Cargando…
Evaluating two decision aids for Australian men supporting informed decisions about prostate cancer screening: A randomised controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Australian clinicians are advised to ‘offer evidence-based decisional support to men considering whether or not to have a PSA test’. This randomised trial compared the performance and acceptability of two new decision aids (DAs) to aid men in making informed choices about PSA screening....
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6961909/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31940376 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227304 |
_version_ | 1783488069476810752 |
---|---|
author | Pickles, Kristen Kazda, Luise Barratt, Alexandra McGeechan, Kevin Hersch, Jolyn McCaffery, Kirsten |
author_facet | Pickles, Kristen Kazda, Luise Barratt, Alexandra McGeechan, Kevin Hersch, Jolyn McCaffery, Kirsten |
author_sort | Pickles, Kristen |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Australian clinicians are advised to ‘offer evidence-based decisional support to men considering whether or not to have a PSA test’. This randomised trial compared the performance and acceptability of two new decision aids (DAs) to aid men in making informed choices about PSA screening. METHODS: ~3000 Australian men 45–60 years with varying educational attainment were recruited via an online panel and randomised to view one of two online decision aids (one full length, one abbreviated) and completed a questionnaire. The primary outcome was informed choice about PSA screening. FINDINGS: Significantly more men in the long DA group (38%) made an informed choice than men who received the shorter DA (33%) (95% CI 1.1% to 8.2%; p = 0.008). On knowledge, the long DA group scored, on average, 0.45 points higher than the short DA group (95% CI 0.14 to 0.76; p = 0.004) and 5% more of the participants achieved an adequate knowledge score (95% CI 1.9% to 8.8%; p = 0.002). Men allocated the long DA were less likely to intend to have a PSA test in the future (53%) than men in the short DA group (59%). Both DAs rated highly on acceptability. CONCLUSIONS: Both DAs were useful and acceptable to men regardless of education level and both supported informed decision making. The long version resulted in higher knowledge, and a higher proportion of men able to make an informed choice, but the differences were small. Long DAs may be useful for men whose informational needs are not satisfied by a short DA. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6961909 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69619092020-01-26 Evaluating two decision aids for Australian men supporting informed decisions about prostate cancer screening: A randomised controlled trial Pickles, Kristen Kazda, Luise Barratt, Alexandra McGeechan, Kevin Hersch, Jolyn McCaffery, Kirsten PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Australian clinicians are advised to ‘offer evidence-based decisional support to men considering whether or not to have a PSA test’. This randomised trial compared the performance and acceptability of two new decision aids (DAs) to aid men in making informed choices about PSA screening. METHODS: ~3000 Australian men 45–60 years with varying educational attainment were recruited via an online panel and randomised to view one of two online decision aids (one full length, one abbreviated) and completed a questionnaire. The primary outcome was informed choice about PSA screening. FINDINGS: Significantly more men in the long DA group (38%) made an informed choice than men who received the shorter DA (33%) (95% CI 1.1% to 8.2%; p = 0.008). On knowledge, the long DA group scored, on average, 0.45 points higher than the short DA group (95% CI 0.14 to 0.76; p = 0.004) and 5% more of the participants achieved an adequate knowledge score (95% CI 1.9% to 8.8%; p = 0.002). Men allocated the long DA were less likely to intend to have a PSA test in the future (53%) than men in the short DA group (59%). Both DAs rated highly on acceptability. CONCLUSIONS: Both DAs were useful and acceptable to men regardless of education level and both supported informed decision making. The long version resulted in higher knowledge, and a higher proportion of men able to make an informed choice, but the differences were small. Long DAs may be useful for men whose informational needs are not satisfied by a short DA. Public Library of Science 2020-01-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6961909/ /pubmed/31940376 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227304 Text en © 2020 Pickles et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Pickles, Kristen Kazda, Luise Barratt, Alexandra McGeechan, Kevin Hersch, Jolyn McCaffery, Kirsten Evaluating two decision aids for Australian men supporting informed decisions about prostate cancer screening: A randomised controlled trial |
title | Evaluating two decision aids for Australian men supporting informed decisions about prostate cancer screening: A randomised controlled trial |
title_full | Evaluating two decision aids for Australian men supporting informed decisions about prostate cancer screening: A randomised controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Evaluating two decision aids for Australian men supporting informed decisions about prostate cancer screening: A randomised controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluating two decision aids for Australian men supporting informed decisions about prostate cancer screening: A randomised controlled trial |
title_short | Evaluating two decision aids for Australian men supporting informed decisions about prostate cancer screening: A randomised controlled trial |
title_sort | evaluating two decision aids for australian men supporting informed decisions about prostate cancer screening: a randomised controlled trial |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6961909/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31940376 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227304 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pickleskristen evaluatingtwodecisionaidsforaustralianmensupportinginformeddecisionsaboutprostatecancerscreeningarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT kazdaluise evaluatingtwodecisionaidsforaustralianmensupportinginformeddecisionsaboutprostatecancerscreeningarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT barrattalexandra evaluatingtwodecisionaidsforaustralianmensupportinginformeddecisionsaboutprostatecancerscreeningarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT mcgeechankevin evaluatingtwodecisionaidsforaustralianmensupportinginformeddecisionsaboutprostatecancerscreeningarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT herschjolyn evaluatingtwodecisionaidsforaustralianmensupportinginformeddecisionsaboutprostatecancerscreeningarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT mccafferykirsten evaluatingtwodecisionaidsforaustralianmensupportinginformeddecisionsaboutprostatecancerscreeningarandomisedcontrolledtrial |