Cargando…
Projected costs of single-payer healthcare financing in the United States: A systematic review of economic analyses
BACKGROUND: The United States is the only high-income nation without universal, government-funded or -mandated health insurance employing a unified payment system. The US multi-payer system leaves residents uninsured or underinsured, despite overall healthcare costs far above other nations. Single-p...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6961869/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31940342 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003013 |
_version_ | 1783488060139241472 |
---|---|
author | Cai, Christopher Runte, Jackson Ostrer, Isabel Berry, Kacey Ponce, Ninez Rodriguez, Michael Bertozzi, Stefano White, Justin S. Kahn, James G. |
author_facet | Cai, Christopher Runte, Jackson Ostrer, Isabel Berry, Kacey Ponce, Ninez Rodriguez, Michael Bertozzi, Stefano White, Justin S. Kahn, James G. |
author_sort | Cai, Christopher |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The United States is the only high-income nation without universal, government-funded or -mandated health insurance employing a unified payment system. The US multi-payer system leaves residents uninsured or underinsured, despite overall healthcare costs far above other nations. Single-payer (often referred to as Medicare for All), a proposed policy solution since 1990, is receiving renewed press attention and popular support. Our review seeks to assess the projected cost impact of a single-payer approach. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We conducted our literature search between June 1 and December 31, 2018, without start date restriction for included studies. We surveyed an expert panel and searched PubMed, Google, Google Scholar, and preexisting lists for formal economic studies of the projected costs of single-payer plans for the US or for individual states. Reviewer pairs extracted data on methods and findings using a template. We quantified changes in total costs standardized to percentage of contemporaneous healthcare spending. Additionally, we quantified cost changes by subtype, such as costs due to increased healthcare utilization and savings due to simplified payment administration, lower drug costs, and other factors. We further examined how modeling assumptions affected results. Our search yielded economic analyses of the cost of 22 single-payer plans over the past 30 years. Exclusions were due to inadequate technical data or assuming a substantial ongoing role for private insurers. We found that 19 (86%) of the analyses predicted net savings (median net result was a savings of 3.46% of total costs) in the first year of program operation and 20 (91%) predicted savings over several years; anticipated growth rates would result in long-term net savings for all plans. The largest source of savings was simplified payment administration (median 8.8%), and the best predictors of net savings were the magnitude of utilization increase, and savings on administration and drug costs (R(2) of 0.035, 0.43, and 0.62, respectively). Only drug cost savings remained significant in multivariate analysis. Included studies were heterogeneous in methods, which precluded us from conducting a formal meta-analysis. CONCLUSIONS: In this systematic review, we found a high degree of analytic consensus for the fiscal feasibility of a single-payer approach in the US. Actual costs will depend on plan features and implementation. Future research should refine estimates of the effects of coverage expansion on utilization, evaluate provider administrative costs in varied existing single-payer systems, analyze implementation options, and evaluate US-based single-payer programs, as available. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6961869 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69618692020-01-26 Projected costs of single-payer healthcare financing in the United States: A systematic review of economic analyses Cai, Christopher Runte, Jackson Ostrer, Isabel Berry, Kacey Ponce, Ninez Rodriguez, Michael Bertozzi, Stefano White, Justin S. Kahn, James G. PLoS Med Research Article BACKGROUND: The United States is the only high-income nation without universal, government-funded or -mandated health insurance employing a unified payment system. The US multi-payer system leaves residents uninsured or underinsured, despite overall healthcare costs far above other nations. Single-payer (often referred to as Medicare for All), a proposed policy solution since 1990, is receiving renewed press attention and popular support. Our review seeks to assess the projected cost impact of a single-payer approach. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We conducted our literature search between June 1 and December 31, 2018, without start date restriction for included studies. We surveyed an expert panel and searched PubMed, Google, Google Scholar, and preexisting lists for formal economic studies of the projected costs of single-payer plans for the US or for individual states. Reviewer pairs extracted data on methods and findings using a template. We quantified changes in total costs standardized to percentage of contemporaneous healthcare spending. Additionally, we quantified cost changes by subtype, such as costs due to increased healthcare utilization and savings due to simplified payment administration, lower drug costs, and other factors. We further examined how modeling assumptions affected results. Our search yielded economic analyses of the cost of 22 single-payer plans over the past 30 years. Exclusions were due to inadequate technical data or assuming a substantial ongoing role for private insurers. We found that 19 (86%) of the analyses predicted net savings (median net result was a savings of 3.46% of total costs) in the first year of program operation and 20 (91%) predicted savings over several years; anticipated growth rates would result in long-term net savings for all plans. The largest source of savings was simplified payment administration (median 8.8%), and the best predictors of net savings were the magnitude of utilization increase, and savings on administration and drug costs (R(2) of 0.035, 0.43, and 0.62, respectively). Only drug cost savings remained significant in multivariate analysis. Included studies were heterogeneous in methods, which precluded us from conducting a formal meta-analysis. CONCLUSIONS: In this systematic review, we found a high degree of analytic consensus for the fiscal feasibility of a single-payer approach in the US. Actual costs will depend on plan features and implementation. Future research should refine estimates of the effects of coverage expansion on utilization, evaluate provider administrative costs in varied existing single-payer systems, analyze implementation options, and evaluate US-based single-payer programs, as available. Public Library of Science 2020-01-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6961869/ /pubmed/31940342 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003013 Text en © 2020 Cai et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Cai, Christopher Runte, Jackson Ostrer, Isabel Berry, Kacey Ponce, Ninez Rodriguez, Michael Bertozzi, Stefano White, Justin S. Kahn, James G. Projected costs of single-payer healthcare financing in the United States: A systematic review of economic analyses |
title | Projected costs of single-payer healthcare financing in the United States: A systematic review of economic analyses |
title_full | Projected costs of single-payer healthcare financing in the United States: A systematic review of economic analyses |
title_fullStr | Projected costs of single-payer healthcare financing in the United States: A systematic review of economic analyses |
title_full_unstemmed | Projected costs of single-payer healthcare financing in the United States: A systematic review of economic analyses |
title_short | Projected costs of single-payer healthcare financing in the United States: A systematic review of economic analyses |
title_sort | projected costs of single-payer healthcare financing in the united states: a systematic review of economic analyses |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6961869/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31940342 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003013 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT caichristopher projectedcostsofsinglepayerhealthcarefinancingintheunitedstatesasystematicreviewofeconomicanalyses AT runtejackson projectedcostsofsinglepayerhealthcarefinancingintheunitedstatesasystematicreviewofeconomicanalyses AT ostrerisabel projectedcostsofsinglepayerhealthcarefinancingintheunitedstatesasystematicreviewofeconomicanalyses AT berrykacey projectedcostsofsinglepayerhealthcarefinancingintheunitedstatesasystematicreviewofeconomicanalyses AT ponceninez projectedcostsofsinglepayerhealthcarefinancingintheunitedstatesasystematicreviewofeconomicanalyses AT rodriguezmichael projectedcostsofsinglepayerhealthcarefinancingintheunitedstatesasystematicreviewofeconomicanalyses AT bertozzistefano projectedcostsofsinglepayerhealthcarefinancingintheunitedstatesasystematicreviewofeconomicanalyses AT whitejustins projectedcostsofsinglepayerhealthcarefinancingintheunitedstatesasystematicreviewofeconomicanalyses AT kahnjamesg projectedcostsofsinglepayerhealthcarefinancingintheunitedstatesasystematicreviewofeconomicanalyses |