Cargando…
Punishment as Moral Fortification and Non-Consensual Neurointerventions
The purpose of this paper is twofold. First, I defend and expand the Fortificationist Theory of Punishment (FTP). Second, I argue that this theory implies that non-consensual neurointerventions – interventions that act directly on one’s brain – are permissible. According to the FTP, punishment is ju...
Autor principal: | Theofilopoulou, Areti |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6962052/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31942085 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10982-018-09341-3 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Choosy Moral Punishers
por: Clavien, Christine, et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
Accuracy of consensual stereotypes in moral foundations: A gender analysis
por: Niazi, Farhan, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Consensual punishment does not promote cooperation in the six-person prisoner's dilemma game with noisy public monitoring
por: van Miltenburg, Nynke, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Unanimo Consensu
por: Mynter, Herman
Publicado: (1879) -
No Evidence for Moral Reward and Punishment in an Anonymous Context
por: Clavien, Christine, et al.
Publicado: (2016)