Cargando…
Management of clinically node-negative groin in patients with penile cancer
Malignant penile neoplasms are commonly squamous etiology, with the inguinal nodes being the first echelon of spread. The disease spreads to the pelvic lymph nodes only after metastases to the groin nodes, and this is the most important prognostic factor in penile carcinoma. While treatment of penil...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6961429/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31983820 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/iju.IJU_221_19 |
_version_ | 1783487991621091328 |
---|---|
author | Niyogi, Devayani Noronha, Jarin Pal, Mahendra Bakshi, Ganesh Prakash, Gagan |
author_facet | Niyogi, Devayani Noronha, Jarin Pal, Mahendra Bakshi, Ganesh Prakash, Gagan |
author_sort | Niyogi, Devayani |
collection | PubMed |
description | Malignant penile neoplasms are commonly squamous etiology, with the inguinal nodes being the first echelon of spread. The disease spreads to the pelvic lymph nodes only after metastases to the groin nodes, and this is the most important prognostic factor in penile carcinoma. While treatment of penile carcinoma with proven metastases to the inguinal lymph nodes mandates ilioinguinal lymph node dissection, the treatment of patients with impalpable nodes is more controversial. Overtreatment leads to excessive treatment-related morbidity in these patients, while a wait-and-see policy runs the risk of patients presenting with inguinal and distant metastases, which would have been curable at presentation. Unfortunately, no single imaging modality has been proved to be convincingly superior in the staging, and hence, management of the clinically negative groin has been subject to debate. While some high volume centers have promoted the use of dynamic sentinel lymph node biopsy, others advocate the use of the modified inguinal lymph node template to stage the groin adequately. Newer techniques such as video endoscopic inguinal lymph node dissection have been introduced as an alternative to the original radical inguinal lymphadenectomy to reduce morbidity. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6961429 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69614292020-01-24 Management of clinically node-negative groin in patients with penile cancer Niyogi, Devayani Noronha, Jarin Pal, Mahendra Bakshi, Ganesh Prakash, Gagan Indian J Urol Review Article Malignant penile neoplasms are commonly squamous etiology, with the inguinal nodes being the first echelon of spread. The disease spreads to the pelvic lymph nodes only after metastases to the groin nodes, and this is the most important prognostic factor in penile carcinoma. While treatment of penile carcinoma with proven metastases to the inguinal lymph nodes mandates ilioinguinal lymph node dissection, the treatment of patients with impalpable nodes is more controversial. Overtreatment leads to excessive treatment-related morbidity in these patients, while a wait-and-see policy runs the risk of patients presenting with inguinal and distant metastases, which would have been curable at presentation. Unfortunately, no single imaging modality has been proved to be convincingly superior in the staging, and hence, management of the clinically negative groin has been subject to debate. While some high volume centers have promoted the use of dynamic sentinel lymph node biopsy, others advocate the use of the modified inguinal lymph node template to stage the groin adequately. Newer techniques such as video endoscopic inguinal lymph node dissection have been introduced as an alternative to the original radical inguinal lymphadenectomy to reduce morbidity. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC6961429/ /pubmed/31983820 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/iju.IJU_221_19 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Indian Journal of Urology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Niyogi, Devayani Noronha, Jarin Pal, Mahendra Bakshi, Ganesh Prakash, Gagan Management of clinically node-negative groin in patients with penile cancer |
title | Management of clinically node-negative groin in patients with penile cancer |
title_full | Management of clinically node-negative groin in patients with penile cancer |
title_fullStr | Management of clinically node-negative groin in patients with penile cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Management of clinically node-negative groin in patients with penile cancer |
title_short | Management of clinically node-negative groin in patients with penile cancer |
title_sort | management of clinically node-negative groin in patients with penile cancer |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6961429/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31983820 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/iju.IJU_221_19 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT niyogidevayani managementofclinicallynodenegativegroininpatientswithpenilecancer AT noronhajarin managementofclinicallynodenegativegroininpatientswithpenilecancer AT palmahendra managementofclinicallynodenegativegroininpatientswithpenilecancer AT bakshiganesh managementofclinicallynodenegativegroininpatientswithpenilecancer AT prakashgagan managementofclinicallynodenegativegroininpatientswithpenilecancer |