Cargando…

Quantification of Retinal Nerve Fibre Layer Thickness on Optical Coherence Tomography with a Deep Learning Segmentation-Free Approach

This study describes a segmentation-free deep learning (DL) algorithm for measuring retinal nerve fibre layer (RNFL) thickness on spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SDOCT). The study included 25,285 B-scans from 1,338 eyes of 706 subjects. Training was done to predict RNFL thickness from...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mariottoni, Eduardo B., Jammal, Alessandro A., Urata, Carla N., Berchuck, Samuel I., Thompson, Atalie C., Estrela, Tais, Medeiros, Felipe A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6962147/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31941958
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-57196-y
Descripción
Sumario:This study describes a segmentation-free deep learning (DL) algorithm for measuring retinal nerve fibre layer (RNFL) thickness on spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SDOCT). The study included 25,285 B-scans from 1,338 eyes of 706 subjects. Training was done to predict RNFL thickness from raw unsegmented scans using conventional RNFL thickness measurements from good quality images as targets, forcing the DL algorithm to learn its own representation of RNFL. The algorithm was tested in three different sets: (1) images without segmentation errors or artefacts, (2) low-quality images with segmentation errors, and (3) images with other artefacts. In test set 1, segmentation-free RNFL predictions were highly correlated with conventional RNFL thickness (r = 0.983, P < 0.001). In test set 2, segmentation-free predictions had higher correlation with the best available estimate (tests with good quality taken in the same date) compared to those from the conventional algorithm (r = 0.972 vs. r = 0.829, respectively; P < 0.001). Segmentation-free predictions were also better in test set 3 (r = 0.940 vs. r = 0.640, P < 0.001). In conclusion, a novel segmentation-free algorithm to extract RNFL thickness performed similarly to the conventional method in good quality images and better in images with errors or other artefacts.