial septal defects without fluoroscopy. METHODS: From January 2013 to December 2016, 103 patients with maximum diameters of ASD of less than 30 mm were allocated to groups taking either the percutaneous closure of atrial septal defects approach (PASD group, n = 53) or the intra-operative device closure approach (IODC Group, n = 50). They were operated on using the minimally invasive Amplatzer duct occluder under the guidance of transesophageal echocardiography without cardiopulmonary bypass. Echocardiography was performed to obtain an en face view of the ASD and important surrounding structures before the operation. Patient characteristics, perioperative data, and follow-up data were retrospectively documented and analyzed. RESULTS: Patient characteristics were comparable between the two groups. These were no differences in the maximum diameters of defects and the size of the occluders in each group (16.4 ± 5.3 mm vs16.4 ± 5.2 mm, P = 0.98; 22.4 ± 5.8 mm vs 21.3 ± 6.6 mm, P = 0.38). Intracardiac manipulation time was 20.72 ± 7.70 min in the PASD group and 6.01 ± 1.03 min in the IODC group (P < 0.001). The procedure time was 28.70 ± 10.41 min in the PASD group and 39.13 ± 6.03 min in the IODC group (P < 0.001). The successful closure defect was 100% in both groups when the maximum diameter of defect less than 25 mm. Four patients the PASD groups with maximum diameters between 25 mm and 30 mm were transferred to the IOCD group after unsuccessful device implantations. The total occlusion rate was 82% immediately after deployment, 98% at 3 months, and 100% at 6 months. No cardiac-related complications occurred during the follow-up period of between 3 to 65 months (mean 21.4 ± 9.8 months). CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous device closures of Secundum atrial septal defects showed safety and high efficiency in patients under guidance by transesophageal echocardiography when compared with intra-operative device closures and are especially suited for women and children.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6961376
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69613762020-01-17 Clinical evaluation of percutaneous and intra-operative device closure of atrial septal defects under transesophageal echocardiographic guidance: one center experience and mid-term follow-up Zhu, Peng Qiang, Haifeng Liu, Fei Xie, Peng Zheng, Shaoyi Sun, Yong J Cardiothorac Surg Research Article OBJECTIVE: The percutaneous closure of a single secundum atrial septal defect (ASD) under transesophageal echocardiography guidance as an accepted alternative to the transcatheter closure with fluoroscopy has been proven. However, the technique has not been routinely used. This study was to present and share our experience in comparing the clinical outcomes of the percutaneous and intra-operative device closure (IODC) of atrial septal defects without fluoroscopy. METHODS: From January 2013 to December 2016, 103 patients with maximum diameters of ASD of less than 30 mm were allocated to groups taking either the percutaneous closure of atrial septal defects approach (PASD group, n = 53) or the intra-operative device closure approach (IODC Group, n = 50). They were operated on using the minimally invasive Amplatzer duct occluder under the guidance of transesophageal echocardiography without cardiopulmonary bypass. Echocardiography was performed to obtain an en face view of the ASD and important surrounding structures before the operation. Patient characteristics, perioperative data, and follow-up data were retrospectively documented and analyzed. RESULTS: Patient characteristics were comparable between the two groups. These were no differences in the maximum diameters of defects and the size of the occluders in each group (16.4 ± 5.3 mm vs16.4 ± 5.2 mm, P = 0.98; 22.4 ± 5.8 mm vs 21.3 ± 6.6 mm, P = 0.38). Intracardiac manipulation time was 20.72 ± 7.70 min in the PASD group and 6.01 ± 1.03 min in the IODC group (P < 0.001). The procedure time was 28.70 ± 10.41 min in the PASD group and 39.13 ± 6.03 min in the IODC group (P < 0.001). The successful closure defect was 100% in both groups when the maximum diameter of defect less than 25 mm. Four patients the PASD groups with maximum diameters between 25 mm and 30 mm were transferred to the IOCD group after unsuccessful device implantations. The total occlusion rate was 82% immediately after deployment, 98% at 3 months, and 100% at 6 months. No cardiac-related complications occurred during the follow-up period of between 3 to 65 months (mean 21.4 ± 9.8 months). CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous device closures of Secundum atrial septal defects showed safety and high efficiency in patients under guidance by transesophageal echocardiography when compared with intra-operative device closures and are especially suited for women and children. BioMed Central 2020-01-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6961376/ /pubmed/31937330 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13019-020-1071-z Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Zhu, Peng
Qiang, Haifeng
Liu, Fei
Xie, Peng
Zheng, Shaoyi
Sun, Yong
Clinical evaluation of percutaneous and intra-operative device closure of atrial septal defects under transesophageal echocardiographic guidance: one center experience and mid-term follow-up
title Clinical evaluation of percutaneous and intra-operative device closure of atrial septal defects under transesophageal echocardiographic guidance: one center experience and mid-term follow-up
title_full Clinical evaluation of percutaneous and intra-operative device closure of atrial septal defects under transesophageal echocardiographic guidance: one center experience and mid-term follow-up
title_fullStr Clinical evaluation of percutaneous and intra-operative device closure of atrial septal defects under transesophageal echocardiographic guidance: one center experience and mid-term follow-up
title_full_unstemmed Clinical evaluation of percutaneous and intra-operative device closure of atrial septal defects under transesophageal echocardiographic guidance: one center experience and mid-term follow-up
title_short Clinical evaluation of percutaneous and intra-operative device closure of atrial septal defects under transesophageal echocardiographic guidance: one center experience and mid-term follow-up
title_sort clinical evaluation of percutaneous and intra-operative device closure of atrial septal defects under transesophageal echocardiographic guidance: one center experience and mid-term follow-up
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6961376/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31937330
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13019-020-1071-z
work_keys_str_mv AT zhupeng clinicalevaluationofpercutaneousandintraoperativedeviceclosureofatrialseptaldefectsundertransesophagealechocardiographicguidanceonecenterexperienceandmidtermfollowup
AT qianghaifeng clinicalevaluationofpercutaneousandintraoperativedeviceclosureofatrialseptaldefectsundertransesophagealechocardiographicguidanceonecenterexperienceandmidtermfollowup
AT liufei clinicalevaluationofpercutaneousandintraoperativedeviceclosureofatrialseptaldefectsundertransesophagealechocardiographicguidanceonecenterexperienceandmidtermfollowup
AT xiepeng clinicalevaluationofpercutaneousandintraoperativedeviceclosureofatrialseptaldefectsundertransesophagealechocardiographicguidanceonecenterexperienceandmidtermfollowup
AT zhengshaoyi clinicalevaluationofpercutaneousandintraoperativedeviceclosureofatrialseptaldefectsundertransesophagealechocardiographicguidanceonecenterexperienceandmidtermfollowup
AT sunyong clinicalevaluationofpercutaneousandintraoperativedeviceclosureofatrialseptaldefectsundertransesophagealechocardiographicguidanceonecenterexperienceandmidtermfollowup