Cargando…

Assessment of Primary Health Care for rural workers exposed to pesticides

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the attributes of Primary Health Care (PHC) for rural workers; to analyze sociodemographic conditions, history of poisoning and hospitalizations for pesticides and use of personal protective equipment; and to verify exposure to pesticides by determining bioindicators. METHODS:...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Silvério, Alessandra Cristina Pupin, Martins, Isarita, Nogueira, Denismar Alves, Mello, Marco Antônio Santos, de Loyola, Edilaine Assunção Caetano, Graciano, Miriam Monteiro de Castro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Faculdade de Saúde Pública da Universidade de São Paulo 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6961967/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31967278
http://dx.doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787.2020054001455
_version_ 1783488080887414784
author Silvério, Alessandra Cristina Pupin
Martins, Isarita
Nogueira, Denismar Alves
Mello, Marco Antônio Santos
de Loyola, Edilaine Assunção Caetano
Graciano, Miriam Monteiro de Castro
author_facet Silvério, Alessandra Cristina Pupin
Martins, Isarita
Nogueira, Denismar Alves
Mello, Marco Antônio Santos
de Loyola, Edilaine Assunção Caetano
Graciano, Miriam Monteiro de Castro
author_sort Silvério, Alessandra Cristina Pupin
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the attributes of Primary Health Care (PHC) for rural workers; to analyze sociodemographic conditions, history of poisoning and hospitalizations for pesticides and use of personal protective equipment; and to verify exposure to pesticides by determining bioindicators. METHODS: Cross-sectional, descriptive-analytical study with a sample of 1,027 rural workers living in municipalities belonging to a regional health department in Southern Minas Gerais, whose PHC is governed by the Family Health Strategy model. We used the adult version of the Primary Care Assessment Tool (PCATool Brazil) and a structured questionnaire to collect socioeconomic data, history of poisoning and hospitalization for pesticides and use of personal protective equipment. Blood samples were collected to measure biomarkers of pesticide exposure and signs of renal and hepatic sequelae. RESULTS: Low education was prevalent, as well as the intense contact of workers with pesticides. Frequent use of personal protective equipment was higher among men, as was the history of poisoning and hospitalizations for pesticides. Rates of 20% poisoning, 15% liver disease and 2% nephropathy were detected. Signs of hepatotoxicity were more frequent in men. Gender differences were all statistically significant. Regarding PHC, only the attribute “degree of affiliation” had a high score. None of the poisoning cases detected in the study were previously diagnosed. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the high coverage of the Family Health Strategy, occupational risk and its consequences have not been detected by health services, which do not seem oriented to primary care, even lacking their essential attributes. There is a need for immediate and effective adaptation of public policies regarding the health of rural workers, with adequate training of teams and review of the portfolio of PHC services offered.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6961967
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Faculdade de Saúde Pública da Universidade de São Paulo
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69619672020-02-07 Assessment of Primary Health Care for rural workers exposed to pesticides Silvério, Alessandra Cristina Pupin Martins, Isarita Nogueira, Denismar Alves Mello, Marco Antônio Santos de Loyola, Edilaine Assunção Caetano Graciano, Miriam Monteiro de Castro Rev Saude Publica Original Article OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the attributes of Primary Health Care (PHC) for rural workers; to analyze sociodemographic conditions, history of poisoning and hospitalizations for pesticides and use of personal protective equipment; and to verify exposure to pesticides by determining bioindicators. METHODS: Cross-sectional, descriptive-analytical study with a sample of 1,027 rural workers living in municipalities belonging to a regional health department in Southern Minas Gerais, whose PHC is governed by the Family Health Strategy model. We used the adult version of the Primary Care Assessment Tool (PCATool Brazil) and a structured questionnaire to collect socioeconomic data, history of poisoning and hospitalization for pesticides and use of personal protective equipment. Blood samples were collected to measure biomarkers of pesticide exposure and signs of renal and hepatic sequelae. RESULTS: Low education was prevalent, as well as the intense contact of workers with pesticides. Frequent use of personal protective equipment was higher among men, as was the history of poisoning and hospitalizations for pesticides. Rates of 20% poisoning, 15% liver disease and 2% nephropathy were detected. Signs of hepatotoxicity were more frequent in men. Gender differences were all statistically significant. Regarding PHC, only the attribute “degree of affiliation” had a high score. None of the poisoning cases detected in the study were previously diagnosed. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the high coverage of the Family Health Strategy, occupational risk and its consequences have not been detected by health services, which do not seem oriented to primary care, even lacking their essential attributes. There is a need for immediate and effective adaptation of public policies regarding the health of rural workers, with adequate training of teams and review of the portfolio of PHC services offered. Faculdade de Saúde Pública da Universidade de São Paulo 2020-01-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6961967/ /pubmed/31967278 http://dx.doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787.2020054001455 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Silvério, Alessandra Cristina Pupin
Martins, Isarita
Nogueira, Denismar Alves
Mello, Marco Antônio Santos
de Loyola, Edilaine Assunção Caetano
Graciano, Miriam Monteiro de Castro
Assessment of Primary Health Care for rural workers exposed to pesticides
title Assessment of Primary Health Care for rural workers exposed to pesticides
title_full Assessment of Primary Health Care for rural workers exposed to pesticides
title_fullStr Assessment of Primary Health Care for rural workers exposed to pesticides
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of Primary Health Care for rural workers exposed to pesticides
title_short Assessment of Primary Health Care for rural workers exposed to pesticides
title_sort assessment of primary health care for rural workers exposed to pesticides
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6961967/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31967278
http://dx.doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787.2020054001455
work_keys_str_mv AT silverioalessandracristinapupin assessmentofprimaryhealthcareforruralworkersexposedtopesticides
AT martinsisarita assessmentofprimaryhealthcareforruralworkersexposedtopesticides
AT nogueiradenismaralves assessmentofprimaryhealthcareforruralworkersexposedtopesticides
AT mellomarcoantoniosantos assessmentofprimaryhealthcareforruralworkersexposedtopesticides
AT deloyolaedilaineassuncaocaetano assessmentofprimaryhealthcareforruralworkersexposedtopesticides
AT gracianomiriammonteirodecastro assessmentofprimaryhealthcareforruralworkersexposedtopesticides